Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congratulations Michael Steele on your RNC appointment!
1-30-09 | Me

Posted on 01/30/2009 1:07:19 PM PST by utahson

Kudos to you Michael. Now stand tall and proud. Be strong and push conservative principles. Do not falter and do not shrink from the fight against Obama and the Democrats.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; antidoteforobama; catholic; michaelsteele; prolife; rino; rinos; rnc; rncchairman; steele
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 561-580 next last
To: Norman Bates

Oh, for example, the person who posted just before you.


361 posted on 01/30/2009 3:16:37 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Neanderthals for Life and Liberty - ) (AIPNEWS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: utahson

Great! He is a good conservative man!


362 posted on 01/30/2009 3:17:22 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Is the person you’re replying to even a member of the GOP?

If not, why does this appointment concern him so?

;^)


363 posted on 01/30/2009 3:18:26 PM PST by Constitution Day (Big Brotha Is Watching You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: utahson
Good News!


364 posted on 01/30/2009 3:19:32 PM PST by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak; utahson

I’m thinking Michelle Malkin has the right idea at her site and HotAir where they open up a short window from time-to-time to register new people, but mostly it is closed registration. Knowing Obama has his blackberry hit list of 13 million trolls gives me more than a little concern.


365 posted on 01/30/2009 3:20:41 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: utahson
Hip, hooray for our new MAN OF STEELE
His election today made me squeal
He'll fight for the Truth and for Justice
He will listen to us and will trust us
And he'll Kryptonize Barack's New Deal

WHOO HOO!

Leni

366 posted on 01/30/2009 3:21:42 PM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

I really don’t think who is chairman will make a bit of difference. The RNC is disconnected from the rank-and-file.


367 posted on 01/30/2009 3:24:59 PM PST by Theodore R. (GWB is gone: Now the American sheeple can sleep at night!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Let his blueprint speak for itself.
368 posted on 01/30/2009 3:25:42 PM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: utahson

This guy is is “nails.” He has been put through the “fire” and he really will be tremendous in front of a fawning Obama media that will try to throw fiery arrows his way.

WE WILL OVERCOME!


369 posted on 01/30/2009 3:28:00 PM PST by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
We laughed at democrats for electing someone based mainly on his speaking ability...sigh

In case seeing Paul Begalia on CNN say this was "a great pick" was not enough, here are some of Steele's own words from his speech today:

"We're gonna bring this party to every corner, every boardroom, every neighborhood, every community and we're gonna say to friend and foe alike: We want you to be a part of this, we want you to worth with us, and for those of you who wish to obstruct, get ready to get knocked over.

So I wonder how Steele feels about the entire GOP in the house voting to obstruct Obama's "stimulus" bill?

I wonder which of the groups currently against "us" he will be reaching out to more- The extremely leftist NAACP and Log Cabin Republicans? (both of which he praises in interviews) He said, in a discussion of California's Prop 8 on WBAL radio in Baltimore, that he wanted the GOP to stop being just against things and try to be more "inclusive". People speak about "code words" in politics all the time. Sadly it appears many are missing the ones Steele uses.

More from his speech:

"To my friends in the Northeast: get ready, baby. It's time to turn it on, and work to do what we always do well, and that is win."

Ah yes, those wonderful "northeast" Republican friends of his like Christie Todd Whitman. Just what our party needs more of.

BTW-I see some are already resorting to calling anyone who questions the selection of Steele a "wingnut". Nice to see DU terminology being used on FR.

Steele's support of the rino Wayne Gilcrest in Marylands 1st congressional district against the conservative Andrew Harris is something many need to learn about. Our former Republican governor (who Steele was Lt. Gov to) Bob Ehrlich, supported Harris as did almost every Republican state senator in Maryland. Gilcrest, who Steele supported, lost in the primary to the conservative Harris and then when the general election came the rino Gilcrest threw his support behind the Democrat. (D)Kratovil got just enough support from this move to pull ahead in an extremely close race. Thanks Mike...

“We have to elect moderates in the party,” he told CBN’s David Brody.

For more see: The case Aginst Mike Steele

Some may be buying into the idea that McCain lost because he was too "conservative". Tonight, they and the Christine Todd Whitmans of the world are very happy. But hey, don't trust a wingnut, look into Steele's record for yourself. Do what you told others to do about Obama and look past the slick interviews and speeches and look at his record.

370 posted on 01/30/2009 3:29:03 PM PST by icwhatudo (Still a proud member of the VRWC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

He’s moderate but unlike others here that couldn’t compromise and cost us an election, I am satisfied with that


371 posted on 01/30/2009 3:32:31 PM PST by RDTF (BO smells and eventually people do what's necessary to avoid it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

good riddance to Duncan. I was tired of tossing his mail in the trash.


