Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Now that their spurious, politically-motivated lawsuit against Bush officials has been kicked out of court, the Plames claim to be Everyman, looking out for poor you and me.
1 posted on 07/03/2009 12:46:08 PM PDT by NMRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NMRed

Can’t these two just go crawl under a rock somewhere?


2 posted on 07/03/2009 12:47:55 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

The two leftist pixies need to go back to drinking latte at the local Starbucks in Santa Fe. Their “15 minutes” IS OVER!


3 posted on 07/03/2009 12:49:01 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hey America! How's that "hope and change" thing working out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

Remember when Sante Fe didn’t blow?


4 posted on 07/03/2009 12:50:44 PM PDT by noblejones (<deprecate>Ben Stein 2008.</deprecate> Sarah 2012, 2016, 2020.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

As someone who regularly represents the right-wing victims of federal oppression, I can testify that the law more and more regards federal officials as utterly unaccountable to ordinary citizens for anything. Down that path does not lie a Free Republic.


6 posted on 07/03/2009 12:51:44 PM PDT by Buchal ("Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed
"(T)he Supreme Court denied the review of a lawsuit brought by Valerie Plame Wilson and Joseph Wilson, ending the quest for redress of their constitutional rights."


7 posted on 07/03/2009 12:52:39 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see a REAL C.O.L.B. BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed
"Valerie lame" ... LOL!

Awwwwwww...poor us!

8 posted on 07/03/2009 12:52:48 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("Shouldn't there be equal time for our Bill of Responsibilities?" -- Justice Clarence Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

Check how they write about themselves in the third person. Wonder who wrote it? George Soros?


10 posted on 07/03/2009 12:54:46 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("Shouldn't there be equal time for our Bill of Responsibilities?" -- Justice Clarence Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

What was hysterical was that their initial claim was that just knowing her name was a leak, and Who’s Who had her name prior to the supposed ‘outing’.
Good to hear that they got laughed at.


12 posted on 07/03/2009 12:56:10 PM PDT by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

Huh?

&&&&&&&&&

By Valerie Plame Wilson
and Joe Wilson

Last week, in an unsurprising but still disappointing decision, the Supreme Court denied the review of a lawsuit brought by Valerie Plame Wilson and Joseph Wilson, ending the quest for redress of their constitutional rights.

&&&&&&&

The Santa Fe New Mexican allows its Op-Ed contributors to discuss themselves and their legal problems in the third person?

How completely bizarre.


13 posted on 07/03/2009 12:56:57 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

Scooter Libby is the one who should be crying , not these two butt wipes.

I wish Scooter could sue Colon Powell, for not telling the truth.


16 posted on 07/03/2009 12:58:20 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed
"....a citizen who has been injured by federal officials."

What??? She was "injured" by her own imagination!

What a joke she is....just another "nothing" who always thought she was a "something".

22 posted on 07/03/2009 1:06:21 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

For 5 years these people have known that Richard Armitage was the “leaker”, yet they are STILL lying about it. Never underestimate the shamelessness of the left.


25 posted on 07/03/2009 1:19:27 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

“federal officials can use their publicly funded positions to attack political adversaries without consequence.”

No kidding? When have they ever done otherwise? People in the Clinton Administration didn’t attack their critics? Boo hoo.


28 posted on 07/03/2009 1:24:31 PM PDT by popdonnelly (The Democrats have returned to their game of supporting totalitarian regimes. Now they're muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

They’re two schemers whose schemes haven’t worked out too well.


30 posted on 07/03/2009 1:26:35 PM PDT by popdonnelly (The Democrats have returned to their game of supporting totalitarian regimes. Now they're muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

This must be and editorial.


32 posted on 07/03/2009 1:36:18 PM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed

Is this really a newspaper? It frankly sound more like a “MoveOn” type blog.


34 posted on 07/03/2009 1:46:31 PM PDT by blau993 (Fight Gerbil Swarming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NMRed
Dang.

I had nearly forgotten the two of them existed, and they go and ruin that by writing an article about themselves.

Why doesn't she just work a street corner like the rest of them?

37 posted on 07/03/2009 7:26:13 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (He must fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson