Mostly I find it to be intellectually lazy
LOL
of course you do as you still cannot answer it
it was simple
every argument used for homos to marry can be used for any other kind of marraige.
do you see that
yes or no
Now that's just silly.
Equal protection demands that laws treat alike all people who are similarly situated with respect to the legitimate purposes of the law. [S]imilarly situated cannot mean simply similar in the possession of the classifying trait. All members of any class are similarly situated in this respect, and consequently, any classification whatsoever would be reasonable by this test. Likewise, similarly situated cannot be interpreted to require plaintiffs be identical in every way to people treated more favorably by the law. No two people or groups of people are the same in every way, and nearly every equal protection claim could be run aground [under] a threshold analysis that requires the two groups be a mirror image of one another. Rather, equal protection demands that the law itself must be equal. It requires that laws treat all those who are similarly situated with respect to the purposes of the law alike. Thus, the purposes of the law must be referenced for a meaningful evaluation.The purpose of Iowas marriage law is to provide an institutional basis for defining the fundamental relational rights and responsibilities of persons in committed relationships. It also serves to recognize the status of the parties committed relationship. In this case, the court concluded, plaintiffs are similarly situated compared to heterosexual persons; they are in committed relationships and official recognition of their status provides an institutional basis for defining their fundamental relational rights and responsibilities.
Iowa Supreme Court Gay Marriage Opinion (Summary)
Feel free to explain how the above argument for gay marriage can be used as justification to marry a woman and her dog as you suggest. I'll wait.