To: MrB
And Creation theory doesn't reject the idea of change within species in response to environmental pressures, either, so there is no argument there.Acutally, Creationists would have a little problem with ring species, wouldn't they?
To: sometime lurker
In the examples of ring species I know of, salamanders turn into salamanders, and sea gulls turn into sea gulls. Creationists wouldn't have a problem with this.
One kind turning into another kind is another matter.
79 posted on
03/27/2009 9:32:40 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(American Revolution II -- overdue)
To: sometime lurker
You mean the finch beaks?
The populations that returned to “normal” after whatever temporary climate variation was over?
Nope, no problem with that.
88 posted on
03/27/2009 10:45:36 AM PDT by
MrB
(irreconcilable: One of two or more conflicting ideas or beliefs that cannot be brought into harmony.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson