As long as he’s not a danger to the kids well being, his and all fathers rights need to be protected.
All you men out here, imagine if it were YOUR kid that was being denied to YOU, for no legitimate reason.
As I said before, is the guy a jerk? Probably.
Being a jerk is not grounds to deny him visitation.
The article has tricky wording. Levi doesn't say the Palins are denying him visitation with his son. He says they're not allowing him to spend time alone with his son. IOW, he wants unsupervised visitation. Given his mother's drug bust, I can understand them denying him "alone" time.
In any case, if he and Bristol had married before she became pregnant or, at the very least, before the baby was born, he could be with his son everyday right now.
True... as long as he's not the only jerk in the household. By all other reports so far his family sounds like a real bunch of "winners."
Freepers seem to think felony convictions by default kill custody and visitation.
They could not be more wrong.