Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Air Farce One Report -- A Classic Case Of Misdirection
The Obama File ^ | 5/9/09 | Beckwith

Posted on 05/09/2009 4:30:54 AM PDT by Beckwith


A White House military aide who authorized an Air Force flyover of New York that caused panic among some people in the city resigned on Friday.


Louis Caldera said in a resignation letter to Obama that the controversy over the mission -- a photo shoot of a jumbo jet used as Air Force One with the Statue of Liberty in the background -- made it impossible for him to lead the White House Military Office (WHMO).

White House officials said the flight was designed to update the official photo of the plane, known as Air Force One when the president is aboard.

The flight over lower Manhattan for a photo shoot scared some New Yorkers who remembered the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001 involving hijacked airliners that destroyed the World Trade Center.  Many people panicked and evacuated office buildings when the planes flew over -- as low as 150 feet.

Caldera had approved the mission.  His resignation came on the same day Defense Secretary Robert Gates said in a letter to Senator John McCain that the photo shoot cost U.S. taxpayers as much as $357,000.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs (Gibbels) said Obama had accepted the resignation.  Obama had been described as furious when the incident occurred on April 27 and demanded a review.

Isn't that tidy -- Louis Caldera is responsible -- but responsible for what?

Louis Caldera is responsible for "approving" the flight.  No need to look any further.  Caldera is responsible -- off with his head -- move on!

However, none of this answers the key question -- WHO REQUESTED THE FLIGHT?

Start with Caldera's boss.  Who does Caldera work for -- and who does that guy work for -- and who does that guy work for.  Somewhere up that food chain is the genius whose brainstorm is responsible for this clusterflop -- that person is the "Requestor" or "Initiator" -- that's the guy that is really responsible.

When the flight was a "Go," the WHMO Deputy Director sent an email to the Director, saying the flight would receive some "local press," but the White House shouldn't catch any questions about it.  The email also suggested notifying Jim Messina and Robert Gibbels.

The flight then flew into history.

The White House (read Rhambo) investigated the flight and The White House Counsel's Office (Gregory Craig) produced a report, "Internal Review Concerning April 27, 2009 Air Force One Flight."  (It's interesting this report uses the "Air Force One" designation, as the aircraft is only referred to in this way when POTUS is on board.  Is Craig suggesting that Obama was on the flight?)

The report (I could access only the first 3 pages of the .pdf file for some reason) says that the Deputy Director of the WHMO "suggested that when the plan was finalized, the Director MAY want to inform White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Jim Messina (not the singer). The Deputy Director believed that Mr. Messina would want notice because the plan involved the use of the Presidential aircraft and because it was unusual."

I'll say!

Note, the focus of this report is on the WHMO, the initial flight planning and the subsequent processes and reviews that resulted in the flight.  Nowhere in the "official" report is there any mention of the person or persons who initiated the request for the flight mission that was ultimately "approved" by Caldera.

And, it doesn't answer the secondary question -- WHO WAS ON BOARD?  Any honest investigation would provide the flight and passenger manifests.  Neither of these are addressed in the report (whitewash).


A Reuters news article said the report of the review, mentioned above, said ultimately Caldera did not notify relevant White House officials about the flyover in advance.

"When asked why he failed to do so, he did not offer a coherent explanation.  He stated that it was not a conscious decision -- he did not intend not to notify them," it said. "Instead, he suggested that it may have been an oversight."

An oversight?  I just find that statement to be unbelievable.


Caldera had previously apologized for the April 27 incident, saying, "Last week, I approved a mission over New York.  I take responsibility for that decision (approving the flight).  While federal authorities took the proper steps to notify state and local authorities in New York and New Jersey, it's clear that the mission created confusion and disruption.  I apologize and take responsibility for any distress that flight caused."

And like a good little Obot, Caldera fell on his sword.

The White House Military Office (2,300 managers and staff) knew about the flight, and so did the Department of Defense, and Andrews Air Force Base, and the Air Mobility Command, and the Presidential Airlift Group, and the 89th Airlift Wing, and the Federal Aviation Administration and air traffic control representatives in the New York are, and "federal, state and local authorities."

It seems everyone in the government knew about the "secret flight" except Obama and his senior White House advisers.  Sgt. Schultz ("I know nothing") would be proud.

Of course Obama was furious when the incident occurred.  It hit the fan the day before his 100th day's celebration and victory speech, dramatically affecting the news.

But he knew nothing about it -- nor did any other "responsible" person in and around the White House -- just Caldera, even though the report contains several mentions of Jim Messina, whose boss is Rhambo -- and Rhambo's boss is Obama -- that's two degrees of separation.



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: af1; airfarceone; airforceone; bho44; bhoairforceone; caldera; georgelucas; obama; ratcrime; redtails; tuskegeeairmen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-209 next last
To: Caipirabob
This whole thing is seeming more like Obama’s “posse” were smoking some “blunts” and decided to buzz New York...

Something like Beyonce and J-Zee are staying at The Plaza, lets buzz them. I got the hots for Beyonce. I'll show her who the real gansta is I just got off from threatening those white boys at Chrysler

161 posted on 05/09/2009 1:00:32 PM PDT by dennisw (Your action becomes your habit. Your habit becomes your character, that becomes your destiny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith; All

I am sure that Obama really was furious.

He was furious that a plan, he most likely had prior knowledge about, managed to NOT escape the wrath of the public and NOT escape his hold on certain segments of the media. Those incidents of his staff’s lack of control of the situation is what made him “furious”.


162 posted on 05/09/2009 1:01:40 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
"It seems everyone in the government knew about the "secret flight" except Obama and his senior White House advisers. Sgt. Schultz ("I know nothing") would be proud."

Meanwhile back at the White Lie House in DC:

I/WE KNOW NOTHING!


163 posted on 05/09/2009 1:02:10 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals, foriegn/domestic terrorists, or tax cheats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
My question is: Why would they try to hide it???

Because, it's quite possible that this [conclusion, deduction, assumption] is 'a stretch' on your part ...

You're going to need more or you'll lose your arse if your 'go public' with it on [say] Drudge ...

164 posted on 05/09/2009 1:17:00 PM PDT by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
That which to focus on is the camera platform plane. The pic below is a screenshot of this video , as it flies over the Statue of Liberty. The 'Red Tail' F-16 is clearly a prop. The camera plane would need be setup for filming, especially if Red Tails has, as is likely, a 3D IMAX version. The camera plane, for example, would likely have an external camera mount. If the third plane is just a conventional F-16, then the Lucas theory is out.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

165 posted on 05/09/2009 1:33:32 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
In a way, they were right.

The flight occurred a matter of hours after a memorable Rush riff on the subject of a possible future terrorist attack, "... maybe there's not going to be another terrorist attack, maybe Obama IS the terrorist attack."

166 posted on 05/09/2009 1:34:06 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: cll

They were posted to Africa first, flying P40s and then they had P47s I believe, flying ground attack missions and finally assigned to Europe and flying P51s on bomber escort duty. This is how I remember their history and may be wrong.


167 posted on 05/09/2009 1:35:50 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

That video is a great find.

I don’t understand your conclusion: “If the third plane is just a conventional F-16, then the Lucas theory is out.”

Can’t the 3D IMAX camera be mounted on asn F-16?


168 posted on 05/09/2009 1:53:16 PM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
I don’t understand your conclusion: “If the third plane is just a conventional F-16, then the Lucas theory is out.”

Can’t the 3D IMAX camera be mounted on an F-16?

I imagine, yes, but then it wouldn't be conventional. If the camera plane was an F-16 with an external IMAX camera pod, then the Lucas theory is just about proven.

169 posted on 05/09/2009 2:03:36 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
According to this WSJ article , the camera plane was also an F-16, with a combat photographer on board. No IMAX or movie camera. Based on this, I think the Lucas theory doesn't hold. If it was film production it would have been probably a civilian Gulfstream or the like that regularly does such filming.

The only thing that needs be explained, is why the DC National Guard F-16 had a red tail? But there is no scandal in that.

The 747-200B aircraft, one of two used as Air Force One, was accompanied by two F-16 fighters from the D.C. Air National Guard, which operates out of Andrews.

"We've never been asked to do this before," said Capt. Byron Coward, a spokesman for the guard unit.

While the F-16s were flown by guard pilots, the photographs were taken by Master Sgt. Andrew N. Dunaway, a specially trained Air Force photographer based with a combat camera squadron at Charleston Air Force Base, S.C.

Only one of the F-16s was involved in the photo shoot; the other peeled off once the 747 reached New York, but both accompanied the plane back to Andrews. According to Vicki Stein, an Air Force spokeswoman, the cost for the fighters, both of which flew nearly two hours, was $28,000.

170 posted on 05/09/2009 2:23:19 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I guess now Obama won’t be able to do a voice over for “Red Tails” with the red tail F-16 flying with AF1 over the Statue of Liberty.

That's what I thought, too - this kills the final shot. But then I remembered the short attention span of the American public and the fact that this is probably not being discussed at all anywhere but here...and I realized that Bambi and Lucas have nothing to worry about. They can keep the shot. It's all cool.

171 posted on 05/09/2009 2:49:51 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

is this the comment you are referring to?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2247156/posts?q=1&;page=101

scroll down to #118

Chapter 5. Special Flight Handling
Section 1. Presidential Aircraft


172 posted on 05/09/2009 2:57:24 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
In time, it will all come out.

Dressing the F-16 as an Alabama Air Guard is puzzling.

I suppose it's possible that Lucas fitted the F-16 with an IMAX that was operated by by Master Sgt. Andrew N. Dunaway, a specially trained Air Force photographer.

That special training could have been on the operation of a wing-mounted IMAX camera?

It would be standard film-making practice to also shoot stills while the movie camera was rolling.

The only thing I know, is that we don't know the whole story.

173 posted on 05/09/2009 3:55:25 PM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

That’s it.

Those are the regs for the operation of Air Force One aircraft.

The kids can’t have the keyes to the car without daddy knowing about it.


174 posted on 05/09/2009 3:57:27 PM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; shoptalk
Unbelievable. Looks like Buckhead has some competition.

L

175 posted on 05/09/2009 4:19:24 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
The kids can’t have the keyes to the car without daddy knowing about it.

Ha! You have reminded me of a common refrain heard in Germany during WW2:

if The Fuhrer knew what was going on, he would put a stop to it immediately!

My own mother found herself interrogated by the Gestapo for replying;

It is he who gives the orders, there is nothing he does not know!'

176 posted on 05/09/2009 4:19:33 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

From the video, all I saw was AF1 and a solo F-16.


177 posted on 05/09/2009 4:20:48 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Yonder stands your orphan with his gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady
si·ne·cure (sī'nĭ-kyŏŏr', sĭn'ĭ-) n. A position or office that requires little or no work but provides a salary. See "government."
178 posted on 05/09/2009 5:02:16 PM PDT by 4Liberty (End of civilization. 'Who cares about a little pork?' - Senator Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

?


179 posted on 05/09/2009 5:14:00 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti
From the video, all I saw was AF1 and a solo F-16.

Huh? The pic (and video) clearly shows three planes: AF1, F-16 flying close ('Red Tail'), and a third aircraft, reportedly an F-16.


180 posted on 05/09/2009 5:17:56 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson