[valkyry1]

arguments are equivalent to arguing that the label on a bottle of water that says how many ounces are in it is an exercise in circular logic because an ounce is defined as being the weight of a given volume of water

Good try but the truth is it is far from that 

[tacticalogic]

Good try but the truth is it is far from that

Feel free to demonstrate. Later on, maybe we'll have someone come along using mischaracterized quote mining to argue that "science isn't about truth", and make the whole thing moot.