But you never answered the question put to you. Responding with a statement about teaching religion in schools (post 191) is not an answer to the two questions.
It's not an inane question. It's very relevant because as a rule, evos tend to support only a complete ban on teaching or even addressing creation along with evolution in the public schools. And the lack of answer on the part of the evos, really tells anyone what the evos position really is; that is ban creation.
The opt out option is used for other courses where the parents object to the course content. It could be used here but I haven't found an evo yet who'd support a common sense, inexpensive solution to the issue of teaching creation in public schools.
The only option is they ever support is an outright ban. Not only do they not want their kids to hear about it, they don't want anyone else's kids to hear about creation either.
It's more than hypocritical that they would object so strongly to their kids hearing something they don't want them to hear, but are so willing to force other people's kids to hear what the other parents don't want them to hear. All in the name of science.....
It's more than hypocritical that they would object so strongly to their kids hearing something they don't want them to hear, but are so willing to force other people's kids to hear what the other parents don't want them to hear. All in the name of science.....
Exactly, and it's plain to see by now it has nothing at all to do with science.
And they go to no lengths whatsoever to dispel nonsense like algore's cult of manmade global warming, string theory or multiverse theory that I've seen.
It's all got everything to do with their sensibilities over God.
Period.