\ Welcome to New Kenya (Africa U.S.A.)
"Where the law of the jungle has replaced the Law of the Land"
Can the SCOTUS not see the Results of this?
If the Constitution is dead, so is our nation!
Posted on 01/22/2009 7:56:16 PM PST by FreeAtlanta
SCOTUS message to the American people
January 20, 2009
On Wednesday, January 14, 2009, at the invitation of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, Also Known As Obama (hereafter known as AKA) and his sidekick, Joseph Biden, paid a visit to the United States Supreme Court, spending the better part of an hour sequestered in secrecy with eight of the nine United States Supreme Court Justices. Justice Alito was not in attendance.
According to an Associated Press release, written by Mark Sherman,
"When employees glimpsed Obama on his way out, a loud cheer went up in a building that exudes decorum."
Can one surmise the Supreme Court ecstatic over the illegitimate ...
The invitation of Chief Justice Roberts, the behind closed door meeting with a man who is the subject of lawsuits coming before the Supreme Court concerning his eligibility to the office of president, was not only inappropriate but leaves questionable the judicial conduct of the justices with whom AKA and Biden met.
Judges are to refrain from appearances of impropriety and partiality; from engaging in activities that compromise the mandate of an independent judiciary. According to the AP piece,
"Eight years ago, President George W. Bush did not visit the court before he took office, but the circumstances were — to put it mildly — unusual.
In December 2000, the court decided the case of Bush v. Gore by a 5-4 vote, ending the legal battle over the contested Florida election and effectively sealing the presidency for Bush."
The circumstances surrounding AKA are just as "unusual", considering the question of eligibility because of his refusal to produce the one document that would prove (or disprove) his eligibility to the office of president — his long form vault copy Hawaii birth certificate — a document that ....
(Excerpt) Read more at learn-usa.com ...
ping
She makes very good points about the fraternizing of the SCOTUS and POTUS.
Because of appearances of impropriety, all nine justices will recuse themelves from this case.
-PJ
The Supreme Court has become Obama’s and the left’s whipping boys and girl. Sad.
Actually, I believe the critical part of the case on the 2000 election was 7 to 2 or 6-3.
This is what ethics is all about. Just the appearance of Obama and the Justices amounts to the same thing as committing an act of unethical behavior. How can we believe a President and Justices who do this? Especially when the Justices are denying without comment every case which I consider based on a legitimate question (Is Mr. Obama eligible to run for the POTUS).
It reeks.
Yep. Sounds like his trip to Hawaii to ‘visit his sick grandmother,’ whom he blew off after she died.
The man is a fool and it will eventually backfire on him. I just hope we are given time to get the you know what out of the way.
I thought it was from “The Onion”!
\ Welcome to New Kenya (Africa U.S.A.)
"Where the law of the jungle has replaced the Law of the Land"
Can the SCOTUS not see the Results of this?
If the Constitution is dead, so is our nation!
It’s a great article, although Lynn Stuter might want to be sure that her affairs are in order, as she’ll be one of the first to be rounded up and shipped off to whatever gulag opens up in her region of the USSPR (United States Socialist Peoples Republic).
[snip]
At this point, it should be very obvious to the American people, no matter their party affiliation, that the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the United States government no longer consider themselves the servant of the people, but their master.
Thank you, 'null and void' and 'autumnraine'.
Ping.
Excerpt, Related:
Orly had to explain to Mr. Bickell when he called her how we citizens got concerned when we saw the information about the cases we have all supported, worked on, and followed disappear from the docket.
Orly also had to explain to Mr. Bickell that many of us citizens are also concerned about the 8 out of 9 justices meeting privately with Mr. Obama. No reporters were allowed. No attorneys were invited on behalf of the Plaintiffs. This causes many of us citizens to question the rules of judicial ethics and causes us to question the impartiality on behalf of the justices.
Quite a number of people have contacted their senators and congressmen because of this meeting and want the justices impeached because the plaintiffs and attorneys weren’t present.
It is a good article.
This inappropriate behavior by the SCOTUS was and is wrong. No amount of excuses and explanations given by some FReepers are acceptable.
Right is right, and this wasn't.
And thanks for the Ping LucyT!
You are correct .. IT WAS 7 TO 2
The 2nd part was 5 to 4 against the FL State court.
He is a liar.
I was looking all over for that too. Than I remember Obambi actually went to the SCOTUS.
It is beginning to look like it. I am disappointed in the Justices right now.
Well .. what if the Chief Justice realized that taking the case before a court where the media would be listening might prove uncomfortable for the country and cause a Constitutional crisis.
What if the Chief Justice told the new President - either produce a birth certificate or you’re out of office.
Wouldn’t anybody want to avoid a Constitutional crisis - especially since 95% of all the blacks in this country would tear it apart if they thought for one moment - the white man - took away their black president.
I just wish a little more common sense would prevail in the world .. it would save a lot of hyperventilating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.