Posted on 06/23/2009 6:02:57 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Even Bill O’Reilly (who has been pretty cold-blooded about the murder of Dr. George Tiller) seems a little taken aback when Ann Coulter says, “I don’t think of it as a murder ... I am personally opposed to shooting abortionists, but I don’t believe in imposing my morality on others.”
And: “If you don’t believe in shooting abortionists, don’t shoot an abortionist.” And: “That’s why liberals are so hysterical about this, because generally they’re on the pro-death side ... in this one case, they’re finally against someone dying, a man responsible for killing 60,000 babies.”
(Excerpt) Read more at littlegreenfootballs.com ...
An "idiot" with an IQ of 182.
I just love that Ann’s sarcasm is lost completely on the left. She goes right over their little egg heads everytime! LOL
How so? She witfully turned the liberal line on abortion back around on them.
I just had to try out my new tagline... LOL...
[had to trim it a bit to get it on there, though...]
Au contraire, mon frere. Ann makes her point brilliantly and exposes the sophistry of those who are "pro-choice".
Perhaps not, but you did and its brilliant. I'm putting you on notice thought that I'm definately stealing it.
The libs need need an instruction manual when they listen to her. :-p you just wrote the foreward. :)
Seriously. You don't get it?
So you’re OK with killing full term babies....or any unborn babies for that matter.
Are you familiar with Swift's "A Modest Proposal"?
You said — Seriously. You don’t get it?
—
Hmmmm.., must be an abortion supporter...
I guess humor is not part of your lifestyle.
Ann gets on my nerves quite often, but in reading this I found myself nod, nod, nodding along. Nothing like hoisting them on their own petards!
Think of it as a late term abortion...somewhere in the 204th trimester or so. (:^*)
"Anti-Choice" and they would be "Pro Death". I can live with that.
I don’t read it as humor, dry or wet. I think she’s being ironic.
She mentioned that in her Column June 3, 2009.
The official Web page of the ELCA instructs: "A developing life in the womb does not have an absolute right to be born." As long as we're deciding who does and doesn't have an "absolute right to be born," who's to say late-term abortionists have an "absolute right" to live?
I wouldn't kill an abortionist myself, but I wouldn't want to impose my moral values on others. No one is for shooting abortionists. But how will criminalizing men making difficult, often tragic, decisions be an effective means of achieving the goal of reducing the shootings of abortionists?
Following the moral precepts of liberals, I believe the correct position is: If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, then don't shoot one.
She is not joking.
She is dead serious.
You seeing it as a joke is “Really crossing the line here”
You know where that quote is from
Regardless of what you think of the victim, murder is still murder. That’s one reason for the law. So folks don’t go around killing people they don’t like.
Hey, douchebag. (Sorry, there’s no other word that captures your essence) I noticed there’s been quite a few responses to your clarifying statement that Coulter is an idiot. Seems everyone has taken you to the woodshed for what was your inability to extract the meaning from Ann’s remarks. Seriously, are you such a literalist that comments that bite deeper than two layers of the epidermis escape your comprehension?
Get back in this thread and defend your imbecilic statement or retract it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.