Skip to comments.
Steele: GOP Should Reach Out To Gay, Pro-Choice Voters
Video Cafe (via Fox News) ^
| Feburary 1, 2009
| David Sunday
Posted on 02/02/2009 9:17:17 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500, 501-520, 521-540 ... 621-634 next last
To: LibLieSlayer
Wonder if any of the FR RINOS actually clicked on the link and read the comments section under that article?
I Did! and the lib-rats are voicing their opinions, they should go read what they say when they're “reached out” to.
RINOs like Steel should read them as well....
501
posted on
02/02/2009 5:54:59 PM PST
by
DirtyHarryY2K
("yes we can" Not at my expense!)
To: manc
They have infiltrated schools, Churchs and now I hope not this site They have been here for a long time disguising themselves as Libertarians.
502
posted on
02/02/2009 5:55:14 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
To: Troll_House_Cookies
Or I may have read it and decided it was trivial and ignored it. Zooom! Just like I thought.
503
posted on
02/02/2009 6:00:58 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
To: Lexinom
I still couldn’t get it to work for me. I don’t have the latest version of Adobe flash player. I’m willing to give him a chance based on what I’ve heard and read to this point. He seems to understand and accept the Republica platform of pro-life and pro-heterosexual marriage. He also comes across as quite pro-life personally....not so sure about his views on gay marriage.
The point is ... his job is to raise money and get Republicans elected, not get himself elected as a congressman. He seems to have a talent in the communication department and a forward looking approach on the organizational methods (internet, grass roots, higher dependance on state campaign organizations) needed to get people elected. If he applies those skills to getting Conservatives elected, that’s a plus for the Republican party. If he waters down the more conservative aspects of the Republican party, that’s not helpful. I will wait and see.
504
posted on
02/02/2009 6:01:55 PM PST
by
Girlene
(Hey, Repub's: This is an entrepreneurial insurgency)
To: donna
If we stand together and live up to these principles, we will not fail Thanks Donna, so many self proclaimed Reaganites don't seem to remember a thing he stood for.
505
posted on
02/02/2009 6:05:30 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
To: Lexinom
I have always found it best to not assume to speak for someone. The cynic in me has seen the real stuff behind the R party and how they treat their conservative candidates, set them up for failure they instigate themselves. The RNC was corrupt before Michael. The only difference is now they are just plain coming out and saying it blatantly, not hiding it behind excuses, masks and mock phrases. You buy into your perception of Michael's words, as you wish.
If you want to welcome more people into your party who do not hold to the party planks, you can join the RINOs that are left there. The planks are what the party is supposed to be standing for. Invite someone in who doesn't agree with all the planks, but some of them, then run them for a candidate and... WAH- LAH! You have the RINO party that exists!! Compromise away your party planks to increase your voter base and have a party that doesn't stand for what it claims to stand for.
Doesn't bother me any, if that is what you wish to do with your party. It is no longer my party. I left it when the Republican Party refused to even acknowledge Alan Keyes as a candidate, ~ mock primary and all. Keep your party and continue to compromise your planks and principles until no one can tell the difference between the Democrats and the Republicans.
506
posted on
02/02/2009 6:30:20 PM PST
by
MountainFlower
(There but by the grace of God go I.)
To: itsahoot; Girlene
C'mon. You asked for something recent - Girlene delivered (post 246) - be a gentleman and tell her that you are wrong.
Unless you're a female, then I expect the utmost ladylike conduct.
Regardless, admit your error o'judgement.
507
posted on
02/02/2009 6:31:17 PM PST
by
jla
(Sarah! sarahpac.com)
Comment #508 Removed by Moderator
To: Ol' Sparky
Are you positively insane? Do you know how bad it would look for the Republican party to force their first black Chairman to resign within days of being elected? It would be a public relations disaster. It would be like making a big neon sign saying, “!!!Minorities Are Not Welcome!!!” The party would never recover. Some here seem intent on having the GOP fail.
509
posted on
02/02/2009 6:57:51 PM PST
by
gtsamson
(The GOP has no place for extremism.)
