Making numerous references to U.S. Constitution?
Isn't this a profiling?
Now Al Qaeda of the world have enough time and opportunity to plan the next mass terrorist attack, while G-men are busying fighting these 'domestic terrorists.' This kind of misguided priority would be just the thing which would invite nuke-terrorism on U.S. soil.
Hmmmm,
It looks like the ONLY group not listed is ACORN . . .
Hey guys, check out the WH and Capitol Hill!
Does this definition expand enough to include those who believe:
"...marriage is a right, not a privilege..."?
I didn't think so.
This thing has been around for a decade, it goes back to ‘99 during the Clintoon administration. But it was for real, AFAIK.
Well, I guess that at least half the folks on this site fall into one or more of those categories.
So this is what it’s come to. “Defending the US Constitution against the federal government and the UN” is now grounds to get you labeled an “extremist”.
And what on earth is “Christian Identity” doing on that list? Why is a Terrorism Task Force interested in that?
Take note, people. We are truly in a major historical period.
Gee...no illegal alien gang groups on that list? Ni MS-13, Zetas?
Three big flags:
1) Lone Individuals
— So, being a loner is indicative of being a terrorist?
2) Groups of Individuals engaged in para-military training.
— So, National Guard training, and even militia and re-enactment groups are terrorists?
3) Christian Identity
— So, Identifying with the Savior in your religion (assuming that you are Christian) means you are a terrorist? (It has been said that there cannot be Christianity w/o Christ.)
I like the hammers from The Wall. ;)
Right Wing Extremists
and the
Hate Groups
So what’s this “defenders of the U.S. Constitution against the federal government and U.N.” crap mean?
Traitors.