Typical liberal tactic, establish what will be the interpretation of the Constitution by concensus of the loudest voices, like you. When the Subpreme Court settles the Constitutional meaning of natural born citizen as it applies to the eligibility for president, THEN you will be relevant. Until then, making empty claims is merely your specious opinion.
Second
I have made a very logical, very legal, very understandable argument which you have failed to refute, or even answer very effectively.
Natural Born Citizen is the Opposite of Naturalized Citizen.
Can you show me where anyone, with any authority, disagrees with me on this point?
If you are a Citizen, and you were NOT Naturalized, You are, most likely, a Natural Born Citizen.
The ONLY exceptions would be for those who Congress has retroactively granted Citizenship. However, for those select people, I do not think that “Natural Born Citizen” applies, as they were not citizens at the exact moment or time of Birth.
My position has been consistent and sound, on EVERY “birther” thread. There is NO way that you can call me a “liberal” on this issue.
I want Obama to produce his Passport, his College Admission Records and a Certified Copy of his Original Birth Certificate.
How in the world can you call me a “liberal” while I hold all of these positions?