1 posted on
03/12/2009 10:18:30 AM PDT by
euram
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: euram
My blood pressure is going thru the roof now!.................
2 posted on
03/12/2009 10:19:18 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(The Zero has more Chicago Bull than Michael Jordan...................)
To: euram
You gotta be kidding me........
3 posted on
03/12/2009 10:19:55 AM PDT by
caver
(Obama's first goals: allow more killing of innocents and allow the killers of innocents to go free.)
To: euram
I thought liberals wanted free healthcare?
4 posted on
03/12/2009 10:20:50 AM PDT by
mainestategop
(MAINE: The way communism should be)
To: euram; SandRat
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat kind of shineola is Shineski hawking here???
5 posted on
03/12/2009 10:20:59 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(May God save America from its government; this is no time for Obamateurs. Emmanuel = Haldeman?)
To: euram
Yet, 900 million for Hamas to...get well.
[every word in the book]
6 posted on
03/12/2009 10:21:03 AM PDT by
rvoitier
(O.B.A.M.A. - One Big-Ass Mistake, America)
To: euram
9 posted on
03/12/2009 10:22:04 AM PDT by
GeronL
(....and I won't let it happen again!)
To: euram
10 posted on
03/12/2009 10:22:05 AM PDT by
Semper Mark
(Communism is Socialism with a gun to your head.)
To: euram
But the proposal would be "dead on arrival" if it's sent to Congress, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Washington, said. Murray used that blunt terminology when she told Shinseki that the idea would not be acceptable and would be rejected if formally proposed. Her remarks came during a hearing before the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs about the 2010 budget.
12 posted on
03/12/2009 10:22:14 AM PDT by
Islander7
(If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
To: euram
He hates anyone and anything that has to do with defending this country.
He needs to rot in hell.
13 posted on
03/12/2009 10:22:20 AM PDT by
Canedawg
(Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.)
To: euram
serves them right for being despicable military types...
15 posted on
03/12/2009 10:22:44 AM PDT by
Vaquero
( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: euram
If Bush had proposed that, imagine the screaming headlines.
18 posted on
03/12/2009 10:23:31 AM PDT by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
21 posted on
03/12/2009 10:24:00 AM PDT by
lonevoice
(This tagline is identical to the one you are reading)
To: euram
24 posted on
03/12/2009 10:25:42 AM PDT by
Mark was here
(The earth is bipolar.)
To: euram
nObama, you are not my President
To: euram; Admin Moderator
Mods, please move to Breaking News.
30 posted on
03/12/2009 10:28:20 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective.)
To: euram
The day Obama starts paying rent and board at the White House!
To: euram
meanwhile politicians in washington reap the best medical care at hand on the taxpayers dime right?
To: euram
I am employed with health insurance. When I go to the VA they routinely bill my private carrier.
35 posted on
03/12/2009 10:31:20 AM PDT by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: euram
Just what Obama wants to do piss off people that know how to kill people and break things.....
Bill Ayers was a hobbyist compared to America’s Veterans.
37 posted on
03/12/2009 10:33:40 AM PDT by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
To: euram
Its the insurance subrogation thing. Every payer wants to be second in line. It doesn't necessarily mean denying coverage or substantially changing the veterans' out of pocket costs. However, the more back and forths there are, the longer it takes for payment and the more stressful it is.
Making companies debate responsibility with the government for service-related injuries is going to ultimately be treated like prior health issues and raise private insurance costs for all veterans, since it would decrease the insurer's ability to estimate them. If the injury occurred when the soldier was an agent of the government, it is the government's (i.e., our) duty to insure him. It's not like soldiers are overpaid for the risks.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson