Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
I do not understand the driving force behind this stupidity.

In all my years of following politics, this one episode (Sarah's resignation) has PROVEN to me beyond a shadow of doubt that all the 'establishment' insiders are together as one. Makes no difference one iota what party they belong to.

This guy wants her shut down now.

...and he's not alone. The Washington establishment NEEDS her shutdown now. Notice how many references to her lack of intelligence and her need to 'read' more that we've heard?

I truly believe that those are code words being given to her that if she tries to pull this stunt (coming after the 'good ol' boys network) there is going to be hell to pay for her personally. She successfully pulled that off in Alaska and they know that if she's not 'taken out' one way or another she'll nail them too.

She'd better be watching her back 24/7 once out of office. I'd apprciate your take on my comments.

-houeto.

162 posted on 07/09/2009 12:15:47 PM PDT by houeto (Defang the FEDGOV. Repeal the 17th! (actually, it might be too late... SECEDE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: houeto

I believe the establishment insiders are against Palin. I will say that when I took her to task for what she did last Friday, I thought it would cost her a lot of support. I’ll be honest though, it was my contention that it would cost her Independent and Democrat support down the road in the future.

It wasn’t my contention that she would lose support from well placed Republican and supposedly Conservative office holders and operatives.

I agree with your comments regarding the Washington establishment. It’s evident to me that the beltway ‘moderatism’ goes far beyond anything we imagined. Now they’re willing to adopt the Democrat’s talking points even when it comes to some of our bright developing stars.

That’s nothing but suicidal, unless her destruction wouldn’t hurt your cause. So what is their cause, if not consummate leftist policy? Game over! The gig is up.

Yesterday I posted what I thought was an interesting point comparing Presidential elections in the U.S. to the elections in the U.S.S.R. Yes, the Soviet citizens did get to vote. They just voted for one of two people within the same party.

Well, guess what. What are we doing if not the same exact thing?

Can anyone tell me that the election in 2008 was anything other than voting for one of two people running from the same party?

Our Presidential elections are meaningless. We are no better off than the people in the U.S.S.R. were.

The Republican party has so defiled it’s early primaries, that you couldn’t get a Conservative elected. And so it goes.

Our media has become Pravda. Our Presidential elections have adopted the U.S.S.R. model. One could argue that ACORN is akin to the activist body of the Politburo too.

Gooed Morninske Amerikans...


196 posted on 07/09/2009 12:30:36 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (_Resident of the United States and Kenya's favorite son, Baraaaack Hussein Obamaaaa...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson