Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP's Energy Alternative
WALL STREET JOURNAL ^ | 6/11/2009 | MIKE PENCE, JOHN SHIMKUS and FRED UPTON

Posted on 06/11/2009 5:31:27 AM PDT by kellynla

While the price of gasoline has risen 50% in the past five months, Democrats in Congress nevertheless seem determined to make our energy situation even worse. Case in point: Legislation sponsored by Reps. Henry Waxman and Edward Markey to establish a cap-and-trade system that will sharply limit carbon-dioxide emissions and increase energy prices.

Independent analyses by Charles River Associates Inc. and the National Association of Manufacturers predict the Waxman-Markey bill will cost millions of domestic jobs as manufacturers relocate plants to countries with less draconian environmental regulations. Meanwhile, the electricity rates under a cap-and-trade system would, as President Barack Obama said in January 2008 "necessarily skyrocket," by some estimates up to $4,300 each year.

This is not the way to go. Instead, House Republicans this week unveiled legislation that will lead to lower prices, more jobs, a cleaner environment, and greater energy independence. The centerpiece of our American Energy Act is a commitment to increase the production of our abundant domestic natural resources, and not to punish traditional energy producers and consumers.

The cleanest way for utilities to control CO2 emissions is to increase the supply of carbon-free nuclear energy. This is obvious and simple, but in the thousand-page Waxman-Markey bill nuclear power is hardly mentioned.

The American Energy Act establishes a national goal of licensing 100 new nuclear reactors over the next 20 years. With 31 announced reactor applications already in the pipeline, this goal can be achieved -- and it will revitalize an entire manufacturing sector, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs. The bill also streamlines a cumbersome regulatory process by offering a two-year, fast-track approval program for power-plant applications that employ safe reactor designs already approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: energy; gop; nuclear
"As for the problem of spent nuclear fuel rods, our bill emphasizes safe storage and fuel recycling."

Messrs. Pence, Shimkus and Upton are Republican congressmen from Indiana, Illinois and Michigan respectively.
1 posted on 06/11/2009 5:31:27 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Obama believes that Iran should have nuclear power.

But, not America.


2 posted on 06/11/2009 5:32:21 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Without reading it, it is a safe bet that the GOP’s energy policy is run off of K street!!!
3 posted on 06/11/2009 5:41:58 AM PDT by org.whodat ("Way past time for new commodities regulation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

CO2 is not a pollutant and there is no global warming. There is no need for Cap and Tax.

Pray for America


4 posted on 06/11/2009 5:46:04 AM PDT by bray (Time to Stand Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

CO2 is not a pollutant. Period.


5 posted on 06/11/2009 5:51:31 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

In a Year Without a Summer, these bozos are pushing cap-and-trade, in an attempt to stop the ice caps from melting. Unbelievable.


6 posted on 06/11/2009 5:54:17 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (We are a ruled people, serfs to the Federal Oligarchy -- and the Tree of Liberty thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

The Global Warming fundamentalists have made CO2 a pollutant.
That way they can control everything.

Pray for America


7 posted on 06/11/2009 6:02:05 AM PDT by bray (Time to Stand Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bray
It's the key to controlling everything and everyone. A completely bogus threat as H. L. Mencken prophesied.
8 posted on 06/11/2009 6:07:29 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE; Libloather

Quote of the day right there.


9 posted on 06/11/2009 6:30:56 AM PDT by AT7Saluki (No cejar, no ceder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

You can forget it. Once people with no clue even hear the word “nuclear”, it’s all over.


10 posted on 06/11/2009 6:49:04 AM PDT by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatplains

“You can forget it. Once people with no clue even hear the word “nuclear”, it’s all over.”

You’re behind the times, Newbie.LOL

“In the U.S.,...81% favor using more nuclear power, with only 19% flat-out opposed to nukes.”
More Nukes: Support for Nuclear Power Growing, Accenture Says
March 17, 2009
WALL STREET JOURNAL
http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2009/03/17/more-nukes-support-for-nuclear-power-growing-accenture-says/tab/print/


11 posted on 06/11/2009 6:58:58 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Remember, I said “with no clue”. If the 81% can manage to be heard over the clueless, that would be awesome. Lately in this country, the minority voices rule.


12 posted on 06/11/2009 7:03:08 AM PDT by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: greatplains
You were wrong in your first point and then you try to justify your first error with another fallacy of “the minority voices rule.”

shezzzzzzzzzz...I hope you aren't allowed to operate machinery. LOL

13 posted on 06/11/2009 7:20:40 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I cannot believe that Democrats in Congress, other than those representing loony left districts, would pass a cap and trade bill that will hit every household in their constituency with a 50% increase in electric rates plus boost prices on just about everything. Do they seriously expect voters to just accept this “sacrifice” for the sake of global warming? Do they think they can blame this on George Bush? Do they expect voters to re-elect them for these ridiculous price increases?


14 posted on 06/11/2009 8:16:22 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Drill here, drill now.

Produce our abundant natural gas supplies, encourage natural gas vehicles, and tell the cut-throaters to drink their oil.


15 posted on 06/11/2009 8:28:25 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Wow. Sorry you’re in such a snarky mood.


16 posted on 06/11/2009 9:30:49 AM PDT by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
” I cannot believe that Democrats in Congress?”

we're dealing with Leftists and they won't be happy ‘til EVERYONE is on the dole or working for the gov’t...

and with HALF the population dependent on the gov’t for their livelihood NOW, if we don't turn this mess around VERY SOON, the whole damn country will look like the ol’ U.S.S.R.!

17 posted on 06/11/2009 12:24:02 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson