Skip to comments.
Court winks at basic-rights assault; who's next? (Plames lash out after being laughed out of court)
Santa Fe New Mexican ^
| 07/02/2009
| Valerie lame and Joe Wilson
Posted on 07/03/2009 12:46:08 PM PDT by NMRed
(T)he Supreme Court denied the review of a lawsuit brought by Valerie Plame Wilson and Joseph Wilson, ending the quest for redress of their constitutional rights. The Court's decision reflects the trend toward closing the door on any recourse for a citizen who has been injured by federal officials. The Court's message is clear: federal officials can use their publicly funded positions to attack political adversaries without consequence.
(Excerpt) Read more at santafenewmexican.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: plamegate; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Now that their spurious, politically-motivated lawsuit against Bush officials has been kicked out of court, the Plames claim to be Everyman, looking out for poor you and me.
1
posted on
07/03/2009 12:46:08 PM PDT
by
NMRed
To: NMRed
Can’t these two just go crawl under a rock somewhere?
2
posted on
07/03/2009 12:47:55 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
To: NMRed
The two leftist pixies need to go back to drinking latte at the local Starbucks in Santa Fe. Their “15 minutes” IS OVER!
3
posted on
07/03/2009 12:49:01 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Hey America! How's that "hope and change" thing working out?)
To: NMRed
Remember when Sante Fe didn’t blow?
4
posted on
07/03/2009 12:50:44 PM PDT
by
noblejones
(<deprecate>Ben Stein 2008.</deprecate> Sarah 2012, 2016, 2020.)
To: Paladin2
5
posted on
07/03/2009 12:51:01 PM PDT
by
armymarinemom
(My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
To: NMRed
As someone who regularly represents the right-wing victims of federal oppression, I can testify that the law more and more regards federal officials as utterly unaccountable to ordinary citizens for anything. Down that path does not lie a Free Republic.
6
posted on
07/03/2009 12:51:44 PM PDT
by
Buchal
("Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .")
To: NMRed
"(T)he Supreme Court denied the review of a lawsuit brought by Valerie Plame Wilson and Joseph Wilson, ending the quest for redress of their constitutional rights."
7
posted on
07/03/2009 12:52:39 PM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see a REAL C.O.L.B. BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: NMRed
"Valerie lame" ... LOL!
Awwwwwww...poor us!
8
posted on
07/03/2009 12:52:48 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
("Shouldn't there be equal time for our Bill of Responsibilities?" -- Justice Clarence Thomas)
To: noblejones
I would only amend your post to: Remember when the People’s Republic of Santa Fe didn’t blow?
9
posted on
07/03/2009 12:53:18 PM PDT
by
NMRed
To: NMRed
Check how they write about themselves in the third person. Wonder who wrote it? George Soros?
10
posted on
07/03/2009 12:54:46 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
("Shouldn't there be equal time for our Bill of Responsibilities?" -- Justice Clarence Thomas)
To: armymarinemom
11
posted on
07/03/2009 12:55:23 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
("Shouldn't there be equal time for our Bill of Responsibilities?" -- Justice Clarence Thomas)
To: NMRed
What was hysterical was that their initial claim was that just knowing her name was a leak, and Who’s Who had her name prior to the supposed ‘outing’.
Good to hear that they got laughed at.
12
posted on
07/03/2009 12:56:10 PM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
To: NMRed
Huh?
&&&&&&&&&
By Valerie Plame Wilson
and Joe Wilson
Last week, in an unsurprising but still disappointing decision, the Supreme Court denied the review of a lawsuit brought by Valerie Plame Wilson and Joseph Wilson, ending the quest for redress of their constitutional rights.
&&&&&&&
The Santa Fe New Mexican allows its Op-Ed contributors to discuss themselves and their legal problems in the third person?
How completely bizarre.
13
posted on
07/03/2009 12:56:57 PM PDT
by
angkor
To: Buchal
As someone who regularly represents the right-wing victims of federal oppression, I can testify that the law more and more regards federal officials as utterly unaccountable to ordinary citizens for anything. Down that path does not lie a Free Republic.You are right, of course. Allow us, if you will, our fifteens minute of middle-school gloating about these two particular losers in court....
14
posted on
07/03/2009 12:57:15 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
("Shouldn't there be equal time for our Bill of Responsibilities?" -- Justice Clarence Thomas)
To: Albion Wilde
“the law more and more regards federal officials as utterly unaccountable to ordinary citizens for anything.”
Truly troubling. However, their Op-Ed is so convoluted on the legal issues that it would appear that THEIR claim was highly questionable. Thus, the Supremes wouldn’t hear it.
15
posted on
07/03/2009 12:57:27 PM PDT
by
NMRed
To: NMRed
Scooter Libby is the one who should be crying , not these two butt wipes.
I wish Scooter could sue Colon Powell, for not telling the truth.
16
posted on
07/03/2009 12:58:20 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: Buchal
fifteens minute = fifteen minutes
17
posted on
07/03/2009 12:59:08 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
("Shouldn't there be equal time for our Bill of Responsibilities?" -- Justice Clarence Thomas)
To: Albion Wilde; NMRed
>>>> Check how they write about themselves in the third person. Wonder who wrote it? <<<<
You know, it’s very possible that these two yoyos think of themselves and their fictitious little melodrama in the third person.
Which is weird, but they have proven themselves to be a couple of fruitcakes.
18
posted on
07/03/2009 1:00:35 PM PDT
by
angkor
To: angkor
19
posted on
07/03/2009 1:00:41 PM PDT
by
NMRed
To: NMRed
their Op-Ed is so convoluted on the legal issues that it would appear that THEIR claim was highly questionable. Exactly. We would have to see the case to know what really happened, and what precedents may or may not have been set/denied.
someone once analyzed lying and found that lying takes many more words than telling the truth. So no wonder this article was unreadable.
20
posted on
07/03/2009 1:01:34 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
("Shouldn't there be equal time for our Bill of Responsibilities?" -- Justice Clarence Thomas)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson