Skip to comments.
True Definition of Natural Born Citizen
Townhall ^
| March 1, 2009
| Glenn Flowers
Posted on 03/01/2009 4:35:14 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: Texas Eagle
21
posted on
03/01/2009 5:02:00 PM PST
by
tomkat
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It seems if Obama was really a US citizen, it would have been a very simple gesture to show his birth certificate, but he has chosen to spend thousands of dollars on lawyers to keep from having to produce one. Hmmmmm...I wonder.
To: pankot
I guess after the 2000 elections, they didnt want the hassle.
To: AuH2ORepublican
Sorry you cannot comprehned the simple written word. Reread the essay. This is not about geography it is about citizen parents. Besides, you make an assertion (why the grandfather clause was included) you do not substantiate with anything except your opinion that an anchor baby can be elected president, legitimately. No, they cannot, because the third level of citizenship is specifically about the office of president and a natural born citizen is all that is legitimate, not anchor babies, not naturalized, not non-citizens, only natural born citizens, those with TWO AMERICAN CITIOZEN PARENTS at the time of the birth of that individual.
24
posted on
03/01/2009 5:04:05 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: tomkat
“...and the usurper is making noise about starting an updated version of the SA.”
What is the SA?
25
posted on
03/01/2009 5:05:17 PM PST
by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Complete and utter crap.
The first thing it says is that being born in the US is not enough to be natural born, otherwise the grandfather clause would not be necessary. The writers and delegates, having been born in the US, wanted to be eligible for the presidency, but most were the children of British subjects.
The Founders were not born in the U.S., because THE FREAKING U.S. DID NOT EXIST WHEN THEY WERE BORN.
Secondly, if "being under another jurisdiction" through no action or choice of one's own disqualifies someone from being President, then that empowers Castro, Kim Jong Il, Imanutjob and whoever else in the world to control our presidency by unilaterally granting citizenship to their non-preferred candidate.
There are about a trillion good reasons to oppose Barack Obama, but this persistent lie is not one of them.
26
posted on
03/01/2009 5:05:42 PM PST
by
Sloth
(The tree of liberty desperately needs watering.)
To: sten
"of course, the next step would be blacks rioting, the dollar tanking further, markets collapsing, and then the Constitutional crisis will begin... as they start to roll-back all legislation he has signed, executions orders he issue, and appointments he has made. anyone convicted under laws he signed would be re-tried (i think), and judges he appointed would have their cases re-tried (or thrown out). military personnel performing any aggressive actions overseas would find themselves up for war crimes charges. "
More than once I've see freepers shaking in their boots at the concept of the "black roiting". Maybe it's not meant in such direct terms, but it always seems to be an issue that might cower the rest of us from standing up for the Constitution and the rule of law.
I'm not saying that such an action would not be a formidible force to reckon with, but I'm saying that we fought much stronger and more numerous forces just to be able to draft and ordain the Constitution, without a constitution to depend on in the process.
If this man has lied his way into the Presidency, he has committed fraud - and I as an American don't give a damn what color he is, or how many riots come from it.
The rule of law is the rule of law...there should not be a set of "black laws" and a set of "white laws"...just laws.
EEO and political correctness has made us the slaves in the past 50 years, and I for one am about sick of it. We opted in, and have supported "equal rights", but the pendeleum has flip-flopped too far the other way.
As for the dollar tanking and markets collapsing...well, they're doing that anyway. With CommieBama at the helm, we're not only going to see the markets collapse...WE'RE GOING TO SEE AMERICA COLLAPSE.
We either fight, or we become serfs. It's the individual choice of each American. The "government" is not here to help, they are the problem and the time of "tyranny in government" - predicted in the Constitution by the establishment of the "of, for, and by" the people constitution - has come. This is where the 2nd Amendment kicks in.
And worrying about the coming "Constitutional crises"/????????? If CommiBama is not a legal President, then we are already in a Constitutional crises of the largest magnitude seen since the documents inception.
When are we going to stop sitting around wringing our hands in agony? The forefathers and the Minutemen are not coming back again...we are them now.
