Skip to comments.
Specter could be 'toast' in 2010 election, pollster says
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^
| 2009-02-28
| Brad Bumsted
Posted on 03/01/2009 1:13:16 AM PST by rabscuttle385
HARRISBURG -- A new statewide poll shows 53 percent of Pennsylvanians -- and 66 percent of Republicans -- want someone to replace Sen. Arlen Specter.
Asked whether they think Specter, a Philadelphia Republican, has done his job well enough to win re-election or whether they'd prefer a "new person" in that job, registered voters by a 53-38 percent margin said it's time to give someone else a chance, according to the poll by Susquehanna Polling and Research. Eight percent were undecided.
The numbers might reflect Specter's vote as one of three Republican senators who enabled passage of President Obama's $787 billion federal stimulus package, said James Lee, president of Harrisburg-based Susquehanna polling. But they reflect long-standing dissatisfaction among Republican conservatives with Specter's record, he said.
If the election were held today, "in a two-person race, Specter is toast" if his challenger is a credible candidate, Lee said. A race with more candidates likely would improve Specter's chances of winning.
"The senator never comments on polls," said Specter spokeswoman Kate Kelly. "There is only one that counts."
The poll surveyed 700 registered voters from Monday through Thursday. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.
(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 111th; arlenspecter; pa2010; pagop; porkulus; rino; specter; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: rabscuttle385
Unless the people can crush ACORN before they overwhelm our election process in such a way that the socialists can never be defeated, it may not make a difference by 2010.
21
posted on
03/01/2009 3:22:20 AM PST
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: rabscuttle385
Wouldn’t mid seeing Specter in the graveyard by 2010.
Not very Christian is it?
22
posted on
03/01/2009 3:34:41 AM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: rabscuttle385
Steele, head of the RNC said he would send money and support to any candidate that the local Republicans supported. If the local idiots that have been backing Specter tell the RNC that they want the RINO back, the RNC will back him.
23
posted on
03/01/2009 4:08:02 AM PST
by
liliesgrandpa
(Just out of curiosity, is there any possible GOP candidate that is too repugnant for you to support?)
To: liliesgrandpa
I hope Steele didnt really mean that, for if Spectre is the Republican candidate in Pa. I will send a donation to the Democrat. Yes: Spectre is that bad.
24
posted on
03/01/2009 4:38:40 AM PST
by
Venturer
To: chuck_the_tv_out
To be replaced by a Democrat. Nothing to cheer about even though Specter might get his just desserts.
25
posted on
03/01/2009 4:40:21 AM PST
by
saganite
(What would Sully do?)
To: FFranco
Santorum ENDORSED him over Toomey. Ricky won’t run against him.
26
posted on
03/01/2009 4:43:19 AM PST
by
nonliberal
(Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
To: ncweaver
Santorum is an insider politico who showed it with his support of Specter, even when Arlen ran for president in 1996.
Santorum is in the water right now and might be trying a political comeback.
But I’ve soured of him because I know he’s an insider hack, not an outsider conservative.
27
posted on
03/01/2009 4:48:27 AM PST
by
Nextrush
(Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan.)
To: gthog61
The only way the RNC regains any credibility is if he is gone in the primary.
Toomey came close the last time around. Only thing that really saved Specter was Santorum riding in to the rescue. Specter repaid the favor by cutting and running when Santorum was up for reelection.
If Toomey runs again, and it's a two-person race, Specter loses the primary. I'm not from PA, but I really hope that the PA Conservatives get their act together and settle on a single candidate to challenge Specter for the nomination before the primary. Regardless of whether it's Toomey or not. Having two or three or four Conservatives and Specter in the primary probably (as the article points out) means a Specter win.
I'd also bet that if Specter loses his primary he does what Lieberman did in CT and runs in the general as an independent. In that case it'll be fun to watch the reaction of all the Nedheads who skewered Lieberman for doing that.
To: rabscuttle385
Ten years too late.
In fact, people like him should never be elected in the first place. The fact he has been elected over and over again shows how politicians are able to corrupt the election process by using pork to keep themselves in office.
29
posted on
03/01/2009 5:10:32 AM PST
by
Iron Munro
(Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
To: rabscuttle385
Good! Get rid of that Quisling.
30
posted on
03/01/2009 6:11:59 AM PST
by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: rabscuttle385
I expect we will hear Spector suddenly becoming a good Republican for the next year or so until the Primary.
31
posted on
03/01/2009 6:19:06 AM PST
by
bilhosty
(Welcome to Eat the Press)
To: river rat
Is there no such thing as a recall election ?
To: rabscuttle385
What is the illness of someone like specter that thinks they should stay in political office for life.
33
posted on
03/01/2009 7:29:59 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
To: rabscuttle385
He’ll be toast in 2010 if my vote has anything to do with it.
34
posted on
03/01/2009 7:54:21 AM PST
by
3catsanadog
(I plan to give the new President the same respect and dignity the other side gave Bush.)
To: bilhosty
I expect we will hear Spector suddenly becoming a good Republican for the next year or so until the Primary.I suspect he'll become a Democrat. In the '94 swing to the GOP lots of Dems switched. Spectre would be a prime candidate for the reverse. He'd be drawn to the Dem advantage in fundraising. And being a Dem would allow him to become the kind of "moderate" the media LOVES....a liberal moderate! Not to mention the advantage he would get by being on the "right side" of the Philly machine.
Yeah, I think he'll switch.
35
posted on
03/01/2009 8:02:23 AM PST
by
Timeout
(The Brits have their royal family. We have our privileged "public servant" class.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson