To: malkee
Has anyone asked Specter, “Why the rush to endorse this bill that is being passed as an emergency stimulus, but doesn’t really go into effect for two or more years?” The reality of this stimulus negates Specter’s whole justification for betraying his party.
8 posted on
02/12/2009 11:14:46 PM PST by
Nephi
(Like the failed promise of Fascism, masquerading as Capitalism? You're gonna love Marxism.)
To: Nephi
Specter actually said he had a problem with the way this bill is being rushed through. But so far that hasn’t stopped him from saying he’ll vote for it.
11 posted on
02/12/2009 11:20:17 PM PST by
malkee
(Actually I'm an ex-smoker--two and a half years-- But I think about it every day.)
To: Nephi
Has anyone asked Specter, “Why the rush to endorse this bill that is being passed as an emergency stimulus, but doesn’t really go into effect for two or more years?” Unfortunately, those who have had the opportunity in front of the camera have squandered it, from what I have seen. :-( Let's hope he gets on the hot seat soon!
24 posted on
02/12/2009 11:46:08 PM PST by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: Nephi
Has anyone asked Specter, “Why the rush to endorse this bill that is being passed as an emergency stimulus, but doesn’t really go into effect for two or more years?” The reality of this stimulus negates Specter’s whole justification for betraying his party.
Thats almost exactly what I asked when I was at his office. the handout we recieved said on the first sentence "I am voting for this for one reason....something has to be done."
I said thats it? Why do something thats wrong just to do it?!! Start over and write a good bill! This is no way to run a government!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson