six states have prohibitions and the 11th DCA has upheld FL’s prohibition of homosexual adoption.
This is about the homosexual using full faith and credit to push their pointless lifestyle upon the other states. The state should only be required to list the legal father of those two homoseuals and the mother is listed as “unknown”. This is a birth record. The guardianship can be the homosexual’s sex partner.
Sorry but the law was a legislative creation. There is no adoption at common law and thus this is narrowly construed. The purpose of altering the birth certificate is to CONCEAL the original mother and the original father. It is about the legislatures desire on society not about you as an adopted child.
It is all about who adopted you. Adoption essentially creates a new bloodline via a legal graft. It is also about the adoptive mother and the adoptive father to be secure in the adoption that the child will never discover the truth unless told. (or something medical causes a revalation)
Homosexuals by the very nature of their behavior have no such ability or validity. As an adopteee you have no rights to find out your biological past absent a court order to find out who your mother or who your father was.
“This is a birth record.”
Do you realize how funny that sounds to me? You want this child’s BIRTH certificate to state his MOTHER is “UNKNOWN”. This is rich...
OK, now I really am taking a break. I MAY come back once I’ve gotten some air, but I don’t wish to start fights with my fellow conservatives right now when we are dealing with much bigger issues in Washington at the moment...
help me please.
what has been the verdict of those two homo’s down in the keys who got a judge to let them adopt a child while ignoring our state law.
I’ve been away for quite a time