[tacticalogic]

Try to pay attention...circular logic, something you're intimately familiar with, is what's being debunked here.

They're arguments are equivalent to arguing that the label on a bottle of water that says how many ounces are in it is an exercise in circular logic because an ounce is defined as being the weight of a given volume of water.

[ClearCase_guy]

I’m reading this with my mouth hanging open. Your nonsense just blows me away. I don’t think you understand the concept of “circular logic” at all.

[valkyry1]

arguments are equivalent to arguing that the label on a bottle of water that says how many ounces are in it is an exercise in circular logic because an ounce is defined as being the weight of a given volume of water

Good try but the truth is it is far from that