372 posted on 01/30/2009 3:33:11 PM PST by omega4179 (1.20.13 end of an error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Wow...simply amazing. “We have to draw the line...on constitutionality” while not entirely banning the shotguns that skeet shooters own.

He’s lost my support entirely, and I’m sure the probable support of many millions of gun owners in America who believe the 2nd Amendment gives them the right to own semi-auto weapons, not just “shotguns used by skeet shooters.”

Yuck.

Ed


373 posted on 01/30/2009 3:33:49 PM PST by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; Constitution Day

I bet you Alan Keyes is thrilled about Steele winning the chairmanship!


374 posted on 01/30/2009 3:34:36 PM PST by Norman Bates (Congratulations Chairman Michael Steele!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Yuck.


375 posted on 01/30/2009 3:35:34 PM PST by omega4179 (1.20.13 end of an error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
...we're gonna say to friend and foe alike: We want you to be a part of this... - Michael Steele

Did he REALLY say that? Sheesh...

376 posted on 01/30/2009 3:35:47 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Neanderthals for Life and Liberty - ) (AIPNEWS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Well, he lost me on guns: he wants to ban them if they’re not shotguns, and now it turns out he wants to keep Roe v Wade.

Those are my two hot-button issues...he 2nd Amendment and Life.

I won’t donate any money to the GOP or volunteer for them as long as he runs it.

Ed


377 posted on 01/30/2009 3:36:27 PM PST by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
Dear Norman Bates,

No, I'm not happy with the election of Mr. Steele.

In his 2006 Senatorial campaign, Mr. Steele said this on Meet the Press:

Meet The Press on October 29, 2006.

MR. RUSSERT: ...Mr. Steele, if you’re United States Senator, would you vote for a constitutional amendment to outlaw abortion?

LT. GOV. STEELE: I don’t — vote for a constitutional amendment to outlaw abortion? I think we’d have to have that get to the Supreme Court, wouldn’t we? I haven’t seen that bill proposed. I don’t think...

MR. RUSSERT: That’s been introduced in the Senate.

LT. GOV. STEELE: I don’t think anyone’s going to propose that this day.

MR. RUSSERT: So you wouldn’t do that?

LT. GOV. STEELE: No.

MR. RUSSERT: Would, would you encourage — would you hope the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe vs. Wade?

LT. GOV. STEELE: I think that that’s a matter that’s going to rightly belong to the courts [emphasis added] to decide ultimately whether or not that, that issue should be addressed. The, the Court has taken a position, which I agree, stare decisis, which means that the law is as it is and, and so this is a matter that’s ultimately going to be adjudicated at the states. We’re seeing that. The states are beginning to decide for themselves on, on this and a host of other issues. And the Supreme Court would ultimately decide that.

MR. RUSSERT: But you hope that the Court keeps Roe v. Wade in place?

LT. GOV. STEELE: I think the Court will evaluate the law as society progresses, as the Court is supposed to do.

MR. RUSSERT: But what’s your position? Do you want them to sustain it or overturn it?

LT. GOV. STEELE: Well, I think, I think, I think Roe vs. Wade, Roe vs. Wade is a, is a matter that should’ve been left to the states to decide, ultimately. But it, it is where it is today, and the courts will ultimately decide whether or not this, this gets addressed by the states, goes back to the states in some form or they overturn it outright.

MR. RUSSERT: Is is your desire to keep it in place?

LT. GOV. STEELE: My desire is that we follow what stare decisis is at this point, yes.


I'm willing to say that this is a muddled attempt at straddling the fence. I'm willing to say that he was trimming his sails against a Democrat opponent in an overwhelmingly Democrat state. I'm even willing to give him a mulligan, and if he “clarifies” his position back to a more uniformly pro-life position, I'm willing to forget it.

But what he said isn't pro-life.

And unless he appropriately clarifies, I can't support him, and will likely quit the Republican Party.


sitetest

378 posted on 01/30/2009 3:36:34 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out

“they only see the skin color. that’s leftists for you. “

No, that’s Racists for you.


379 posted on 01/30/2009 3:36:47 PM PST by Danae (Amerikan Unity My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

How about this? Why don’t you give Steele 30 days? Watch what he says on the TV shows and in the emails? I bet if you changed the name you’d be happy with the message. Surely you can give him 30 days with elections over 1-1/2 years out.


380 posted on 01/30/2009 3:37:47 PM PST by Norman Bates (Congratulations Chairman Michael Steele!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 561-580 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson