Something worth considering...
Has Dr. Taitz spoken to any of the other attorneys whose cases were “distributed for Conference” and then rejected? Is it possible that some of those other suits were tampered with, or hidden the way Lightfoot v. Bowen was? I remember Donofrio mentioning something about clerks as well, but can’t recall off-hand.
I just hope those charged with overseeing the clerks in SCOTUS (as well as the Justices themselves) are aware that there are possibly OTHER cases that have been tampered with as well...
>>>Has Dr. Taitz spoken to any of the other attorneys whose cases were “distributed for Conference” and then rejected?
Other cases mentioned here:
http://defendourfreedoms.org/Dossier3.htm
>>>are aware that there are possibly OTHER cases that have been tampered with as well...
::ponders:: Like Terry Schiavos