To: UCFRoadWarrior
510
posted on
02/02/2009 6:59:05 PM PST
by
Radix
(There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those with loaded guns & those who dig. You dig.)
To: UCFRoadWarrior
Michael Steele, the new chairman of the Republican National Committee wants the GOP to reach out to candidates who support gay marriage and are pro-choice. Steele told Fox's Chris Wallace that it was "important" to reach out to those voters. The only reach out I want is tell these people that they are wrong in the eyes of God and to pray that they see the error of their ways.
511
posted on
02/02/2009 7:11:40 PM PST
by
DejaJude
(Proud denizen of the fighting fringe and an Arizona zealot.)
To: gtsamson; Ol' Sparky
Are you positively insane? Do you know how bad it would look for the Republican party to force their first black Chairman to resign within days of being elected? It would be a public relations disaster. It would be like making a big neon sign saying, !!!Minorities Are Not Welcome!!! The party would never recover. Some here seem intent on having the GOP fail.So what your are saying is that Michael Steele is an Affirmative Action GOP Chairman. He's the GOP's Token Black Man.
Great. WE can't fire him even though he's an incompentent buffoon because he's black.
Great.
Political correctness gone mad.
512
posted on
02/02/2009 7:14:28 PM PST
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: MountainFlower
I remember when Keyes ran against zero for the US senate, The FR rinos would attack anyone that support Keyes here on FR.
Why it was allowed is a mystery to me.
Like you I am done with the RINO party. Let them see if they can replace the base with moderates and perverts/abortionists.
513
posted on
02/02/2009 7:18:13 PM PST
by
DirtyHarryY2K
(To hell with the RINO party!)
To: itsahoot
M’kay. You’ll have to explain why you felt compelled to send me this one. Don’t quite see the connection you’re trying to make. Thanks in advance.
514
posted on
02/02/2009 7:44:21 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Pro-Life Capitalist American Atheist and Free-Speech Junkie)
To: donna
Because it's like kissing Jane Fonda on the lips! Baby killing is a line that cannot be crossed. Homosexuality is a line that cannot be crossed. This is because both issues make mush of our American culture. OK, I'm just gonna give up on this thread, since no one seems to actually read what I've written before they send their intentional misrepresentations.
I have this silly idea that we should be trying to convert more people to conservatism. Silly me! We should just stick with the same number of voters we had last time!
That'll consistently give us more lib presidents, and a lib congress and SCOTUS forever.
More abortions, more gay marriage, more watering-down of the WOT...
Some "conservatives" apparently have a suicide wish.
515
posted on
02/02/2009 7:47:05 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Pro-Life Capitalist American Atheist and Free-Speech Junkie)
Comment #516 Removed by Moderator
To: Always Right
Nothing wrong with reaching out and trying to find common ground on other issues.I completely agree. It's not like the GOP would be reaching out to gay voters to we can all agree to be gay.
To: Morgana
i'd rather lose...
518
posted on
02/02/2009 8:03:03 PM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist -)
To: Darkwolf377
I have this silly idea that we should be trying to convert more people to conservatism. No. You are here trying to convert conservatives into RINOs.
519
posted on
02/02/2009 8:23:01 PM PST
by
donna
(Synonyms: Feminism, Marxism, Communism, Socialism, Fascism)
To: Retired Greyhound; manc
Reaching out to at the most .02% of the population, most of whom will never vote Republican no matter what, is insanity. If Steele means “reaching out” to anyone who is pro-homosexual marriage, then why the hell is he in the Republican party?
What Republicans should do is focus on conservative values and positions and let the chips fall where they may. Many people who vote third party, don’t vote at all, or think all politicians are slime might be encouraged and vote Republican.
The problem with the GOP is not that it’s not “inclusive” enough (what a nauseating word), it’s that it’s too shallow, pandering, and moderate, IOW too liberal.
520
posted on
02/02/2009 8:41:19 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500, 501-520, 521-540 ... 621-634 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson