Posted on 01/22/2009 7:56:16 PM PST by FreeAtlanta
SCOTUS message to the American people
January 20, 2009
On Wednesday, January 14, 2009, at the invitation of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, Also Known As Obama (hereafter known as AKA) and his sidekick, Joseph Biden, paid a visit to the United States Supreme Court, spending the better part of an hour sequestered in secrecy with eight of the nine United States Supreme Court Justices. Justice Alito was not in attendance.
According to an Associated Press release, written by Mark Sherman,
"When employees glimpsed Obama on his way out, a loud cheer went up in a building that exudes decorum."
Can one surmise the Supreme Court ecstatic over the illegitimate ...
The invitation of Chief Justice Roberts, the behind closed door meeting with a man who is the subject of lawsuits coming before the Supreme Court concerning his eligibility to the office of president, was not only inappropriate but leaves questionable the judicial conduct of the justices with whom AKA and Biden met.
Judges are to refrain from appearances of impropriety and partiality; from engaging in activities that compromise the mandate of an independent judiciary. According to the AP piece,
"Eight years ago, President George W. Bush did not visit the court before he took office, but the circumstances were — to put it mildly — unusual.
In December 2000, the court decided the case of Bush v. Gore by a 5-4 vote, ending the legal battle over the contested Florida election and effectively sealing the presidency for Bush."
The circumstances surrounding AKA are just as "unusual", considering the question of eligibility because of his refusal to produce the one document that would prove (or disprove) his eligibility to the office of president — his long form vault copy Hawaii birth certificate — a document that ....
(Excerpt) Read more at learn-usa.com ...
People keep repeating that the law dates from 1982... I really have decided to stop even replying to people who ignore stuff and keep repeating the same things but I lost control for a minute.
Revised statute. I wonder in what way it was revised. Anyway, I can live with that, thanks!
The Hawaiian birth certificate rules were extremely relaxed in the past and were not revised until late 1972. When Hawaii originally joined the union they were intent on boosting their births with an eye on federal funding, the more births registered the more federal dollars they would collect. They did the same with regard to the pilot project for food stamps. Hawaii joined the U.S. as a full fledged state in 1959 and began the pilot program for food stamps at the same time.
By 1972 they tightened the rules for issuing Hawaiian birth certificates and by 1982 they tightened them further.
Yeah, I noticed the parroting going on. It was about a certainty that the law was a lot older than 1982.
I see the Chief Engineer helped clarify the matter....
Thanks, Chief - I knew you’d know.
mlo - if you want to take it up, take it up with Chief Engineer, who knows more about 0bama’s actual life than probably anyone else on FR and maybe on the planet.
We need to do some more searching.
Ask Chief Engineer where the source for info above is found.
I would say that we all have a direct and tangible interest in getting a letter of verification from Hawaii. And if Hawaii refuses, then we take our request directly to Governor Lingle who has direct authority over every governmental department, including DOH. Lingle is not a fan of 0, so it would be interesting to see how it would play out.
If she balks, then it's on to the court.
Yes sorry, but we do know at least 338-17.8 “Certificates for children born out of State” is listed as a revised statute (HRS).
It’s listed 1st and 2nd from the top. The Google link:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=338-17.8++hawaii&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
Oh, I see you have been reviewing the thread.
:-)
Just read your suggestion about writing to Hawaii. I just got back from trying to do some more research on Dr. Rodney T. West and I ended up at obamacrimesblog. One of the people there had already written to Hawaii asking for verification that Jr was in fact born there. Instead the person received the standard “privacy concerns” letter from them. I do wonder if anyone has written and asked and included the question as to whether the state of Hawaii will cite privacy concerns when asked for the long form vault copy birth cerificate to display in a Presidential library for Jr?
While I was there I also read a letter which someone had received from Rep. Neil Abercrombie regarding the natural born citizen problem. In the letter which I will paraphrase here he said : “I was a young graduate student in Hawaii in 1960 and 1961 when a young African student named Barack Hussein Obama arrived to study. I was a good friend of Barack Obama Sr. I knew Barack Hussein Obama and Stanley Ann Dunham. They were married and bore a child they named Barack Hussein Obama II. Barack Hussein Obama II is a natural born citizen.”
