Posted on 05/26/2009 3:03:25 PM PDT by Maelstorm
Gay couple left free to abuse boys - because social workers feared being branded homophobic
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-480151/Gay-couple-left-free-abuse-boys--social-workers-feared-branded-homophobic.html
This was the first gay couple to adopt in the UK. They knew the stakes and still molested.
D’ya think?
I mean, who woulda thunk it?
[head-slap]
Shhhh, don’t tell the MSM!
This is the prevailing story underlying the demise of Western Civilization.
.
In other news, water is wet.
Yes it is. What gets me is that a few hours at the local library is all it takes to debunk the left. The sexual activist community don’t want Ozzie and Harriet Marriage that is a lie. What they want often too ugly for words.
I’m going to have to question the methodology of thise study, since for one thing pedophiles who abuse boys tend to have far more victims than those who abuse girls, so even a very small percentage of the homosexual population that does abuse boys could have a comparable number of victims to a much larger number of heterosexual men who abuse girls.
Still, I wouldn’t be surprised if the conclusion is nonetheless accurate.
You could probably make similar statistical cases for a lot of subgroups - catholic priests, childhood molestation victims, bald straight men, fat straight men, straight men into S&M, etc.
A homosexual cannot automatically be considered a child molester, said Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education in suburban Louisville, Ky... Since heterosexuals outnumber the homosexual population about 44 to 1, as a group the incidence of homosexuals molesting children is up to 40 times greater than heterosexuals, she said.
Any dogs or donkeys involved? :)
The coorelation between homosexuality and pedophilia has historically been spiked just as much as the medically proven link between abortion and the increased risk of breast cancer.
The MSM not only has blood on its hands but also the violated innocence of children.
It *absolutely* defies logic for a guy who routinely “does it” with adult females to “do” underage boys at the same time.It’s *so* illogical that I refuse to believe that it happens with *any* regularity regardless of what the American Psychological Association or “GLADD” says.
The conclusion is accurate. Moreover, a desire for “intergenerational intimacy” (their euphemism for pedophilia) is fairly mainstream among homosexual/bisexual males. For example, the 1972 “Gay Rights” platform, most of the planks of which have been or are on the cusp of being adopted, openly calls for the ELIMINATION of age-of-consent laws. Why? Because they want to have sex with children...NAMBLA isn’t an aberation.
One thing I never understood is the persistent claim, made whenever an adult male rapes an adolescent male, that molesters are more likely to be heterosexual. My question is, if the guy is raping boys, often boys on the verge of manhood, how the hell do you call him heterosexual? What kind of heterosexual is sexually attracted to a 14 year old boy?
I found this:
Pedophilia (the sexual abuse of a prepubescent child) among priests is extremely rare, affecting only 0.3% of the entire population of clergy. This figure, cited in the book Pedophiles and Priests by non-Catholic scholar, Philip Jenkins, is from the most comprehensive study to date, which found that only one out of 2,252 priests considered over a thirty-year period was afflicted with pedophilia.
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/facts/fm0011.html
Did you see this?
No goddamned queers in my Troop.
Human sexuality, especially male sexuality, is polymorphous, or utterly wild (far more so than animal sexuality).
- DENNIS PRAGER
http://catholiceducation.org/articles/sexuality/ho0003.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.