Insofar as the markets, it would seem to me that any and all bills (bailouts) signed by commieBama up to this point, would be moot if he is found to be an ineligible President. And, he is not even a Senator anymore...he'd be back to being a Community cellblock organizer.
27
posted on
03/01/2009 5:07:58 PM PST
by
FrankR
(We are only enslaved to the extent of charity (bailout) we receive...think about it.)
To: ansel12
Read the words of Rep. Bingham stating the necessity of two parents who are American citizens at the birth of the child and you get a better picture of why the grandfather clause was aimed at citizenship of the parents, not this specious geography bilge. ...
[[ Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirms the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:
" ... I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents [plural, meaning two] not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen..." (http://americamustknow.com/default.aspx) ]]
28
posted on
03/01/2009 5:08:31 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: penelopesire
29
posted on
03/01/2009 5:09:27 PM PST
by
oprahstheantichrist
(The MSM is a demonic stronghold, PLEASE pray accordingly. 2 Cor. 10:3-5)
To: oprahstheantichrist
OK...duhh.. I am a little slow tonight. Thanks.
30
posted on
03/01/2009 5:10:49 PM PST
by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: penelopesire
31
posted on
03/01/2009 5:10:55 PM PST
by
tomkat
To: tomkat
OK..thanks. Obama apparently brought it up again the other day talking to the troops I heard. This man is bringing change alright and it is horrifying to anyone with a brain.
32
posted on
03/01/2009 5:14:00 PM PST
by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: FrankR
33
posted on
03/01/2009 5:16:36 PM PST
by
oprahstheantichrist
(The MSM is a demonic stronghold, PLEASE pray accordingly. 2 Cor. 10:3-5)
To: penelopesire
What is the SA?
Short answer “Hitler’s Brownshirts”
—
Answer from Wiki:
The De-Sturmabteilung.ogg Sturmabteilung (help·info), abbreviated SA, (German for “Assault detachment” or “Assault section”, usually translated as “stormtroop(er)s”), functioned as a paramilitary organization of the NSDAP the German Nazi party. They played a key role in Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in the 1930s.
SA men were often called “brownshirts”, for the colour of their uniforms, and to distinguish them from the Schutzstaffel (SS), who wore black and brown uniforms (compare the Italian blackshirts).
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“the SCOTUS, has chosen, in violation of the law, not to override the voters that voted for Obama. They are are cowards who violate their sworn oath rather than make an unpopular ruling.”
Cowards.
I never thought I would lose respect for a certain few of the Justices, but how else can I view them except as empty shells of what we thought they were?
35
posted on
03/01/2009 5:20:36 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(Liberals have neither the creativity nor the confidence to understand the truth of conservatism)
To: Texas Fossil
I should have known that..just wasn’t sure what he was referring to. Thanks. I just always call them ‘brownshirts’...LOL
36
posted on
03/01/2009 5:21:22 PM PST
by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Since the founding fathers were not U.S. citizens and they were not born Of U.S. citizens, was anything ever written that would allow them to be president?
37
posted on
03/01/2009 5:21:22 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This author is spot on! Vattel gives the same definition in
Law of Nations, § 212 - 215.
This is the same treatise found in the Constitution's Article 1, Section 8, Clause 10.
38
posted on
03/01/2009 5:21:55 PM PST
by
MamaTexan
(It's time to STAND UP, America!)
To: Texas Eagle
>>Be careful what you wish for. If Present Potato Head is not Constitutionally eligible to be Present of the United States, that also means he is not Constitutionally restricted to serving only two terms.
Completely ilegally incorrect.
39
posted on
03/01/2009 5:22:58 PM PST
by
MindBender26
(The Hellfire Missile is one of the wonderful ways God shows us he loves American Soldiers & Marines)
To: sten
"...blacks rioting, the dollar tanking further, markets collapsing,....:...dogs and cats, living together...."
(Sorry, I had to do that.)
40
posted on
03/01/2009 5:24:58 PM PST
by
oprahstheantichrist
(The MSM is a demonic stronghold, PLEASE pray accordingly. 2 Cor. 10:3-5)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson