To: nickcarraway
It’s not “We the People’s” government anymore. The government has taken over and it’s our fault for letting them do it.
2 posted on
02/03/2009 11:16:36 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(I wish it was 20 January 2013. I've had enough of this crap already.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
The lesbians in Tennessee are all over this one.
To: FlingWingFlyer
How can they find an amendment of the calif. constitution unconstitutional?
To: FlingWingFlyer
I really don’t think the radical left in this country understands that they can push things, but only so far...and then it will break.
So lets see a court can mandate sweeping changes, but millions of voters can’t....in AN AMENDMENT???
God help us all.
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”
—Thomas Jefferson
To: FlingWingFlyer
Just because "we the people" want something does not mean it's legal. The constitution must be followed.
What if 'we the people' decide that free speech should be banned? Or the right to petition? Or, in this case, want to scrub the equal protection provision?
"We the people" are ignorant of the constitution. Just look at the last election.
17 posted on
02/03/2009 11:34:57 PM PST by
ex91B10
(So many opinions, so little time...)
To: FlingWingFlyer
It’s not “We the People’s” government anymore. The government has taken over and it’s our fault for letting them do it.
Actually, a few men in black robes have taken over and are dictating their particular agenda to the rest of us.
What "the People" want is irrelevant. The only thing that counts is what these liberal judges want.
46 posted on
02/04/2009 7:46:21 AM PST by
Deo volente
(High Noon, January 20, 2009: Our long national nightmare begins.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson