You aren’t answering the question. If you give vague answers or non-answers, you can’t complain when someone misinterprets what you say.
Please do not post to me again on this question. I gave a very specific position statement and I am tired of you misrepresenting me and reposting the inane question to me. If you want to discuss my response to that question, please repost my entire response with your requested discussion points.
But you never answered the question put to you. Responding with a statement about teaching religion in schools (post 191) is not an answer to the two questions.
It's not an inane question. It's very relevant because as a rule, evos tend to support only a complete ban on teaching or even addressing creation along with evolution in the public schools. And the lack of answer on the part of the evos, really tells anyone what the evos position really is; that is ban creation.
The opt out option is used for other courses where the parents object to the course content. It could be used here but I haven't found an evo yet who'd support a common sense, inexpensive solution to the issue of teaching creation in public schools.
The only option is they ever support is an outright ban. Not only do they not want their kids to hear about it, they don't want anyone else's kids to hear about creation either.
It's more than hypocritical that they would object so strongly to their kids hearing something they don't want them to hear, but are so willing to force other people's kids to hear what the other parents don't want them to hear. All in the name of science.....