Posted on 03/08/2009 7:19:57 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
Obviously the changes won’t stick. But what cannot be altered can certainly be disrupted.
This is a call for a form of online civil disobedience. worldnetdaily’s already on-board, soon others will cover this as well.
Wikipedia: the online reference resource of the Ministry of Truth. Copyright: 1984. Published in London, Airstrip One.
Thanks for the ping, LucyT.
Somehow I knew a FReeper would have saved that. Didn’t know who until now. Thank you, ETL and stay safe.
BTW, the bio on the link is wrong. Annenberg was appointed ambassador to England in 1969, by Nixon, not 1968.
Apparently, according to the Obama campaign, In 1981 -- the year Obama transferred from Occidental College to Columbia University -- Obama visited his mother and sister Maya in Indonesia. After that visit, Obama traveled to Pakistan with a friend from college whose family was from there. The Obama campaign says Obama was in Pakistan for about three weeks, staying with his friend's family in Karachi and also visiting Hyderabad in Southern India.
The traitors at Wikipedia should tell you everything you need to know. Our country has been infiltrated. Absent ardent and uncompromising resistance from patriots, they will eliminate all hope “that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”
They’ll delete this stuff but leave the ‘Bush Conspiracy on 9/11’ up. Simply amazing....
The brainwashed maggots only will understand their place in the Party, or in a gulag...there is no in-between for the Marxist Media.
Little of what I have on Wright, Ayers or Obama's other communist associations, comes from wikipedia, although they actually are often a terrific source for information on these far left individuals and groups, as well as for many other subjects. Nearly everything there is linked to a published source. I'm not sure who started this rumor that they couldn't be trusted. If you look at the wiki excerpts I do have on my FR page, you'd be hard-pressed to say they were 'covering' for the left. Sure, they have pieces that DO omit or slant, but, by and large, they are pretty good, based on my experiences in researching this stuff.
Oops! Forgot to say you’re welcome. :)
which makes sense for the governemtn to ban lead in ink and force books to be destroyed.
wikipedia can be changed on whim.
we need a deeper way to do a non left wing looney wikipedia.
What about the individual entry of Ayers and Wright?
They may have protected obama’s entry but they can’t protected all the collateral entries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.