To: tpanther
Try to pay attention...circular logic, something you're intimately familiar with, is what's being debunked here. They're arguments are equivalent to arguing that the label on a bottle of water that says how many ounces are in it is an exercise in circular logic because an ounce is defined as being the weight of a given volume of water.
129 posted on
05/13/2009 7:17:15 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
I’m reading this with my mouth hanging open. Your nonsense just blows me away. I don’t think you understand the concept of “circular logic” at all.
130 posted on
05/13/2009 7:21:35 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(American Revolution II -- overdue)
To: tacticalogic; tpanther
arguments are equivalent to arguing that the label on a bottle of water that says how many ounces are in it is an exercise in circular logic because an ounce is defined as being the weight of a given volume of waterGood try but the truth is it is far from that
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson