Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: manc
every argument used for homos to marry can be used for any other kind of marraige.

Now that's just silly.

Equal protection demands that laws treat alike all people who are “similarly situated with respect to the legitimate purposes of the law.” “ ‘[S]imilarly situated’ cannot mean simply ‘similar in the possession of the classifying trait.’ All members of any class are similarly situated in this respect, and consequently, any classification whatsoever would be reasonable by this test.” Likewise, “similarly situated” cannot be interpreted to require plaintiffs be identical in every way to people treated more favorably by the law. “No two people or groups of people are the same in every way, and nearly every equal protection claim could be run aground [under] a threshold analysis” that requires the two groups “be a mirror image of one another.” Rather, equal protection demands that the law itself must be equal. It requires that laws treat all those who are similarly situated with respect to the purposes of the law alike. Thus, the purposes of the law must be referenced for a meaningful evaluation.

The purpose of Iowa’s marriage law is to provide an institutional basis for defining the fundamental relational rights and responsibilities of persons in committed relationships. It also serves to recognize the status of the parties’ committed relationship. In this case, the court concluded, plaintiffs are similarly situated compared to heterosexual persons; they are in committed relationships and official recognition of their status provides an institutional basis for defining their fundamental relational rights and responsibilities.
Iowa Supreme Court Gay Marriage Opinion (Summary)

Feel free to explain how the above argument for gay marriage can be used as justification to marry a woman and her dog as you suggest. I'll wait.

137 posted on 04/08/2009 10:24:40 AM PDT by Condorman (Prefer infinitely the company of those seeking the truth to those who believe they have found it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: Condorman

do you not see it yes or no

their privacy,,
love each other
have a right to marry
what other B/S
not hurting me

every argument can be sued for a man to marry 5 women
mother marry her son
brother marry her daughter

so again seeing as you are having an hard time answering

yes or no

do you see it????????????


138 posted on 04/08/2009 10:28:03 AM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson