[Wil H]

—despite the countervailing evidence of a certified birth certificate, a birth announcement in the local newspaper..

You are correct in your assertions, but neither item are in any way proof of a natural born citizen.

In 1961 a foreign born child of a Hawaii resident could be registered in Hawaii - Therefore they would have a valid Hawaiian Birth Certificate but NOT necessarily be a "natural born citizen", and in 0bama's case he would not be given his mother's age and father's nationality.

The newspaper announcement is merely a result of his birth being registered in Hawaii (all registrations were reported in the paper) and shed no further light on his eligibility, it merely confirms his birth was registered, but, as already stated, that didn't validate his eligibility.

So your "Evidence" is meaningless, and the preponderance of evidence is that 0bama is going to extraordinary lengths, and cost, to conceal the details of his birth certificate.

Perhaps you should address that...

[HawaiianGecko]

"In 1961 a foreign born child of a Hawaii resident could be registered in Hawaii"   You are correct in your assertion, but it is in no way proof of a non-natural born citizen.

The newspaper announcement is merely a result of his birth being registered in Hawaii (all registrations were reported in the paper) and shed no further light on his eligibility, it merely confirms his birth was registered, but, as already stated, that didn't validate his eligibility.  You are correct in your assertion, but it is in no way proof of a non-natural born citizen.

In 1961 a foreign born child of a Hawaii resident could be registered in Hawaii - Therefore they would have a valid Hawaiian Birth Certificate but NOT necessarily be a "natural born citizen", and in 0bama's case he would not be given his mother's age and father's nationality. You are correct in your assertion, but it is in no way proof of a non-natural born citizen.

He could have been born on the Dark Side of the Moon during the Apollo moon shot, but my assertion is in no way proof that it happened, only possible.

So your "Evidence" is meaningless.

[mlo]

"In 1961 a foreign born child of a Hawaii resident could be registered in Hawaii - Therefore they would have a valid Hawaiian Birth Certificate but NOT necessarily be a "natural born citizen"..."

Hawaiian citizens, and citizens of other states, have a legitimate need to register the births of children born outside the country. This ability does not mean that the birth certificate will LIE. The place of birth is the place of birth. Obama's says he was born in Honolulu.

[mlo]

"In 1961 a foreign born child of a Hawaii resident could be registered in Hawaii..."

I forgot to mention, the law people cite supporting this was passed in 1982.