Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alan Keyes on Barack Obama: "He's a radical communist...He’s going to destroy this country"
America's Independent Party ^ | February 20, 2009 | Alan Keyes interviewed

Posted on 02/20/2009 11:45:38 AM PST by EternalVigilance

"Obama is a radical communist and I think it is becoming clear. That is what I told people in Illinois and now everybody realizes it is coming true. He is going to destroy this country and we are either going to stop him or the United States of America is going to cease to exist." - Alan Keyes

Video available at the link...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Front Page News; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: communismkills; fearlessleader; keyes; nakedcommunist; obama; obamunism; porky; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last
To: raisincane

Ok EXACTLY what are we going to do ? I’m not being sarcastic here. We HAVE to ALL organize . We need a leader and a group of people with serious organizational skills. This Tea Party idea sounds like a good first step by it HAS to be a HUGE HUGE event , I mean MILLIONS of people . I’ve already joined another site that is promoting the idea but no sure how far they have gone into planning it .
If we dont organize then this is all a moot point. Obama has FOUR YEARS left and look at the damage he’s already done in a month .Think about it. We MUST promote a nation wide protest that will get world wide attention.


201 posted on 02/21/2009 11:15:00 PM PST by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: okie01
If Alan Keyes is such a potent candidate for the Republican party, why hasn't he ever won a Republican primary? Why hasn't he ever come close?

That's not true.

Senate Republican Primary Election Results, Maryland, 1992:

 James H. Berry	        3%
 John J. Bishop	        4%
 Joseph I. Cassily	8%
 Joyce Friend-Nalepka	3%
 Herman J. Hannan	1%
 Stuart Hopkins	        2%
*Alan L. Keyes	        46%
 Martha S. Klima	10%
 William H Krehnbrink	1%
 Scott L. Meredith	2%
 Ross Z. Pierpont	6%
 Edward R. Shannon	2%
 S Rob Sobhani	        6%
 Romie A Sonqer	        3%
 Eugene R Zarwell	3%
Mr Keyes had 95,706 votes or 46 percent in the Republican contest with all 1,593 precincts reporting. His nearest challenger in the 15 candidate field was Baltimore County state Del. Martha Klima who received 20,075 votes or 10 percent.

I guess you'll find this pretty meaningful.
202 posted on 02/21/2009 11:16:00 PM PST by Gelato (... a liberal is a liberal is a liberal ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1

I agree with you, too, that Obama is far from unbeatable now by a real conservative who can win the war of ideas.


203 posted on 02/21/2009 11:17:27 PM PST by Gelato (... a liberal is a liberal is a liberal ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Gelato
[Keyes'] nearest challenger in the 15 candidate field was Baltimore County state Del. Martha Klima who received 20,075 votes or 10 percent.

I'm not sure I'd call waxing the likes Martha Klima and Eugene R. Zarwell "meaningful".

I'll grant Keyes won a primary -- which was indeed news to me. But does that really mean anything. Because nobody outside of family and neighbors ever heard of the other 14...

204 posted on 02/22/2009 7:28:53 AM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1
How does that bear on his debating prowess? What does that prove against his arguments?

You said Keyes destroyed him. A destroyed man does not go on to win.

205 posted on 02/22/2009 10:57:59 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1
It is you that supposes Obama's arguments to be superior. It is you that must prove them.

I never said that Obama's arguments were superior. You should be careful. Interesting. You come out with a stand, I challenge your stand, you distort my position and then demand that I prove that distorted position.

206 posted on 02/22/2009 11:00:42 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: All
To all Freepers that put down Keyes:

Keyes is standing up a speaking the truth with great passion. He might not win but he is standing tall for truth now. He needs your support, prayers, and thanks.

207 posted on 02/22/2009 11:02:48 AM PST by bmwcyle (The end is near and this time I mean it. Get right with JESUS NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
You said Keyes destroyed him. A destroyed man does not go on to win.

The destroyed man certainly can go in to win if in a state with a hopelessly liberal bias. Illinois is such a state. The debates had no effect upon the outcome, nor would one expect them to.

208 posted on 02/22/2009 2:02:05 PM PST by roamer_1 (Proud 1%er... Reagan Conservatism is the only way forward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
I never said that Obama's arguments were superior. You should be careful. Interesting. You come out with a stand, I challenge your stand, you distort my position and then demand that I prove that distorted position.

That is the point of debate. That is it's purpose by definition. To present opposing views in a reasonable fashion.

The intellectually superior argument is the winning argument.

Present Keyes vs. Obama to this nation instead of the hapless inhabitants of my home state and I would venture to say that your error would become immediately apparent.

209 posted on 02/22/2009 2:11:59 PM PST by roamer_1 (Proud 1%er... Reagan Conservatism is the only way forward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: okie01
But does that really mean anything.

You were the one who said it would.

Personally, all I care about is what the man says. He's right on the mark.

210 posted on 02/22/2009 4:27:13 PM PST by Gelato (... a liberal is a liberal is a liberal ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Gelato
But does that really mean anything?

You were the one who said it would.

Well, if a football team goes 1-10 on the season, but beats the crap out of the West Concordia School for the Deaf, Dumb and Blind, does it really mean anything?

211 posted on 02/22/2009 5:32:27 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Non sequitur.

The outcomes of elections depend on the people.


212 posted on 02/22/2009 9:03:41 PM PST by Gelato (... a liberal is a liberal is a liberal ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1

I love Keyes. I know why he ran in Illinois. I can’t blame
him for it one bit. But he kind of branded himself as a
professional campaigner. I can also appreciate why he left
the party. But like Ralph Nader. No matter how good his
intentions. A third party turns into a spoiler.

After this last election. We have found that we could have
used a couple of Keyes in Maine and one in Pennsylvania.


213 posted on 02/23/2009 5:19:03 AM PST by TomHarkinIsNotFromIowa (Just so you know, we're ashamed the President of the United States is from Kenya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
The clock is ticking, I agree.

Ditto that.......!

We shall see, what we shall see..........

214 posted on 02/23/2009 5:39:30 AM PST by Osage Orange (Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: TomHarkinIsNotFromIowa
But like Ralph Nader. No matter how good his intentions. A third party turns into a spoiler.

Ah, the old "Don't vote for the guy who walks the walk, vote for the poser because he's a Republican" trick.

I am sorry to be snide (not really, as snide is like a second nature), but that old saw just doesn't work any more. Do what is right, not what is expedient. Had we been doing so all the way along, we would be in a far different place today, with both houses full of Reaganites like Dr. Keyes.

215 posted on 02/23/2009 6:40:41 AM PST by roamer_1 (Proud 1%er... Reagan Conservatism is the only way forward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1

I did vote for Ambassador Keyes in 1999. I will vote for him again.
I know more RINO’s who are afraid of him right now than Democrats. Because he can fundamentally change their party.


216 posted on 02/23/2009 12:38:09 PM PST by TomHarkinIsNotFromIowa (Just so you know, we're ashamed the President of the United States is from Kenya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: TomHarkinIsNotFromIowa
I know more RINO’s who are afraid of him right now than Democrats. Because he can fundamentally change their party.

Dude. You're talking about a guy who couldn't get even 1% of the primary vote in Texas. That's Texas for crying out loud!

Never mind that he's renounced his membership in the Republican party altogether.

The level of self-delusion on this site has risen to new heights.

217 posted on 02/23/2009 5:15:34 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

Dude..I’m on your side.


218 posted on 02/24/2009 5:05:11 AM PST by TomHarkinIsNotFromIowa (Just so you know, we're ashamed the President of the United States is from Kenya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

RE “I’m thinking you don’t know much about the power of the media filter to distort everything.”(the previous reply to you)

Let’s look at his point : “It’s all the media’s fault. And they are not going away so I guess it’s hopeless. Let’s all boycott the elections. And, lets demand our elected Rs call Obama a communist in public and turn their backs on him to camera. What? That might make republicans more unpopular? Just blame the media.”

Seriously : the media is keeping Obama a float and we need to get the message out on what he is doing and how bad it is. But name calling like Keyes and certain freepesr want will just backfire.


219 posted on 02/24/2009 5:05:34 AM PST by sickoflibs (Keynesian Economics : "If you won't spend your money WE WILL!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Bump.

You can watch it on You Tube too.

ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DlTgrMCxPg


220 posted on 03/01/2009 3:06:17 PM PST by Barnacle (God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson