So, why did you say there wasn't one when there obviously was? Can we assume that you put so little thought into all your statements?
"So if this your model, how were NASA scientists able to land probes on Venus and Mars, and send orbital probes to Jupter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune if they were using a model that was completely incorrect?"
You didn't read the site, did you? Does the name Ernst Mach mean anything to you? Can we assume that you put so little thought into all your questions?
"Don't you think they would have noticed the sun's orbit flailing into the orbits of the gas giants? Wouldn't they have had to take this massive difference in gravitation and direction into account to have their trajectories be correct?"
You didn't take the time to read either site or study the model, did you? Do the statements of Einstein, Hoyle, Born and Ellis mean anything to you? Can we assume that you put so little thought into all your questions?
Can you not answer these extremely simple questions without sending me to read a pseudoscience site? How can you launch a probe to Jupiter without taking the sun's gravity into account? How?
Also, I'm sure you read the final report on the Gravity Probe B that said that frame dragging is plainly visible in the processed data. All those wasted posts from you that tried to use NASA work to back up your 15th century theory. Shameful.
Do you believe in the Ptolemaic or the Tycho model?