[freedumb2003]

>>As usual those who disagree do not bring their evidence, they attack the scholars and others who have proof of their findings. Just like they do to those who disagree with the global warming hysteria.

Did you set fire to a chickenwire cage as well?

That has been debunked so many times, it is unbelievable. The apparent similarity of a carved icon to a dinosaur is hardly “proof.” It probably resembles a small animal from the area. There have been carvings of dragons, unicorns, elves and the like. Does that mean they lived contemporaneous with man?

Strawmen can be fun to watch as the flame up.

At least respect your reading audience enough to not post urban myths. I have a very specific challenge out there. Provide me a list of at least 10,000 life scientists (the minimum value for “many” of the millions of practicing life scientists in the world) who have stated they think TToE is not correct.

Do not post nonsense, do not attempt to shunt the discussion. Put up or shut up.

Also, please post the alternate SCIENTIFIC theory to replace it.

[Ev Reeman]

God created the Heavens and the Earth and as He also created all the sciences as well as man himself He can use those same sciences or change them as He wishes.

[OneVike]

That has been debunked so many times, it is unbelievable.

No it hasn't, there has been futile attempts to debunk the proof of dinosaurs being around when men where but never have they done more then write a paper with their opinion. An opinion of a drawing is just that, an opinion.

As for looking at the evidence, why do you refuse to look at the evidence these scientists have?

As for those who say there are thousands of scientists who believe in evolution against the hundreds who do not, that is a straw dog argument.

There are thousands, and thousands of well known scientists who claim man has caused global warming, compared to much much less that disagree. So are you telling me because of consensus we must believe in global warming also?

Why is you people will not use the same logic you use against global warming as you do on evolution and dating methods?