Posted on 04/16/2009 10:47:58 PM PDT by pissant
Gay squadrons?
The article is lying. There is no ban on gays serving in the military. Gays just are not to brag about their sexual adventures.
A Navy O-3 buddy of mine, currently assigned to the Pentagon, is leaving the service in disgust this summer. I expect there will be a lot more following him...
Yes please!!!
How "openly"?
New motto: “Cover your buddy’s behind.”
Hours, days wasted on “sensitivity” training. That’s the future? Ten years now the way the first openly”gay” general?
I’d rather have Bill Gates as Sec Def than this clown.
> Hours, days wasted on sensitivity training.
Reminds me of the sensitivity class on Rescue Me’. The video only showed the white guy was racist and when asked what everyone learned, Leary’s character stands up and says “only white people are racist?”
gotta pingout tomorrow.
Gates must be tea bagging B Hussein.
they will bring back slavery... the draft because the rates of volunteers will drop big
The only way this is going to be operable is if they have explicit “gay squadrons.” No normal man is going to want to run the risk of getting rump ranged, or tolerate the pillow talk.
I’ve said ‘til I’m blue in the face.
Remember: liberal Digg types want precision in all things until it comes to their pet causes at which point The Big Lie is acceptable.
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Checkout: http://SilencingChristians.com
what the hell was Bush doing letting this idiot in and no way do I or anyone else who has served want to be with a bunch of homos.
they want homos in the military like they do then they are asking for trouble
“We will do what the president asks us to do,” Gates said at the Army War College. “There is a law; we will uphold the law. If the law changes, so will our policies.”
So what is it that makes him a POS? Is he advocating a change? No, he’s said the law is the law and the military policy will be to uphold the law and when that changes so will the policies. Do you want him to violate the law and polices? I doubt it.
Is he inserting his personal beliefs into the discussion?Nobody knows.
BTW: Where was he before? CIA. Maybe, just maybe, by bringing it up, he’s creating the a counter-op firestorm to ensure that it doesn’t change.
I don’t know, you don’t know and we won’t know until he tells us.
Not telling us is = a POS? A little hyperbolic.
There is one usual and a couple of newer “subtle” supporters of the “gay” agenda on this thread.
Note to PurpleMan- anyone advocating, allowing, going along with, tolerating, or in any other way helping the military change its policy to a “gay” friendly policy is, by definition, a POS.
Not hyperbole, just the crude truth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.