All of Obama's Legal Cases

US Courts System ^ | 2/10/2009 | US Courts

[BP2]

338 Total Party matches for selection OBAMA, B
for ALL COURTS

Mon Feb 10 7:57:00 2009

Selections 1 through 54 (Page 1)

	Next 54

Civil Cases
	Name	Court	Case No.	Filed	NOS	Closed
1	OBAMA, B	ilcdce	3:2008cv03169	08/04/2008	440	08/15/2008
Armstead v. HSBC Card Services et al
2	OBAMA, B.	ilndce	1:2008cv04487	08/08/2008	550	09/23/2008
Luevano v. Obama et al
3	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2009cv00006	01/06/2009	441	01/27/2009
Roy v. Bush et al
4	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2009cv00041	01/29/2009	441
Roy v. Obama
5	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2008cv00362	08/11/2008	440	08/27/2008
Roy vs. USDC
6	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2008cv00424	09/22/2008	441	10/22/2008
Roy v. USA Govt et al
7	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2008cv00580	12/22/2008	441
Roy v. Obama et al
8	OBAMA, B.H.	hidce	1:2009cv00048	02/03/2009	440
Roy vs. Obama
9	OBAMA, B.H.	hidce	1:2008cv00448	10/08/2008	440	10/27/2008
Roy v. Federal Election Commission et al
10	OBAMA, BARACK	dedce	1:2009cv00014	12/29/2008	550
Gadson v. Obama et al
11	OBAMA, BARACK	nhdce	1:1997mc00024	12/04/1997	0	12/09/1997
WILSON MASTER FILE v. ALL DEFENDANTS, et al
12	OBAMA, BARACK	kyedce	3:2008cv00028	06/10/2008	530	07/11/2008
Becker v. Mukasey et al
13	OBAMA, BARACK	tnmdce	3:2008mc00036	02/01/2008		02/05/2008
Ervin v. Bush et al
14	OBAMA, BARACK	ilndce	1:2007cv00053	01/16/2007	550	01/16/2007
Awala v. Norgle et al
15	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2009cv00079	01/14/2009	550	01/14/2009
HYLAND v. OBAMA et al
16	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00088	01/14/2005	550	11/25/2005
RIVERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
17	OBAMA, BARACK	candce	3:2007cv00109	01/09/2007	440
Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. et al v. Bush et al
18	OBAMA, BARACK	nddce	3:2008cv00126	12/16/2008	330
Gleeson v. McDonald
19	OBAMA, BARACK	tnmdce	3:2008cv00146	02/12/2008	440	02/12/2008
Ervin v. Bush et al
20	OBAMA, BARACK	txwdce	5:2008cv00159	02/28/2008	440	03/18/2008
Smith v. University of Texas At Austin et al
21	OBAMA, BARACK	nhdce	1:2008cv00185	05/09/2008	530	06/10/2008
Becker v. Blightler et al
22	OBAMA, BARACK	flndce	1:2007cv00187	09/28/2007	440	10/06/2008
MORRIS v. BUSH et al
23	OBAMA, BARACK	caedce	1:2006cv00195	02/22/2006	530	04/10/2006
(HC) Thomas v. Federal Congress et al
24	OBAMA, BARACK	flndce	1:2008cv00208	09/26/2008	440	12/12/2008
MORRIS v. LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO et al
25	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00270	02/04/2005	530	04/09/2007
EL-MASHAD et al v. BUSH et al
26	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2008cv00284	03/20/2008	441
Bloom et al v. The Democratic National Committe et al
27	OBAMA, BARACK	mndce	0:2008cv00360	02/11/2008	440	03/19/2008
Sinclair v. Obama et al
28	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00492	03/10/2005	530	04/09/2007
AZIZ et al v. BUSH et al
29	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00569	03/18/2005	530	04/09/2007
SALAHI et al v. BUSH et al
30	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00748	04/11/2005	530	05/30/2007
ABOASSY et al v. BUSH et al
31	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00765	04/15/2005	530
HABASHI et al v. BUSH et al
32	OBAMA, BARACK	ilndce	1:1996cv00823	02/13/1996	440	03/04/1996
Ewell v. Bd of Elect Comm, et al
33	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00877	05/03/2005	530	04/09/2007
KHIALI-GUL v. BUSH et al
34	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	8:2008cv00948	03/20/2008	441	05/28/2008
Bloom et al v. The Democratic National Committe et al
35	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2007cv00964	10/11/2007	440	11/26/2007
Herbert v. United States of America et al
36	OBAMA, BARACK	paedce	2:2006cv01055	03/09/2006	550	07/26/2006
RICHES v. BUSH et al
37	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01124	06/07/2005	530	05/30/2007
MOUSOVI et al v. BUSH et al
38	OBAMA, BARACK	miwdce	1:2008cv01154	12/08/2008	440	01/06/2009
Hyland #228879 v. Levin et al
39	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2008cv01164	12/04/2008	440
Herbert v. Obama et al
40	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01189	06/14/2005	530	04/09/2007
KHALIFH et al v. BUSH et al
41	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2008cv01201	12/15/2008	440	01/21/2009
Herbert v. United States of America et al
42	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01224	07/17/2008	530
GUL v. BUSH et al
43	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01228	07/17/2008	530
HADI v. BUSH et al
44	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01232	07/17/2008	530
BIN ATEF v. BUSH et al
45	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01237	07/17/2008	530
AL WADY v. BUSH et al
46	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01353	07/05/2005	530	05/09/2007
SAIB et al v. BUSH et al
47	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01430	08/18/2008	550	09/11/2008
THORNTON-BEY v. OBAMA
48	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01487	06/13/2008	530
SADKHAN v. BUSH et al
49	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01497	07/29/2005	530
AL WIRGHI et al v. BUSH et al
50	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01506	07/28/2005	530	05/15/2007
SHAFIIQ et al v. BUSH et al
51	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01592	08/09/2005	530
ATTASH et al v. BUSH et al
52	OBAMA, BARACK	moedce	4:2008cv01757	11/12/2008	550	01/08/2009
Towne v. Obama
53	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2006cv01758	07/31/2008	530
SULIMAN et al v. BUSH et al
54	OBAMA, BARACK	candce	M:2006cv01791	08/14/2006	440
In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation

Next 54 ALL of Obama, Soetoro Court Cases on Scribd

[DMZFrank]

Their former British citizenship raised the possibility of divided allegiance. The grandfather clause ended that question constitutionally.

[DMZFrank]

“The reason they weren’t “natural born citizens” is because the United States didn’t exist when they were born. Their British citizenship had nothing to do with it.”

Exactly. Which is why they could not possibly satisfy the NBC requirement without the grandfather clause.

[Uncle Chip]

Obviously, my view on the NBC Question does not matter.

Sure it does. It matters to your character and integrity in light of your defense of Obama. Odds are that you have no doubts whatsoever that Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, Nixon ... Bush were all natural born citizens. But by your answer you are indicating that you do have doubts that Obama is a natural born citizen. Would that be an accurate assessment????

What does matter is that each of the 538 members if the Electoral College, the 535 members of Congress, the 50 governors, the nine members of the SCOTUS and the Vice President believe that Obama is qualified to be President.

No -- They have simply chosen a path of least resistance. They did not deal with the question of whether he met the natural born qualification for office, just who got the most votes. In their minds majority rule trumped the Constitution -- the mark of a socialist mindset.

[mlo]

"Exactly. Which is why they could not possibly satisfy the NBC requirement without the grandfather clause."

Do you realize you just contradicted your own post in #341?

The grandfather clause was NOT because they were British citizens.

The grandfather clause was because the United States didn't exist when any of them were born.

[x]

The "preponderance of evidence" regarding Obama's Natural Born Citizen status at this point is overwhelming... Affidavit of Reverend Kweli Shuhubia Affidavit of Bishop Ron McRae The ONE eye witness: Obama's Grandmother audio - Barack Born in Kenya and there's lots more...

What got this all started was Sarah Obama saying that her husband's grandson was a "son of the village" which McRae took to mean that he was born in the village.

Then you had that confused phone call, where McRae was trying to get her to say Barack Obama was born in Mombasa. And in his affadavit, McRae says he's heard evidence that Obama was born in Mombasa.

But Mombasa's on the other side of the country from the village where the Obamas lived. It's on the Indian Ocean in the East and they live not far from Lake Victoria on the Western edge of the country.

There are hundreds of miles in between. It would have been quite a trip for the Kenyan patriarch and his wives.

And if BHO was born in Mombasa, he wasn't a "son of the village" in the sense that McRae claimed he was. The fishing expedition and the original reason for it don't add up.

So I conclude that "Anabaptist Bishop" McRae is either very confused, or misled by others, or pulling a scam.

[mlo]

And on the recording of the call to “granny” they repeatedly correct the interviewer telling him that Obama was “born in America” and “born in Hawaii”.

[seekthetruth]

“Anyone know if Eric S can get other TN reps to sign on with Orly?”

They are talking about it now on Plains. Believe there are three more Representatives that are going to sign on with Orley. :)

http://www.plainsradio.com/

[Jim Noble]

No legit POTUS would do this when the remedy for a legit POTUS is so easy to accomplish unless he was the sort of lying cryto-marxist Alinskyite bastid who believes that the constitution is “fundamentally flawed"

The problem with your reasoning is that "Obama" IS a lying cryto-marxist Alinskyite bastid who believes that the constitution is “fundamentally flawed".

[Jim Noble]

It is precisely like submitting proof of a job requirement when you seek to be hired.

Except that most employers require such a submission, but the Federal electoral process does not.

[DMZFrank]

“The problem with your reasoning is that “Obama” IS a lying cryto-marxist Alinskyite bastid who believes that the constitution is “fundamentally flawed”.

I meant to say CRYPTO-Marxist. Otherwise we have no argument about that. I have never seen worse than this man in my lifetime.

[DMZFrank]

The statutory vetting process is admiittedly murky and needs to be reformed IMMEDIATELY. If SCOTUS takes the case, they might even rule that he is not an NBC, but the statutory regulations in support of the clause does not exist, and the remedy lies else where. I think it is Congress’s responsibility to remedy this, but that too is unlikely given that it is a RAT’s nest now.

But since the requirement is there in article II, Sec. I, clause 5 of the constitution and that is the supreme law of the land, I believe that something should be done to address it. We most definitely need a legal precedent in this manner and a statutory method to regulate it.

[BP2]

If these agencies (and there are other examples if you take the time to do your homework) think the "Certification of Live Birth" does not rise to their level of "evidence" required to prove birth, why are YOU so willingly eager to accept it?

Applying for Hawaiian Home Lands - Primary Documents

NAVSHIPYD Pearl Harbor - Unified Facilities Guide Specifications, section 1.5.22.2

LOL. I hope you didn't fall hook, line and sinker for this whopper, too:

"I want to say one thing to the American people.
I want you to listen to me. I did not have sexual relations
with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to
lie, not a single time..."

[mlo]

"If these agencies (and there are other examples if you take the time to do your homework) think the "Certification of Live Birth" does not rise to their level of "evidence" required to prove birth, why are YOU so willingly eager to accept it?"

It's appropriate that you include a photo of the perjurer, because you are promoting a falsehood in your post.

These agencies DO accept the Certificate of Live Birth as proof of birth. Nothing on that page says otherwise.

What the Hawaiian Home Lands page says is that to qualify for that program you also have to prove *ancestry*. Not just your own Hawaiian birth. You are misrepresenting what they say.

On the other item, under "Documents Acceptable for Proof of Citizenship", right there at item "b." it says, "Certificate of live birth, birth certificate". The COLB is a birth certificate.

Stop misrepresenting the facts.

[TigersEye]

For most of these people “0bama says so” is all they need.

[TigersEye]

These agencies DO accept the Certificate of Live Birth as proof of birth. Nothing on that page says otherwise.

You're misrepresenting what the document says. Re read it.

[x]

And on the recording of the call to “granny” they repeatedly correct the interviewer telling him that Obama was “born in America” and “born in Hawaii”.

That's true. But there was so much confusion on the clip, that I couldn't figure out what was going on.

McRae's contention is that the family was trying to shut Sarah Obama up. I'd have to listen to the clip a dozen times more before I could make up my mind on that. Probably not even then, since you'd have to understand the language they were speaking.

It does remind me a bit of the Detroit shock jocks who talked to a Kenyan diplomat on the air, though. They had him "admitting" that Obama was born in Kenya before he even figured out just what they were getting at.

But it is pretty clear to me that the Mombasa story didn't originate with "granny." It even contradicts what McRae said about the earlier BBC interview with her.

[mlo]

"You're misrepresenting what the document says. Re read it."

No, I am not. It requires proof of your ancestry, not just proof of your own Hawaiian birth. It doesn't even reject the COLB, it just says sending the other one will save you time and money.

The COLB is proof of Hawaiian birth. Nothing on that page says otherwise. They just have ancestry requirements for THAT program and need more.

If someone says that page shows that they reject the COLB as proof of Hawaiian birth they are wrong.

[TigersEye]

You're lying. It says you have to have a "Certificate of Live Birth because a Certification of Live Birth requires further verification." You dishonestly changed 'Certification' with 'Certificate.'

[mlo]

I am not lying, and I don't appreciate you accusing me. Swapping "certification" and "certificate" doesn't change the meaning.

The birther claim is that page rejects the "Certification of Live Birth" as proof of Hawaiian birth. I'm saying that is a false claim.

That page says nothing about the COLB not being proof of Hawaiian birth. That isn't the point of it. The point is that this particular program requires proof of Hawaiian *ancestry*. Proving your own birth is not enough.

[TigersEye]

If proof of birth isn't the point of it why does it say "This is a more complete record of your birth...?"