[GodGunsGuts]

Quote of the Day:

"Micromutations do occur, but the theory that these alone can account for evolutionary change is either falsified, or else it is an unfalsifiable, hence metaphysical theory. I suppose that nobody will deny that it is a great misfortune if an entire branch of science becomes addicted to a false theory. But this is what has happened in biology: ... I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science. When this happens many people will pose the question: How did this ever happen?"

S Lovtrup, Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth

[scottinoc]

So far not a single instance of one species morphing into another species. Kind of contrary to logic anyway, even if you don’t believe in a creator. But that won’t stop the evolution religion from aserting itself as the only truth.

[stormer]

Two points: Evolution is directionless, not “upward”, and if there is a change in allele frequency due to environmental stresses, evolution has taken place. The author is wrong.

[ExtremeUnction]

Evolution happens.

[Liberty1970]

I think the big point of confusion that most non-creationists are stuck on is the assumption that any observation of change is automatically evidence for wholesale evolution by purely natural processes with all life coming from a single common ancestor. But that's like saying that the world must be flat because your front yard is flat.

We observe a variety of evolutionary change, so properly speaking all informed creationists are "evolutionists." The difference is that we do not have blind faith in the omnipotence of chance + natural selection. With the help of science we can map out what is and is not possible for evolutionary mechanisms to perform. Anything above that threshhold is, in our experience, the results of an intelligent designer.

This is why we believe the clothing we are wearing was intelligently designed, for example - not because we've seen the factory or the clothing designer at work, but because we all know and accept that nature doesn't produce blue jeans and shirts by itself. (If you say it's because you read the clothing tag, dear reader, I'll tear the tag off and paste it to a rock - do you then believe the rock was intelligently designed?)

[chuck_the_tv_out]

No different than a selective breeding program.

"300 generations" proves the information was already IN the DNA, not a mutation. The information was selected out.

[Don Corleone]

the broad Darwinian philosophy that life continually evolves upward...

Until it reaches the US Congress where it rapidly goes into retrograde!!!

[Cedric]

The Darwinists promised us bones & fossils, millions of bones & fossils and, yet, this is what they’ve been reduced to - (intentionally) misinterpreted, adapting bacteria experiments.

Pathetic.

[autumnraine]

Adaption or evolution?

[jonno]

crevo bookmark

[DoctorMichael]

Warning!
This is a Meta-article that contains
no site-specific scientifc data or research whatsoever
and is produced by a member of an obscure, unrecognized, non-scientific
internet group attempting to pass off his agenda as scholarly.
They are not constituted to provide proof of Creationism but instead
merely to snipe snidely and spam the internet with their Trollisms.
Buyer Beware!"