To: Friendofgeorge
Sarah Palin is the “winnowing fork”, separating the wheat from the chaff. People can’t help but have to choose a side. We know whose side she’s on, and we know whose side those who oppose her are on.
As for the Reagan comparisons - she’s not “the next Reagan” anymore than she’s the “next Margaret Thatcher”.
She’s the first “Sarah Palin”.
23 posted on
07/06/2009 7:30:21 AM PDT by
MrB
(Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
To: MrB
Sarah Palin is the “winnowing fork”, separating the wheat from the chaff. People can’t help but have to choose a side. We know whose side she’s on, and we know whose side those who oppose her are on.
As for the Reagan comparisons - she’s not “the next Reagan” anymore than she’s the “next Margaret Thatcher”.
She’s the first “Sarah Palin”.
Let me be the first to second that notion. :)
51 posted on
07/06/2009 7:39:59 AM PDT by
IMissPresidentReagan
(Palin stepped down from her state to step up for her country. Thanks to sheikdetailfeather)
To: MrB
54 posted on
07/06/2009 7:41:15 AM PDT by
A message
(3 years 6 months 1 week 6 days)
To: MrB
You said it better than I did in post number 7.
63 posted on
07/06/2009 7:43:14 AM PDT by
MortMan
(Power without responsibility-the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages. - Rudyard Kipling)
To: MrB
She’s the first “Sarah Palin”. Absolutely. This is but the tactics of the left to get us squabbling amongst our selves while they proceed with their agenda.
Reagan was no doubt the man for the times, whether Sarah turns out to be the woman for the times remains to be seen but Reagan was Reagan, we need to let Sarah be Sarah.
106 posted on
07/06/2009 7:53:05 AM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
(zer0 is doing to capitalism what Kennedy did to health care)
To: MrB
Yes yes and YES, MrB. She is the first “Sarah Palin.” Exactly what I was going to write.
122 posted on
07/06/2009 7:58:26 AM PDT by
Miss Behave
(OMG, my tagline is stalking me.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson