Posted on 07/07/2009 10:04:17 PM PDT by Maelstorm
Last week when I discussed the case of Frank Lombard, Associate director of Duke University’s Center for Health Policy, who molested his adopted 5-year-old son and offered his son to other homosexuals for molestation, I also touched on the higher molestation rates of children by homosexuals.
Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education, cites this research, as does a study by Dr. Gene Abel, director of the Behavioral Medicine Institute in Atlanta, which found that homosexuals sexually molest young boys with an incidence five times greater than the molestation rate of girls. Dr. Able’s study also found that 150 boys are molested by one male homosexual offender, compared to 19.8 girls by heterosexual offenders.
I also mentioned that homosexual men have been molested as children at much higher rates than heterosexual men (35% versus 4% in one study). One of many important aspects of this finding is that, while childhood abuse does not automatically mean the child will grow up to perpetuate the abuse, it has been long known that most molesters were in fact molested themselves as children. Obviously it is a terrible cycle that should be broken where ever possible.
The folks from NAM and AidsMap in London published an article last week which examined the connection between childhood sexual abuse and adulthood risky sex and AIDS transmission:
The study lasted for four years and included a total of 4244 men. These men were recruited to the study in six US cities. All had recently had anal sex with another man, and all the men were HIV-negative at baseline. The men were randomised to receive a behavioural HIV prevention intervention or standard HIV prevention counselling. Every six months they were tested for HIV and provided details about their recent sexual behaviour.
To ascertain if an individual had a history of childhood sexual abuse they were asked on entry to the study to say if they had had a sexual experience before the age of 13 with an individual five years or more older than themselves; and/or if they had a sexual experience between the ages of 13 and 17 with an individual who was ten or more years older.
Of the 4244 individuals in the study, 1686 (40%) reported childhood sexual abuse. There were 258 HIV infections during the course of the study, a rate of 2.1 per 100 person years.
Notice that all of the individuals in this study were practicing homosexual men. Of the 4,244 homosexual men in this study 40% of them reported childhood sexual abuse. And as this relates to AIDS transmission, we are reminded of the startling statistics from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) regarding AIDS transmission: 72% of AIDS cases are associated with male homosexual conduct.
While the incidence of risky behavior and AIDS transmission is interesting and seems indicative of the mental health issues associated with victims of molestation, it is ultimately the percentage of homosexual men who report childhood sexual abuse.
The causes of homosexual behavior are complicated and the subject of considerable debate. This debate is made all the more convoluted by the propaganda thrown about by homosexual activists and their apologists who would have us believe that an immoral and unnatural sexual behavior is completely normal and legitimate.
But before the world of clinical science became so confused with politically correct misinformation, indications were that homosexual behavior often resulted from childhood molestation, relational issues with a mother or father or both, and similar circumstances. We have historically seen that for homosexual men, childhood sexual trauma is a very common factor , and for homosexual women, childhood sexual trauma is almost universal, though sometimes later sexual trauma can be a factor.
Essentially, the evidence is strong that homosexuality is not a “sexual orientation” as homosexual activists want us to believe, but rather a “sexual disorientation.”
What does it mean to be disoriented? The dictionary defines it as “to cause to lose bearings : displace from normal position or relationship b: to cause to lose the sense of time, place, or identity.”
When we are driving or flying or walking in the woods and we become disoriented, we enter a state in which we are unsure about where we are, where we should be going, and how to get there.
Since we need only look at our body’s sex organs to tell quite obviously that we were created to function heterosexually (not to mention that only 2.9% of the population is homosexual), it becomes quite clear that any orientation other than heterosexual is a disorientation.
It seems more than fair to say that, due to childhood sexual trauma, relational problems with one or more parent, or some other issue, the person has become disoriented about their sexuality.
As anyone who has become disoriented knows, one can become re-oriented with some effort and frequently some help from others.
There are those who, for whatever reason, come to enjoy disorientation. When someone drinks to excess or takes strong drugs, these have a disorienting effect, often leaving a person unsteady on their feet, not in firm command of their surroundings and how they should be acting. Often people come to like this state of disorientation, seeking to maintain that state by frequent indulgence in intoxicating substances. They, too, often need help in realizing the dangers of remaining in this disoriented state.
The similarities between a physically disoriented person and a sexually disoriented person (i.e. one not correctly oriented to their obviously heterosexual purpose) are quite striking when you think about it.
When homosexuals sometimes say they were created that way, that their “sexual orientation” is homosexual, they are incorrect. One who insists their proper orientation is homosexual is akin to the drunk who says with slurred speech, “I’m not drrunk.” Their orientation is obviously heterosexual (their bodies tell us that), but they have become disoriented as to their true nature and purpose.
And like any disoriented person, they can change. If they really want to.
So don’t be fooled by this deception. Help them by insisting on the truth and pointing those who are disoriented toward that truth. It is to their ultimate benefit, and to those around them.
It's different.
BTW, anytime you have a 40% report on a topic like this that's some pretty serious stuff.
None of it is heterosexual.
This report involves only people who have been convicted of assault against children. Maybe the data is different for comparably situatws people who have not yet been caught and convicted. BTW, it also involved a male population ~ no females in this at all.
