[HawaiianGecko]

"In 1961 a foreign born child of a Hawaii resident could be registered in Hawaii"   You are correct in your assertion, but it is in no way proof of a non-natural born citizen.

The newspaper announcement is merely a result of his birth being registered in Hawaii (all registrations were reported in the paper) and shed no further light on his eligibility, it merely confirms his birth was registered, but, as already stated, that didn't validate his eligibility.  You are correct in your assertion, but it is in no way proof of a non-natural born citizen.

In 1961 a foreign born child of a Hawaii resident could be registered in Hawaii - Therefore they would have a valid Hawaiian Birth Certificate but NOT necessarily be a "natural born citizen", and in 0bama's case he would not be given his mother's age and father's nationality. You are correct in your assertion, but it is in no way proof of a non-natural born citizen.

He could have been born on the Dark Side of the Moon during the Apollo moon shot, but my assertion is in no way proof that it happened, only possible.

So your "Evidence" is meaningless.

[Wil H]

I don’t understand your posting.

I am not arguing that he is definitely a “non-natural born citizen”, I am arguing that he has produced no evidence whatsoever that he IS a “natural born citizen”.

The evidence cited which you implied validated his claim as a natural born citizen is useless for the reasons I explained. The only known evidence that could settle the question is being concealed by 0bama at great cost to him.

Until he releases his original birth certificate with the details of the birth location and the signature of the attending physician (as McCain did when challenged), then I shall continue to believe he is hiding something.

That was my point.