SCOTUS message to the American people

Learn USA ^ | 01/20/2009 | Lynn M Stuter

[FreeAtlanta]

SCOTUS message to the American people

January 20, 2009

On Wednesday, January 14, 2009, at the invitation of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, Also Known As Obama (hereafter known as AKA) and his sidekick, Joseph Biden, paid a visit to the United States Supreme Court, spending the better part of an hour sequestered in secrecy with eight of the nine United States Supreme Court Justices. Justice Alito was not in attendance.

According to an Associated Press release, written by Mark Sherman,

"When employees glimpsed Obama on his way out, a loud cheer went up in a building that exudes decorum."

Can one surmise the Supreme Court ecstatic over the illegitimate ...

The invitation of Chief Justice Roberts, the behind closed door meeting with a man who is the subject of lawsuits coming before the Supreme Court concerning his eligibility to the office of president, was not only inappropriate but leaves questionable the judicial conduct of the justices with whom AKA and Biden met.

Judges are to refrain from appearances of impropriety and partiality; from engaging in activities that compromise the mandate of an independent judiciary. According to the AP piece,

"Eight years ago, President George W. Bush did not visit the court before he took office, but the circumstances were — to put it mildly — unusual.

In December 2000, the court decided the case of Bush v. Gore by a 5-4 vote, ending the legal battle over the contested Florida election and effectively sealing the presidency for Bush."

The circumstances surrounding AKA are just as "unusual", considering the question of eligibility because of his refusal to produce the one document that would prove (or disprove) his eligibility to the office of president — his long form vault copy Hawaii birth certificate — a document that ....

[Polarik]

It is worth mentioning that, in the two months it has been posted to FR, my Final Report on Obama's COLB analysis has garnered over 61,841 views! That might be a record for FR.

Folks ought to know on which side of the bread it's buttered.

[MHGinTN]

I think I've had/Calpernia's web storage has had nearly that many downloads of the book I posted online on stem cells and cloning [America, We Need To Talk]. Calpernia, do you have stats as of Dec '08?

[MHGinTN]

We need a few million clicks on that report, Polarik.

[Polarik]

In 1961, father's race would have been Negroid not african.

This is a dan Rather fake but accurate

I setlled this issue before and elsewhere, but old news keeps coming back like a bad penny. All of what I am about to tell you comes straight out of the rules for the 1960 Census.

IF, and ONLY IF, Obama Sr. was an American citizen would his classification be either NEGRO or BLACK. Since Obama Sr. was a British citizen, and a nonimmigrant from Kenya, the census taker would have checked, "Other," and filled in the blank whatever the person told them. They used the names of continents for other non-citizens, such as "South America," and "Central America." These are, in fact, examples cited in the 1960 Census instructions. so, it would not be a stretch for a non-citizen from one of the countries in Africa to say, "African."

HOWEVER, here's a possible reason why Obama Sr. would have said "African" instead of Kenyan. The Mau Mau uprising against the British, that lasted from 1952 to 1960. Kenya did not become an independent state until 1963.

Barack's grandfather supposedly was imprisioned and tortured for his suspected role in the uprising. This might have been a good time for Obama Sr. to "get out of Dodge," and go to the US.

[Calpernia]

For: America, We Need To Talk

Start Date: 20081201
End Date: 20081231

Traffic (total)
22080 hits

[MHGinTN]

Thanks Cal. Shows how important Polarik’s report is. He has had that many hits in weeks, the stem cell book has been up for years!

[mlo]

"Hawaiian law, at the time of Obama’s birth, allowed for FOREIGN born baby’s to be registered in Hawaii via a ‘Certificate of Live Birth’: “[§338-17.8]"

As I explained in a previous post, that law was passed in 1982.

[Uri’el-2012]

XS>In 1961, father's race would have been Negroid not african.

This is a dan Rather fake but accurate

I setlled this issue before and elsewhere,

yada yada; non sequitur; yada yada; non sequitur

What was on the Birth Certificate in Hawaii
and what the guidelines were used to fill in the entry for RACE.

Discussions about the Census are non sequiturs.

OBTW welcome to FR

[Polarik]

What was on the Birth Certificate in Hawaii and what the guidelines were used to fill in the entry for RACE.

Yada-yada yourself. Unless you've been off FR for the past seven months, I, more than anyone else on the planet, want to know what's on the original BC. I proved that Obama's COLB does not exist, so NOTHING on it is legit.

But, I can tell you, for damn sure, that it's NOT bogus because it says, "AFRICAN," on it, and THAT's the point I was making here.

I spoke with the State Registrar, Alvin Onaka, back in July, and one of the things I asked him was if Hawaii followed the Census guidelines for race classifications.

Call him yourself if you want to know what he told me.

Oh, and look up the meaning of non sequitur while you're at it.

[Polarik]

We need a few million clicks on that report, Polarik.

Well, can I add to it the views on Obamacrimes, WND, Langbert, Lamphere, Faith2Action, Anti-Mullah, Andy Martin, Townhall, and the 300,000 other sites? Or do I have to stick to clicks on FR only?

[Canedawg]

Wrong!

you do not understand how legislative history works.

Go do your own homework, I gave you a head start.

And sto pmaking uninformed posts.

[mlo]

Just saying I’m wrong doesn’t prove anything. If you have some basis for it, post it. I already explained how we know that law was passed in 1982.

[Canedawg]

Dont waste our time with your BS.

You have no comprehension of the legislative history of that law that is in the books in the law library.

get off the net with your obamabot crap and go learn something from a REAL book. The answer is in there.

[mlo]

Like I said, just saying it's wrong doesn't prove anything.

You can't just claim authority and declare yourself right. The legislative history is footnoted on the statute. I pointed it out. Empty declarations of superior knowledge aren't worth anything.