It's a matter of the odds. Since gay men molest at 15 times to rate of straight men, you are reducing the odds greatly by eliminating them from your child's exposure. Do you mean married men who are closeted gays? Or married men who molest girls?
Those aren’t the statistics cited in the article. The study started with a pool of gay men and determined how many were molested as children. You are quoting the pool of molested children and looking at the source of the molestation. As other posters have pointed out, the resultant sexual behaviour of molested children can run to both extremes....
hh
(I know other women who were molested who instead became very promiscuous heterosexuals.)
Most of the Porn industry’s stars were molested as children.
Listening to Howard Stern, one of the 1st questions he asks porn stars is “were you molested??”.
Nearly all answer yes...
Bump
As I understand it a lot of rape victims (female) either become lesbians or very promiscuous, even becoming prostitutes.
Funny. I was thinking the same thing but wouldn’t composed such a funny response.
For a man to desire another man in that way is so odd, it would take a traumatic realignment. There’s no other way a guy could be attracted to a guy.
How do you explain the certain percentage of gay men who come from a large family, are like a middle a child and as far as all the other family members can remember from 2 years old till 18 were just “Naturally Nelly”????
I am not saying there is a number of GLBT folks who are sexually Di-Orientated. But there is a number of gay folk who are just naturally Nelly.
I grew up with some kids that could be described “Naturally Nelly” who came from big families in which everyone else was Straight as an Arrow, but they were “Fabulous” from K-12 or as long as I knew them. When those people came out it is like “Well, gee, everyone already knows you are as queer as a three dollar bill so who cares...”.
The definition of childhood sexual abuse used here is peculiar enough to warrant suspicion. Note that it includes consensual sexual contact between a 17 year old and a 27 year old, regardless of the genders of the participants. I don’t think that’s particularly rare in society as a whole — it’s not even illegal in most states, and I don’t know of any state that would prosecute it without an aggravating circumstance (e.g. the 27 year old was the 17 year old’s teacher, or the 17 year old was mentally retarded).
Without a control group showing what percent of heterosexual males fall under this definition of childhood sexual abuse, pointing out that 40% of homosexual men fall under it doesn’t provide any information. It may well be higher for homosexual men, but until you have a control group AND break down the “abuse” by ages, and by whether or not it was voluntary, and by the genders of the parties, it’s absolutely totally meaningless to support a claim or speculation that there’s a causative effect. If a large percentage of these boys/young men already self-identified as homosexual before the first “abuse” occurred, what this may be showing is that teenage homosexual boys are very horny and don’t have trouble finding homosexual men in their late 20s to have some fun with (and may be lying about their ages, using fake IDs to get into gay bars and meet older men, etc).
I would explain a “naturally Nelly” the same way I would explain a problem/criminal child or mentally ill kid coming from a normal or “good” family. Some kids are just born with a predisposition towards mental illness or emotional problems and it can manifest itself in any number of ways from criminal actions, homosexuality, emotional issues, acting out, etc.
>> I would explain a “naturally Nelly” the same way I would explain a problem/criminal child or mentally ill kid coming from a normal or “good” family. Some kids are just born with a predisposition towards mental illness or emotional problems and it can manifest itself in any number of ways from criminal actions, homosexuality, emotional issues, acting out, etc. <<
Then how should we deal with the “Naturally Nelly” type folks then?
Does sexual trauma cause women to grow up to look like men? It's hard to believe anyone would molest a bull dyke, they are too scary, although I suppose anything’s possible.
I also was mystified by their compulsion (some of them) to dress up like women.
I had led a very sheltered life and this was all such a shock to me. I couldn’t understand why if they were supposedly not attracted to women, why they did that, acted like women.
” At least with single gays you know to watch for them. Married men who molest are the worst!!!!!”
Do single men molest more often than married men? It seems that the opposite would be true. And why are married men that molest worse than single men who molest? I would think both would be equally bad.
I'd take up that problem with the state. Besides, that might have simply been the LAST occasion in a long string of events extended back into the younger party's infancy.
Yes you are right and perhaps I did not make my point very well. What I meant is that at least there is control in hiring single men. You just don’t have too which will cut down on single men molesting...However hiring married men is overall a safer investment, but if they end up molesting than I think they are the worst because the use marriage to make themself seem “safe”....Of course both single and married men who molest are awful.
Homosexuality is a mental illness folks, it has varying degrees and manifestations, but its a mental illness. The overwhelming majority of gay men I have met in my life have at least one of the 3 things in their background.
Sexually Abused or Molested, particularly at a young age.
Rediculously Overbearing mothers.
No or very poor relationships with their fathers.
Now, I am not saying that everyone who has had one or more of these things happen to them will end up gay, but there is no doubt that these events are insanely common in the background of gay men. Its an illness folks, not a lifestyle or a genetic defect. Homosexuality is a mental illness.. no one would remotely suggest a nymphomaniac was born a nymphomaniac, its a well known and accepted mental illness, yet homosexuality which has never had one study done disprove its a mental illness and in fact most show it is, is not in the DSM any longer for political reasons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.