Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alexander Hamilton, Modern America’s Founding Father
City Journal ^ | Winter 2009 | Myron Magnet

Posted on 03/01/2009 6:35:25 PM PST by neverdem

How New York’s opportunity society became America’s

We New Yorkers imagine our city’s history begins in earnest with the Gilded Age and the Great Migration that brought many of our forebears sailing under the Statue of Liberty’s torch to supercharge a nascent metropolis with a jolt of new energy. But this summer, when a handful of square-bearded, antique-garbed Pennsylvania German Baptists jacked a yellow clapboard house up over a Harlem church and wheeled it around the corner to a new site in St. Nicholas Park, we recalled that more than a century earlier Gotham took center stage as the nation’s first capital. For the house belonged to Alexander Hamilton—not only one of the greatest Founding Fathers but the one who stamped the infant republic forever with the unique spirit of New York City.

The other Founders were Americans of a century’s standing, who fought the Revolution to defend liberties their families had claimed for generations. Washington and Jefferson, landed grandees, descended from seventeenth-century Virginians; Harvard-educated John Adams’s forebears settled in Massachusetts Bay in 1638. Such men were rooted Americans, living on land inherited from their fathers. Hamilton, by contrast, was a penniless immigrant from the West Indies; like so many New Yorkers, he had come here from elsewhere, seeking his fortune.

And he wasn’t just penniless. “My birth,” as he delicately put it, “is the subject of the most humiliating criticism”—for he was, in John Adams’s acidulous taunt, “the bastard brat of a Scotch pedlar.” Nevertheless, as a prime exemplar of that American opportunity and enterprise he so fervently promoted, he rose to be the country’s second most powerful man. As Ron Chernow puts it in his indispensable biography, he served in effect as George Washington’s prime minister and head of government, directing his administration’s policy and molding the enduring institutions...

(Excerpt) Read more at city-journal.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alexanderhamilton; foundingfathers; godsgravesglyphs; hamilton; jacklew; money; nancylindborg; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

National Portrait Gallery,
Smithsonian Institution/Art Resource, NY
Alexander Hamilton’s family thought James Sharples’s pastel profile, drawn just after Hamilton stepped down as Treasury secretary, the most accurate of all the many portraits of him.
1 posted on 03/01/2009 6:35:25 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

FF ping


2 posted on 03/01/2009 6:37:34 PM PST by NonValueAdded (May God save America from its government; this is no time for Obamateurs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Alexander Hamilton An American Statesman and Artilleryman

Fort George, New York

3 posted on 03/01/2009 6:56:51 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I have no respect for Hamilton. He was so obsessed with raising money that he helped facilitate acceptance of the Constitution's poison pill.
4 posted on 03/01/2009 7:01:47 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Alexander Hamilton, Modern America’s Founding Father

That may be true, but the man was a sh!t head (which says a lot about "Modern America"). Consider Mr. Hamilton's proposed plan of government:

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/debates_618.asp

"In his [Mr. Hamilton's] private opinion he had no scruple in declaring, supported as he was by the opinions of so many of the wise & good, that the British Govt. was the best in the world [one must ask - what was he doing in America?]: and that he doubted much whether any thing short of it would do in America...As to the [proposed federal] Executive, it seemed to be admitted that no good one could be established on Republican principles [Hamilton was obviously a RINO]. Was not this giving up the merits of the question: for can there be a good Govt. without a good Executive. The English model was the only good one on this subject [RINO!]. The Hereditary interest of the King was so interwoven with that of the Nation, and his personal emoluments so great, that he was placed above the danger of being corrupted from abroad [oh, you betcha]-and at the same time was both sufficiently independent and sufficiently controuled, to answer the purpose of the institution at home...Let one branch of the [federal] Legislature [the Senate] hold their places for life [picture "Dingy" Reid & "Chuck You" Schumer serving for life] or at least during good behaviour. Let the Executive also be for life [please note - Carter is still alive]...[a federal] Executive for life... will therefore be a safer depository of power. It will be objected probably, that such [a federal] Executive will be an elective Monarch, and will give birth to the tumults which characterize that form of Govt. He wd. reply that Monarch is an indefinite term [how Clintonian]..."

5 posted on 03/01/2009 7:05:59 PM PST by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Er, which poison pill?


6 posted on 03/01/2009 7:13:59 PM PST by Dan Middleton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dan Middleton
Er, which poison pill?

This one.

7 posted on 03/01/2009 7:20:28 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Didn't he believe that the Governments accounts should be so convoluted so as to be incapable of making sense of? If so he has succeeded far beyond his wildest dreams.
8 posted on 03/01/2009 7:51:46 PM PST by fella (.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Thank the Lord for Aaron Burr.


9 posted on 03/01/2009 9:51:31 PM PST by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Hamilton was an insidious traitor who did everything he could to undermine the power of the new Constitution. He fought the limitation of the power of the federal government, he fought against the creation of the Bill of Rights, and he fought against staying debt-free. He was a subversive monarchist, and he did incredible damage to our country literally at the moment it was being born. And he did it with thoroughly modern spin techniques - every shred of his efforts was done in the name of freedom (a tactic that continues to allow his name to be protected today). Because of this he was literally reviled by some of the other Founders, and has continued to be reviled by many through history, up to and including today. In fact, he can be directly blamed for establishing the philosophical underpinnings of the legalisms which enable all federal overreaching, as well as the creation of the Federal Reserve. Burr was a hero.

/rant (but I’m not apologizing for it - he was a bastard in more ways than mere birth)


10 posted on 03/01/2009 10:01:58 PM PST by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Burr was the real traitor, and was charged with treason by Thomas Jefferson himself.

Hamilton was a hero.

11 posted on 03/01/2009 10:16:21 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
But for Hamilton, the Constitution would probably not have been written, and we would have been a failed state. Even if it were to have continued and not broken up into warring states under the the correctly mocked Article of Confederation, it would have been an insolvent banana republic(actually third world countries would be called Pine Tree republics or some such), which would have fallen to the British in 1812.
Hamilton devoted his life to this nation and died for it. And half the people on this thread are not worthy to clean his grave.
The left ignores Hamilton's actual writings to lay claim to him. The anti-elitists on the right despise him because they lack the intelligence to read his works. And the grievance mongers calling themselves paleocons despise him, except when they decide they love tariff, only because neocons don't.
12 posted on 03/02/2009 1:11:47 AM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?

The cultists of Ayn Rand follow an ideology foreign to America. Put down the philandering russian and pick up a collection of Hamilton’s works.

You don’t get it either because have not read Hamilton (and selective quoting from a google search doesn’t count) or because sacrifice is unimaginable to you. Hamilton was taking an extreme monarchist position to try to balance the lunacy of the Ant-Federalists and parochial mobs. He was willing to become a pariah to create a stable government.


13 posted on 03/02/2009 1:16:31 AM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yep, its ALLLLLL about NY...Like this republic would not have existed with their undying support and sacrifice to the Union...

(Steve rolls his eyes)

It took a lot of politicking and fake hair pulling to get NY to get with the program, and it was not because they had some great principle dissagreement...There were too many Torrey’s in NY society that weren’t willing to give up their loyalty to the crown...It took everyone at that convention to agree to split, before NY would join in...Such courage...

So yeah, give us your Alexander Hamilton...

I would prefer John Adams and even Thomas Jefferson over AH anyday...


14 posted on 03/02/2009 3:08:37 AM PST by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Well hang on a sec...

I think it is a tragedy that dueling has gone out of style today...

Burr was a pill nonetheless, and Hamilton had his deficiencies, yet we all know why there were problems with both sides of that equation...

Thats why it would be neat to sit back and watch liberals dissagree, and take the dissagreement out on the steps (and capitol ground) and duke it out...Or at least shoot at each other...

Quite entertaining in these times...


15 posted on 03/02/2009 3:12:59 AM PST by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
To understand Hamilton's role in modern society study the Whiskey Rebellion, an uproar he created almost singlehandedly with polices to penalize small time whiskey producers and reward big producers. The Whiskey Tax was to be administered by a bureaucracy almost indistinguishable from the modern IRS and in colonial terms, at least as large, if not larger.

Hamilton may be dead but his legacy lives on in ObamaNation.

Best regards,

16 posted on 03/02/2009 7:50:27 AM PST by Copernicus (California Grandmother view on Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64
Yep, its ALLLLLL about NY...Like this republic would not have existed with their undying support and sacrifice to the Union...
(Steve rolls his eyes)

And like the teenagers he is imitating, Steve is ignorant. There were 120 battles in New York State or the territories later annexed by New York for a reason; we were the linchpin of empire. Had the British captured the state, we would have been cut in half. Had we lost Saratoga, there would be no United States. The deep water harbors or New York, and the later Erie canal were vital to our later growth.
17 posted on 03/02/2009 10:51:52 AM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Maybe you should be careful about the slurs you use, and the selective clipping and pasting you do before you start throwing “ignorance” and “teenager” around...

Obviously you stopped short of how much it took NY to agree to get into the ground floor of this experiment called these United States of America...

Sure, you must think I do not know the trials and tribulations every single state went thru to gain our overall independence from England...How ignorant of an opinion you must have...

So go right ahead and assume some more...I’m sure you’ll not lose sleep over your interpretation of U.S. history...WE could all learn something from you, but that is beside the point...


18 posted on 03/02/2009 2:59:21 PM PST by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy; Perdogg; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
Thanks neverdem. A second ping to Pharmboy. A ping to Perdogg.
...as a prime exemplar of that American opportunity and enterprise he so fervently promoted, he rose to be the country's second most powerful man. As Ron Chernow puts it in his indispensable biography, he served in effect as George Washington's prime minister and head of government, directing his administration's policy and molding the enduring institutions...
Alexander Hamilton drafted George Washington's Farewell Address in 1796.
Google

19 posted on 03/02/2009 3:24:49 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
The cultists of Ayn Rand follow an ideology foreign to America. Put down the philandering russian and pick up a collection of Hamilton’s works.

You don’t get it either because have not read Hamilton (and selective quoting from a google search doesn’t count) or because sacrifice is unimaginable to you. Hamilton was taking an extreme monarchist position to try to balance the lunacy of the Ant-Federalists and parochial mobs. He was willing to become a pariah to create a stable government.

The reference I cited ( http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/debates_618.asp ) was Mr. Hamilton's 'high water mark.' He could have discussed absolutely anything in the world, regarding government, and he elected to suggest that "the British Govt. was the best in the world." You may wish to rationalize his statements - that is obviously your right. But if the convention had actually adopted his 'plan of government' (with a President & the entire Senate serving for life), I doubt he would have complained - no matter what you & your fellow Hamiltonian-big-government "cultists," who obviously "follow an ideology foreign to America," may think...

;>)

20 posted on 03/02/2009 4:54:04 PM PST by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson