Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norman Bates; BillyBoy; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj

Specter looks doomed even with the 3 conservative opponents.


61 posted on 04/25/2009 10:44:08 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Impy
The problem I see is it looks like the poll only mentioned Specter and Toomey to Republicans, then asked Republicans which they'd prefer. Of course Specter is going to lose a two-way race to Toomey -- he only got 50% in 2004 even with Bush & Santorum full throttle on Specter's side.

But I don't see clear evidence that Specter will be defeated with the conservative "anti-Specter" vote split among many candidates, which is what Arlen Specter is probably banking on. Peg Luksik, Larry Murphy, and Pat Toomey are all currently seeking the nomination, and all three are known conservative candidates who have run statewide before (two of them against Specter -- Murphy was his '98 opponent and Toomey was '04)

Can Rassumussen point to a poll where Specter is losing by a clear margin with a "If the election was today and the candidates were Pat Toomey, Arlen Specter, Peg Luksik, and Larry Murphy, which would you vote?" scenario? Because that's the situation right now. I sure hope Specter is still trailing in such a scenario, but I have doubts. With RAT and Indy crossover and the "moderate" country-club GOP voters, Specter could probably pull 40% in a 4-way race, which is enough to win if the remaining 60% is split among 3 conservatives.

63 posted on 04/25/2009 11:06:03 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson