[Syncro]

Thanks for the ping, Brytani!

She mentioned that in her Column June 3, 2009.

The official Web page of the ELCA instructs: "A developing life in the womb does not have an absolute right to be born." As long as we're deciding who does and doesn't have an "absolute right to be born," who's to say late-term abortionists have an "absolute right" to live?

I wouldn't kill an abortionist myself, but I wouldn't want to impose my moral values on others. No one is for shooting abortionists. But how will criminalizing men making difficult, often tragic, decisions be an effective means of achieving the goal of reducing the shootings of abortionists?

Following the moral precepts of liberals, I believe the correct position is: If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, then don't shoot one.

[Oshkalaboomboom]

Actually the people at FR are pretty sharp when it comes to figuring out sarcasm. We have PatrickL, one clueless fool. Read the comments at LGF, they make Patrick look like a genius.

[Brytani]

Shotting of abortion doctors should be safe and rare I guess.

[Ronaldus Magnus]

I wouldn't kill an abortionist myself, but I wouldn't want to impose my moral values on others. No one is for shooting abortionists. But how will criminalizing men making difficult, often tragic, decisions be an effective means of achieving the goal of reducing the shootings of abortionists?

This is brilliant logic, and could potentially take back the language of the abortion debate back from the left.