Do you notice the discrepancies in Abercrombie’s statements? I believe Rep Abercrombie has fried too many brain cells smoking pot!
Okubo is probably an Obot or just wacky.
Both! The majority of Hawaii is Democratic, and Bonkers-for-Obama. That's why it's been so hard to get any cooperation from them.
Senator, I served with Jack Kennedy: I knew Jack Kennedy; Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy.
The question that MUST be posed and MUST be answered by Gov. Linda Lingle and Attorney General, Mark Bennett, is this:
"Was Hawaii's Department of Health complicit in this forgery?"
What would they do if we were to accuse the DOH of direct complicity in committing felony document fraud?
We give them copies of the Factcheck photos that clearly show the 2006/2008 Seal on the 2007 Obama COLB, date-stamped June 6, 2007. The 2007 COLB has the 2007 borders and the 2007 date stamp, but not the 2007 embossed Seal. It cannot be a "mistake" because the 2006 Seal stamp was not used in 2007 (as evidenced by my March 22, 2007 COLB image).
"THIS WILL WORK," to quote Gene Wilder in "Young Frankenstein."
What possible reason(s) could they give for not investigating this? They cannot claim "Privacy issues" because no private information would ever be released outside of the Govenor's office and/or the AG's office. All personally identifiable information would be kept confidential. All that needs to be done is for Hawaii's Governor and/or the AG to check the logs at Vital Records and verify if a COLB for cert. no. #010640 was printed and date-stamped on June 6, 2007. Either there is a record of it, or there isn't. If somehow the log for that cert. no. is "missing," they can still verify the information shown on Factcheck's photo against the birth record. They can do that, too, even if they found no log of the COLB being produced on 06/06/07.
They cannot call the request frivolous -- not after seeing Factcheck's photos of a 2007 COLB w/o the 2007 embossed Seal. If they choose to COA and not do the investigation, or do it, but basically rubber-stamp the bogus results, then they open themselves up for being charged as accessories to felony fraud after the fact.
The media would be made aware of it, that's for sure. I'm not just talking aboutthe MSM: I'm talking about local news sources, beginning with Hawaii's own. If not there, then onto the local news affiliates in major cities.
Someone suggested to form a large crowd and assemble outside of government buildings and local media outlets. Then, this "protest" would be then be shown on the local news, and on the internet. Following that, the hope is for the major news networks to carry it.
Even if they didn't, we should distribute a press release along with the tape to as many news outlets as possible, local, regional, national, and international.
The crowd would all be holding signs showing a copy of the real 2007 COLB Seal vs. Obama's 2007 COLB Seal (like PhilDragoo's example), with the title, "This birth certificate is a fake."
Just some random thoughts.
To get the ball rolling, how would one go about getting this done?
By filing a criminal compliant with a law enforcement agency or District Attorney? File it directly with Attorney General, Mark Bennett? What federal or state law(s) could be cited that were violated? “FactCheck’s” defense would be we thought it was genuine. Would Polarik’s analysis of Obama’s COLB be enough for an investigation authority to open a case? They would use their own examiners to confirm Polarik’s analysis work.
I agree that it’s an avenue that should be looked at.
Hawaiian law, at the time of Obama’s birth, allowed for FOREIGN born baby’s to be registered in Hawaii via a ‘Certificate of Live Birth’: “[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State…” http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.htm
Unbelievable....just unbelieveable....
Maybe if we're faced with some awful crisis, well above and beyond any civil unrest, it will finally surface?
Its my guess that the information is being used to deliberately manipulate Obama. He is so compromised its ridiculous. Just ask anyone in Law Enforcement what the Chicago “Down Low” is. Obama was not just part of it, he was a full on participant alone with Michelle for years. Blago as well, Rev. Wright, yea, you name any corrupt activity a person can engage in at a party and you have the Chicago “Down Low”, and you can include anyone who “IS anyone” in Politics there in it, its something of a job requirement. They all laugh it off as “oh you all know how dirty politics is in Chicago... hahaha” Its a lot dirtier than most Americans can imagine.
I’d file it directly to Gov. Linda Lingle and AG Mark Bennett. Showing them the analysis of the Seals and borders would be enough to get it going.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.