Skip to comments.
Holder: Whites and Ministers will not be protected by proposed hate crimes legislation.
Muffled Oar ^
| June 30, 2009
| Isaac Muzzey
Posted on 07/02/2009 7:43:35 AM PDT by mudblood
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
--> This guy has a lot of "insight" into DOJ affairs.
1
posted on
07/02/2009 7:43:35 AM PDT
by
mudblood
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: mudblood
Holder’s race laws, make him the second coming of the Nazi regime.
3
posted on
07/02/2009 7:45:14 AM PDT
by
junta
(I am the son of Yacub, who for one welcomes my new overlord Obama.)
To: mudblood
Hey Holder, who is going to protect you?
4
posted on
07/02/2009 7:45:43 AM PDT
by
raptor29
To: raptor29
0bama's civilian Security Apparatus.
5
posted on
07/02/2009 7:47:11 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: mudblood
One of the most fundamental principles in the founding of this nation was that all are created equal. A bloody Civil War was fought to sustain it.And another may come to restore it.
6
posted on
07/02/2009 7:48:24 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: junta
Holder is Wilhelm Stuckart reborn.
To: mudblood
Then Holder goes on to list the only groups intended to be protected by the proposed law. This is racial identity politics taking a sinister turn. Holder explicitly says the proposed law only protects classes where there is a history of violence against those groups. What we are looking for here in terms of expansion of the statute are instances where there is a historic basis. See, groups of people who are singled out for violence perpetrated against them because of who they are. I dont know if we have the same historical record to say members of our military have been targeted in the same way that people who are African American, people who are Jewish, people who are gay, have been targeted over the many years. (minute 73:00-74:00)
This is clearly and egregiously unconstitutional, but given the current political climate - including SCOTUS - it will probably pass. All you white people jes better watch youself!
8
posted on
07/02/2009 7:49:11 AM PDT
by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: mudblood
Henry Bowman, please pick up the white courtesy phone.
9
posted on
07/02/2009 7:49:45 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(I don't believe anything anyone says about anything anymore.)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: mudblood
So a white couple mugged, raped and murdered by racist black gangs or LaRaza Hispanics are just a statistic of an unfortunate incident?
Got it.
11
posted on
07/02/2009 7:50:28 AM PDT
by
poobear
To: mudblood
This is seriously insane. If any of the senators had any ba&&s they would have thrown him out of the room.
Reverse racism working overtime.
12
posted on
07/02/2009 7:50:28 AM PDT
by
VicVega
(Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
To: raptor29
Holder is a so-called African American - he is protected and angry.
13
posted on
07/02/2009 7:52:24 AM PDT
by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: mudblood
XIV Amendment!! EQUAL PROTECTION. Will some GOPer please bring this up in public along with a promise to bring the question to SCOTUS if this abomination becomes law. The GOP seems so enfeebled by the Obama method of constant pressure on all fronts.
Maybe the GOP should consider restructuring the party along the lines of a parliamentary party. Create a shadow govt. Develop a full array of policy alternatives. Nominate a candidate for POTUS this summer whose only job will be preparing for 2012 and being the daily visible opposition to Obama. The Dems are both restrucutring American govt AND running a permanent campaigm. It's time for the GOP to do something outside the box.
To: mudblood
What would it take to prove a historical pattern of violence against white folks?
15
posted on
07/02/2009 7:53:11 AM PDT
by
The Toll
To: mudblood
If it doesn’t protect whites and ministers, or anyone else, then it denies equal protection of the law. Hello?
16
posted on
07/02/2009 7:55:48 AM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(The Democrats have returned to their game of supporting totalitarian regimes. Now they're muslim.)
To: mudblood
“Whites and Ministers will not be protected by proposed hate crimes legislation”
If anything, they will be the preferred target. Like Jews in Europe. It’s been this way since the sixties and it’s getting more and more overt.
17
posted on
07/02/2009 7:56:08 AM PDT
by
Niuhuru
(Anger means your spirit isn't broken)
To: SlipKid77
"Holder is a TRAITOR."For someone to be a Traitor, they would have had to have been on our side in the first place. With Holder, that isn't the case....
18
posted on
07/02/2009 7:56:41 AM PDT
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: popdonnelly
This isn’t about making sense, this is about ‘revenge’ against whitey for their ‘crimes’ against humanity.
19
posted on
07/02/2009 7:57:02 AM PDT
by
Niuhuru
(Anger means your spirit isn't broken)
To: DuncanWaring
“Obama’s civilian Security Apparatus.”
I really look forward to the day that this element attempts to exercise any authority whatsoever in this country. The wheels all come off that day, and that collection of uneducated, undisciplined, misfits won’t know what hit them.
20
posted on
07/02/2009 7:58:10 AM PDT
by
raptor29
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson