Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Left Turn:Centrists fear that the president's budget reveals his liberal leanings
National Journal ^ | March.7, 2009 | Stuart Taylor

Posted on 03/06/2009 8:18:35 AM PST by Reagan Man

Having praised President Obama's job performance in two recent columns, it is with regret that I now worry that he may be deepening what looks more and more like a depression and may engineer so much spending, debt, and government control of the economy as to leave most Americans permanently less prosperous and less free.

Other Obama-admiring centrists have expressed similar concerns. Like them, I would like to be proved wrong. After all, if this president fails, who will revive our economy? And when? And what kind of America will our children inherit?

But with the nation already plunging deep into probably necessary debt to rescue the crippled financial system and stimulate the economy, Obama's proposals for many hundreds of billions in additional spending on universal health care, universal postsecondary education, a massive overhaul of the energy economy, and other liberal programs seem grandiose and unaffordable.

With little in the way of offsetting savings likely to materialize, the Obama agenda would probably generate trillion-dollar deficits with no end in sight, or send middle-class taxes soaring to record levels, or both.

All this from a man who told the nation last week that he doesn't "believe in bigger government" and who promised tax cuts for 95 percent of Americans.

The president's suggestions that all the necessary tax increases can be squeezed out of the richest 2 percent are deceptive and likely to stir class resentment. And his apparent cave-ins to liberal interest groups may change the country for the worse.

Such concerns may help explain why the Dow Jones industrial average plunged 17 percent from the morning of Inauguration Day (8,280) to its close on March 4 (6,876). The markets have also been deeply shaken by Obama's alarming failure to come up with a clear plan for fixing the crippled financial system -- which has loomed since his election four months ago as by far his most urgent challenge -- or for working with foreign leaders to arrest the meltdown of the world economy.

The house is burning down. It's no time to be watering the grass.

This is not to deny that the liberal wish list in Obama's staggering $3.6 trillion budget would be wonderful if we had limitless resources. But in the real world, it could put vast areas of the economy under permanent government mismanagement, kill millions of jobs, drive investors and employers overseas, and bankrupt the nation.

Meanwhile, liberal Democrats in Congress are racing to gratify their interest groups in a slew of ways likely to do much more harm than good: pushing a union-backed "card-check" bill that would bypass secret-ballot elections on unionization and facilitate intimidation of reluctant workers; slipping into the stimulus package a formula to reimburse states that increase welfare dependency among single mothers and reduce their incentives to work; defunding a program that now pays for the parents of some 1,700 poor kids to choose private schools over crumbling D.C. public schools; fencing out would-be immigrants with much-needed skills.

Not to mention the $7.7 billion in an omnibus spending bill to pay for 9,000 earmarks of the kind that Obama campaigned against: $1.7 million for research on pig odors in Iowa; $1.7 million for a honeybee factory in Texas; $819,000 for research on catfish genetics in Alabama; $2 million to promote astronomy in Hawaii; $650,000 to manage beavers in North Carolina and Mississippi; and many more.

Meanwhile, the stimulus package is stuffed with spending such as "the $88.6 million for new construction for Milwaukee public schools, which, reports the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, have shrinking enrollment, 15 vacant schools, and, quite logically, no plans for new construction," in the words of conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer.

Obama can take credit for keeping campaign promises (which he might have been wiser to defer) on health care, energy, and more, and for ending some of George W. Bush's budget gimmickry. But he has been deceptive in basing his deficit projections on phantom expenditure cuts and wildly optimistic revenue estimates, and in proclaiming "a new era of responsibility" to be paid for by raising taxes only on "the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans."

The numbers don't add up -- and still won't if and when, as seems almost certain, Obama ratchets up his so-far-fairly-modest new taxes on the top 2 percent. "A tax policy that confiscated 100 percent of the taxable income of everyone in America earning over $500,000 in 2006 would only have given Congress an extra $1.3 trillion in revenue," according to a February 27 editorial in The Wall Street Journal. "That's less than half the 2006 federal budget of $2.7 trillion and looks tiny compared to the more than $4 trillion Congress will spend in fiscal 2010. Even taking every taxable 'dime' of everyone earning more than $75,000 in 2006 would have barely yielded enough to cover that $4 trillion."

As for the budget's $2 trillion in projected net "savings," Obama's budget director, Peter Orszag, admitted in testimony on Tuesday under questioning by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., that $1.6 trillion comes from phantom cuts of the money that would be needed to sustain the troop surge in Iraq for another decade -- money that nobody ever intended to spend.

Other supposed savings -- especially from Medicare -- seem unlikely to materialize absent benefit cuts, which Obama has not proposed. And the cost of any health care legislation -- to be drafted largely by a Congress that is allergic to the kind of cost-cutting necessary to make universal care sustainable -- is likely to be two or three times the $634 billion over 10 years that Obama has budgeted.

Meanwhile, "politics trumps economics" in Obama's housing program, says Washington Post columnist Robert Samuelson. It targets tax credits narrowly on first-time homebuyers with weak credit ratings while creating few incentives for the more affluent and credit-worthy people who have the collective buying power to revive the housing market. Obama also supports a "cram-down" proposal -- authorizing bankruptcy judges to unilaterally cut distressed homeowners' payments -- that would be hopelessly unadministrable at best and might drive up mortgage rates.

Small wonder that liberal commentators who complained about Obama's initial stabs at bipartisanship are ecstatic about his budget. And small wonder that some centrists who have had high hopes for Obama -- including New York Times columnist David Brooks, my colleague Clive Crook, David Gergen, and Christopher Buckley -- are sounding alarms.

In a March 3 column headed "A Moderate Manifesto," Brooks wrote: "Those of us who consider ourselves moderates -- moderate conservative, in my case -- are forced to confront the reality that Barack Obama is not who we thought he was. His words are responsible; his character is inspiring. But his actions betray a transformational liberalism that should put every centrist on notice.... The only thing more scary than Obama's experiment is the thought that it might fail and the political power will swing over to a Republican Party that is currently unfit to wield it.... [We] thus find ourselves facing a void. We moderates are going to have to assert ourselves. We're going to have to take a centrist tendency that has been politically feckless and intellectually vapid and turn it into an influential force."

Exactly right, except perhaps the "intellectually vapid" part. But turning centrist values into an influential political force will take some doing. Although almost 30 percent of Americans call themselves political independents, the political and intellectual classes are so ideologically polarized that resurgent Democratic liberals and wounded Republican conservatives get most of the media attention.

With the Republican Party in ruins and dominated by such hard-right conservatives as Rush Limbaugh, no center-right figure on the scene today has the stature to lead a loyal opposition against a popular president who puts a moderate face and an eloquent voice on an ambitiously liberal ideology.

Fortunately, a dozen or so centrist Democrats in the Senate are voicing concerns about the more profligate spending proposals. Together with the Senate's three centrist Republicans, they could hold back the liberal tide and appeal to the more moderate angels of Obama's nature.

I still hold out hope that Obama is not irrevocably "casting his lot with collectivists and statists," as asserted by Peter Wehner, a former Bush aide and a leading conservative intellectual now with the Ethics and Public Policy Center, in Commentary magazine's blog Contentions.

And I hope that the president ponders well Margaret Thatcher's wise warning against some collectivist conceits, in a 1980 speech quoted by Wehner: "The illusion that government can be a universal provider, and yet society still stay free and prosperous.... The illusion that every loss can be covered by a subsidy. The illusion that we can break the link between reward and effort, and still get the effort."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bho2009; bho44; bhobudget; bhoeconoamy; bhoeconomy; democrats; economy; obama; obamanomics; socialism; stuarttaylor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
>>>>>Centrists fear that the president's budget reveals his liberal leanings.

Lets hope so.

1 posted on 03/06/2009 8:18:35 AM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

who will revive our economy?

Uh......maybe the private sector? Those that understand business?


2 posted on 03/06/2009 8:22:19 AM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Obama has told ANYONE WHO WAS LISTENING just what he intended to do.

But instead, what the sheeple heard was what the adoring MEDIA said he wanted to do. Now, they are learning that they were two VERY different things.

This is just like Germany in 1934. And it’s unfolding the same way.


3 posted on 03/06/2009 8:23:07 AM PST by tcrlaf ("Hope" is the most Evil of all Evils"-Neitzsche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

He just finding that out? He must have head his head stuck down in the sand.


4 posted on 03/06/2009 8:23:24 AM PST by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Centrists fear right.


5 posted on 03/06/2009 8:24:47 AM PST by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

THe a**holes who thought Obama was a centrist - including most of the GOP - deserve to live in a marxist hell. They are fortunate that conservatives may save them from that fate. At least we are trying to do so.


6 posted on 03/06/2009 8:29:17 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
All this from a man who told the nation last week that he doesn't "believe in bigger government" and who promised tax cuts for 95 percent of Americans.

In Washington, when spending increases are only twice as much more than a previous year instead of three times as much, it is called Draconian budget cuts.

When the Magic Nero says he will cut taxes, it means taxes will only go up twice as much and not three times as much.

7 posted on 03/06/2009 8:29:36 AM PST by N. Theknow (No self discipline. No self government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Brooks wrote: "...We moderates are going to have to assert ourselves. We're going to have to take a centrist tendency that has been politically feckless and intellectually vapid and turn it into an influential force."

Yeah, that's the ticket! You can call it radical squish.

8 posted on 03/06/2009 8:30:09 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (American Revolution II -- overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The problem is, they're dragging us all into their marxist hellhole.
9 posted on 03/06/2009 8:30:49 AM PST by highlander_UW (The only difference between the MSM and the DNC is the MSM sells ad space in their propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

LEANINGS?


10 posted on 03/06/2009 8:31:37 AM PST by SolidWood (Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

No, we are going to drag the country OUT of it. No matter what it takes.


11 posted on 03/06/2009 8:32:56 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

gee, ya think so? I’m sooo glad I’m not one of the IDIOTS who voted for him.


12 posted on 03/06/2009 8:33:38 AM PST by Marysecretary (.GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Damn straight, ant.


13 posted on 03/06/2009 8:34:13 AM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man; All
...Together with the Senate's three centrist Republicans...


Must be a MSM PC way of describing outright RINOs. /s

14 posted on 03/06/2009 8:34:19 AM PST by az_gila (AZ - need less democrats - one Governor down... more to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
But with the nation already plunging deep into probably necessary debt to rescue the crippled financial system and stimulate the economy

Probably necessary?

This twit probably thinks stepping on the gas is good when you drive over a cliff.

15 posted on 03/06/2009 8:35:09 AM PST by N. Theknow (No self discipline. No self government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
The house is burning down. It's no time to be watering the grass.

Taylor is waking up, but he still hasn't realized that his Pres__ent isn't watering anything. He's emptying a gas can.

16 posted on 03/06/2009 8:38:50 AM PST by taraytarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
Centrists fear that the president's budget reveals his liberal leanings.

Liberal leanings? When do you think these "centrist" sheeple will discover they elected a flat-out Marxist as Leader of the Free World?

17 posted on 03/06/2009 8:42:22 AM PST by nutmeg (DemocRATs: The party of tax cheats and other assorted crooks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

So many who should have known better got taken in by BO’s words and ignored his actions and associations. I guess they were too busy patting themselves on the back for supporting a “historical” black guy. How could they have been SO STUPID???

I’ve seen people since explain BO’s words by saying “oh, that was campaign talk” as if lying through your teeth while trying to get elected is no biggie. But he’s still lying “there’s a bankruptcy every 30 seconds caused by health care costs” is a whopper from this week. At least a few of the MSM reported this one.


18 posted on 03/06/2009 8:42:32 AM PST by Aria ( "The US republic will endure until Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the people's $.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Glad you finally pulled your head out Stewart!


19 posted on 03/06/2009 8:43:40 AM PST by Danae (Amerikan Unity My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

To quote Brother Malcolm, “You’ve been hoodwinked. You’ve been had. You’ve been took. You’ve been led astray, led amok. You’ve been bamboozled.”


20 posted on 03/06/2009 8:45:02 AM PST by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson