Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Obama campaign cash quashing eligibility suits?
wnd ^

Posted on 04/23/2009 5:43:27 AM PDT by cycle of discernment

Is Obama campaign cash quashing eligibility suits? FEC shows more than $1 million paid to top law firm since election April 22, 2009 By Chelsea Schilling © 2009 WorldNetDaily President Obama may be using campaign funds to stomp out eligibility lawsuits brought by Americans, as his campaign has paid more than $1 million to his top lawyer since the election. According to Federal Election Commission records, Obama For America paid $688,316.42 to international law firm Perkins Coie between January and March 2009. FEC's Obama For America 2009 April quarterly report, disbursements by payee The campaign also compensated Perkins Coie for legal services between Oct. 16, 2008 and Dec. 31, 2008 – to the tune of $378,375.52. Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie – top lawyer for Obama, Obama's presidential campaign, the Democratic National Committee and Obama's Organizing for America – is the same Washington, D.C., lawyer defending President Obama in lawsuits challenging his eligibility to be president. As WND reported earlier, Bauer sent a letter to plaintiff Gregory Hollister, a retired Air Force colonel, of Hollister v. Soetoro, threatening sanctions if he doesn't withdraw his appeal of the eligibility case that earlier was tossed by a district judge because the issue already had been "twittered." Bauer's warning was dated April 3 and delivered via letter to the plaintiff's attorney, John D. Hemenway. It is not the first such warning issued. Lawyers trying to kill a similar California lawsuit filed on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes also said they would seek sanctions against the plaintiff's attorneys...

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; certifigate; democrats; obama; obamatruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 04/23/2009 5:43:27 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Is this a legal use of campaign funds?


2 posted on 04/23/2009 5:47:56 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: thethirddegree
"Is this a legal use of campaign funds?"

The law is only to be used against non-'rats.

4 posted on 04/23/2009 5:53:32 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree

I can’t believe it’s legal to use campaign funds this way. But it explains why obama’s team continues to solicit donations, even though they have a huge surplus now. Of course, the question is - if there’s nothing to hide, why don’t they allow a law suit to go forward. Then they could honestly say that the birth issue has been “debunked.”


5 posted on 04/23/2009 5:53:59 AM PDT by ElayneJ (q1`dsz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

The lying goat loving Muslim is spending a lot of money to Keep his ineligibilty hidden. This makes it a lot easier to believe that he is not eligible.


6 posted on 04/23/2009 5:57:42 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year military veteran of Navy, Air Force, and Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
7 posted on 04/23/2009 6:00:02 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree
Is this a legal use of campaign funds?

Yeah. It might be an illegal use of federal funds.

8 posted on 04/23/2009 6:01:21 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Did you watch the video here in the Free Republic addressing the question of whether or not Obama is the AntiChrist? He seems to have met 12 of the 19 Biblical tests. The other 7 he could not start on until he assumed office.


9 posted on 04/23/2009 6:01:46 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Is Obama campaign cash quashing eligibility suits?

You betcha!


10 posted on 04/23/2009 6:02:14 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

These days, when someone takes a job in the U.S. they have to produce documentation for the employer showing they’re a citizen or otherwise here legally. The job of president is an elected one. The president works for us. It’s not the other way around. We should have the right to see proof of citizenship. How can the courts continue to claim that citizens have no standing under the law? Things have really gotten out of control.


11 posted on 04/23/2009 6:03:11 AM PDT by ElayneJ (q1`dsz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
Depends on how you define "appear" or "emerge", because THE anti-Christ cannot appear until the Holy Spirit leaves the the earth. And the Holy Spirit dwells in every Christian.
Since there have been no unexplained "absences"...

However, he IS anti Christ.

1 John 4:5-6

12 posted on 04/23/2009 6:05:08 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, Bowman later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

>>Is this a legal use of campaign funds?

Yeah. It might be an illegal use of federal funds. <<

This is just a non-lawyer’s reaction but I would think the campaign would be the logical way to pay to defend challenges to whether the campaign was legal.


13 posted on 04/23/2009 6:05:37 AM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ElayneJ
Although many on the site do not believe this, unspent campaign funds become the property of the successful, or unsuccessful candidate's campaign organization, which if it's properly and legally set up (and they always are) means the money is under the control of the candidate.

E.G., Democrats are still mad that John Kerry (remember him?) glommed over $17Million in unspent campaign funds, which they felt should have been used in a last minute blitz. He also kept valuable research data such as High tech electronic donor lists. The money was not shared with other Democrat candidates and the data is actually sold to other Democrats.

Politics can be a very lucrative business. The present POTUS has huge campaign funds, perhaps as much as $250 Million, under his direct personal control. If he wants to hire million-dollar lawyers to cover his trail, ain't nobody to stop him.

14 posted on 04/23/2009 6:07:58 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (The Election of 2008: Given the choice between stupid and evil, the stupid chose evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Ping!


15 posted on 04/23/2009 6:08:43 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

From what I understand of the law that’s pretty much the case.


16 posted on 04/23/2009 6:13:26 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree

In NJ, Wayne Bryant wasn’t allowed (still isn’t) to use his campaign funds for his legal fees per the state ELEC. But that is state level. Don’t know about Federal.


17 posted on 04/23/2009 6:14:21 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

That is hysterical!


18 posted on 04/23/2009 6:15:10 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

There is so much dirty money running through the Democrat/Socialist party that it is impossible for even a Diogenes to find an honest man.


19 posted on 04/23/2009 6:20:21 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli now reads "Oil the gun..eat the cannolis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

international law firm, hmmmmmmm.


20 posted on 04/23/2009 6:22:25 AM PDT by Paytriot (do we have standing yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson