Posted on 03/25/2009 5:17:10 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Twenty years ago this week, a pair of previously unknown scientists stunned the world by announcing they'd done the impossible by achieving nuclear fusion in a lab flask at room temperature.
Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons quickly became celebrities as the news media hailed them for discovering a cheap source of nearly limitless power. But it all fell apart as other scientists couldn't duplicate their results, and the pair later admitted they'd made mistakes in the experiments.
Now a U.S. Navy researcher, speaking on the anniversary of and in the same city where they made their announcement, thinks Fleischmann and Pons may have been right.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Take it to the bank. If someone was to find a way to generate an infinite amount of energy from the air, it would be done.
Maybe not in America right away (though even that I don’t believe) but certainly somewhere. Russia. China. South Korea. Japan.
Somewhere a technology for infinite free energy would be used.
If you deny that, you’re a dreamer on the scale of John Lennon.
‘kay I get it. This is thread reborn because of the recently reported variability of nuclear decay rates based on solar cycle. ‘strue?
I don´t really recall anyone the scientific community ¨renouncing¨ them. It´s just that their results could not be reproduced.
Now round 2?
>> But it all fell apart as other scientists couldn’t duplicate their results
I remember that. Something to do with some kind of chocolate snack contamination.
Ping me.
Thanks for the ping. Kinda old, though...
The future of nuclear is cold fusion.
Re-Analysis of the Marinov Light-Speed Anisotropy Experiment
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2270920/posts
Friday, June 12, 2009 11:25:41 PM · by Kevmo · 27 replies · 1,027+ views
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0612/0612201v2.pdf ^ | Reginald T. Cahill
The Suppression of Inconvenient Facts in Physics
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2266921/posts
Sunday, June 07, 2009 7:50:26 PM · by Kevmo · 78 replies · 1,626+ views
Suppressed Science.Net ^ | 12/06/08 | http://www.suppressedscience.net/
The End of Snide Remarks Against Cold Fusion
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2265914/posts
Friday, June 05, 2009 5:56:08 PM · by Kevmo · 95 replies · 1,770+ views
Free Republic, Gravitronics.net and Intrade ^ | 6/5/09 | kevmo, et al
‘Cold Fusion’ Rebirth? New Evidence For Existence Of Controversial Energy Source
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2212864/posts
Monday, March 23, 2009 12:42:14 PM · by FlameThrower · 35 replies · 1,586+ views
Science Daily ^ | Mar. 23, 2009 | American Chemical Society
:’) My pleasure.
‘Strue. You win this week’s prize, a dozen electrons! ;’)
Let’s see it duplicated repeatedly, by several other laboratories.
Then we’ll talk.
Meg Ryan. Mmmmmmmmm!
( the earlier, pre-facelift one)
Just saying...
Good movie. Also that one in Russia, with “The Saint”
Fermions? But I need bosons!
Mrs. Smith’s. They’re frozen, perfect material for the experiment.
I object to the fact that the Strong Nuclear Force and Weak Nuclear Force have been studied inside out, but no research has ever been done in the Average Nuclear Force. That just sucks.
It’s been done. Let’s talk.
Couldn't find it, so would you please provide a link for us all?
New, reproducible results.
Let’s start with this article. And let me know how much money you’re willing to put on the table.
How I Made Money from Cold Fusion
Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:28:49 PM · by Kevmo · 24 replies · 1,013+ views
Exclusive Article for Free Republic | 1/23/10 | Kevmo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.