The article is unreadable primarily because the criminal attacker is called the “victim.”
hell, I knew it was gonna be difficult after I got this far.....*grins*
This part is clear enough: He had been shot in the groin with a 12-gauge shotgun.
Harry Lee Derryberry, known as Chuck, was....shot in the groin with a 12-gauge shotgun.
It’s not you. The worst written stories typically come from TV stations.
"Unfortunate for the victim, the victim's family and the person that had to do the shooting," Sheriff Wilson said.
The victim is the shooter who will suffer a conscioss of killing another human with regret on the one hand but luck, for being alive.
That is not unreadable in is incoherent and scattered.
Personally, I liked this quote the best: “Upon speaking with the deputy arriving on the scene, he told me he actually heard the gunshot when the gun was fired,” Sheriff Wilson explained.
It would have been pretty freaky if he had heard the gunshot before the gun was fired.
Translation: the D.A. couldn't make heads or tails out of that saga either, and therefore suspected that a grand jury would be similarly confused.
LOL... a District Attorney named "Buzz"!
I've been to the Lookout Mountain area a few times, years ago - sounds like it's still as interesting as ever. :-)
Looking at it closely, and going by the fact the police said it was an act of self defense, the guy that was shot was attacking the shooter and his family, why I don’t know. The person writing the story is trying to make out the perp as the victim in the shooting and so the article is mostly useless due to the bias and whining about the poor 45 yo that got his a** shot off.
Sorry maybe its just me but this story sounds really f-ed up.
There’s a man lying dead on his own property. And this is very bothersome.
The shooter could have left when he went to retrieve his shotgun.