Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Solar Power Is Hoax
The Albuquerque Journal ^ | January 15, 2009 | James P. O'Loughlin, Placitas Engineer

Posted on 01/17/2009 5:05:53 PM PST by CedarDave

The article “N.M. Solar Energy Plan Expanded,” about the state Public Regulation Commission's promotion of grid-tied photovoltaic (PV) power generation states that ... invest[ment] in PV installations will have “free” electricity.

I evaluated such an installation for our house using Public Service Company of New Mexico PV information on its Web site. I checked the results against more sophisticated resources and found the PNM results to be in good agreement.

For my house, a PV system's cost is about $10,000 per kw, or for our case about $40,000.

... Based on a 20-year life and 6 percent cost of money, this comes to a monthly cost of $286.57. The monthly cost for the same amount of energy from PNM service is $42.75 — where is the “free” electricity?

There is an insurmountable fact of nature that forces photovoltaic to be several times more expensive than conventional power generation: The sun doesn't shine for 24 hours a day. This requires that a PV generation installation must have a power rating that is about six times higher than a continuously running conventional installation for the same energy output.

~~snip~~

The cliché about investing in research and development to decrease the cost of panels and make PV power generation competitive is an unachievable myth that is fanatically pursued by the government and other groups having various and peculiar reasons.

When reality is not acceptable, the government can fix it with political alchemy. Through the influence of pressure groups and lobbyists, state and federal governments decree that photovoltaic power generation must be implemented. To fix the inherently expensive PV power generation problem, governments provide tax credits, incentives and other forms of subsidy to cover up the excessive cost.

This does not reduce the actual cost; it just transfers it to the general taxpayer or ratepayer.

(Excerpt) Read more at abqjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: energy; greenenergy; renewableenergy; solar; solarenergy; solarpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: CedarDave

The solar powered toilets in Oregon are ruined because the heavy snowfall covered the solar cells so long the batteries discharges and were destroyed.


41 posted on 01/17/2009 10:31:03 PM PST by Mike Darancette (0 parties while the economy burns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NVDave; Sursum Corda

Good points, both of you.

NVDave, like you said, it’s a problem with “true believers.” I have a liberal relative that is really into alternative energy, and when I started sharing my experiments/research with her she was excited and asked if she could designate me as her researcher for solar projects. And I’m not even an engineer! LOL. Nothing against her—not everyone can be a science/engineering nerd but it points up the essential problem: too many people seeing it as a political issue and not an engineering/technology issue.

Photovoltaics are a neat and useful technology, but there are definite problems with them, and I would have to disagree with anyone who thinks they are “clean and green”, between the manufacturing of the things and the chemical soup of batteries. When someone figures out how to grow them from a plant and store the energy in a lemon then maybe. :)


42 posted on 01/18/2009 4:59:04 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: kickonly88

I don’t doubt it’s coming. But, I have all sorts of plans in place to thwart whatever they can come up with. They’re really not all that smart, LOL! :)


43 posted on 01/18/2009 6:18:58 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
LOL, trying buying enough property to put in a hydro electric. Government power subsidies worked for a long time. Just like building the interstate highway system. But then came lobbyists and rigged contracts and just general mismanagement of the utilities. TVA is a good example, the people running it thought it was their private cash cow and now they are in billions of dollars of debt.
44 posted on 01/18/2009 6:38:32 AM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
The Price-Anderson Act set up a pooling of liability across all operating reactors in the US. Right now, their pooled liability account is worth over $10 billion. Since the insurance requirements are based on a per-facility basis, and not on a size of the facility, the costs of the insurance are easily reduced by increasing the size of the reactor’s generation capacity.

You could buy it cheaper from AIG, but then they would never intend to pay off. So you are back to the funny money insurance and your tax dollars.

45 posted on 01/18/2009 6:42:43 AM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

There’s a designated insurer just for nuke operators, and here’s their website:

http://www.nuclearinsurance.com/

I read somewhere else that a typical annual premium for coverage is $400K/site. That’s just the primary insurance, then they’d need a secondary policy. Dunno how much that would be.


46 posted on 01/18/2009 7:34:27 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
We are entering our 4th year here since building the place. The results have been very gratifying. Heating, A/C and hot water costs under $700.00/yr. A blizzard can be blowing outside and if you weren't looking out the windows you wouldn't sense it.

Feb 2008

47 posted on 01/18/2009 7:35:59 AM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

I almost dare not ask, what with Oregon’s reputation for environmental silliness... but I’m preternaturally curious:

Just why does a toilet need solar power? Or should I say, why did these toilets need solar power? To power a stereo that would play wind chime and pan flute music while a person used them? Or to power the lava lamp for ambiance?


48 posted on 01/18/2009 7:39:21 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: gorush

For where you are, that $700 is chump change. Well done!

From the pic, it looks as tho you use propane for heating fuel?


49 posted on 01/18/2009 7:42:10 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

The propane is for the clothes dryer and stove/oven only.


50 posted on 01/18/2009 7:43:02 AM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

The 100 gal tank lasts a year.


51 posted on 01/18/2009 7:43:57 AM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Compare Edison and Tesla; both recognized inventors of power transmission with the one relying on financing to build and install localized power plants and selling them to those who could afford to buy them while the other pursued a Quixotic dream of supplying even greater, nay virtually free power if only he could gain the funds through a sponsoring supporter.

Edison, ever the practical plugger made money from his inventions, his deft, if at times clumsy artisanship serving himself and his successors while Tesla, far more brilliant and driven by a tireless mind made invention his art and died alone with only the company of a white dove who flew in and out his window to feed on the crumbs of the meager crackers that sustained him in his final days; the dove, the ultimate symbol of peace and sacrifice was likely the final witness to the end of a great man’s life in a pensioned apartment in a fine hotel.

When science becomes more art than quest for elegant solution, the goal becomes more mission than destination.


52 posted on 01/18/2009 8:03:39 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
Yes, but Tesla was the true genus!!
53 posted on 01/18/2009 8:12:44 AM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Yes, but Tesla was the true genus!!

That's a species statement...(rimshot).

54 posted on 01/18/2009 8:13:46 AM PST by Starfleet Command
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
Should add, it is a shame so many have no ideal who Tesla was???
55 posted on 01/18/2009 8:17:22 AM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

I ran a maintenance shop where we had to keep batteries on hand for starting gensets, running golf carts and traction trucks, forklifts, mowing equipment, ag tractors, utility trucks (Cushman), and a few for automotive use.

The only way to guarantee reliability was by using an annual changeout schedule.

We threw away a lot of good batteries but could not afford a failure - large hospital campus operation.

The forklift batteries were an exception since they could be rebuilt.

Reality sets in only after the sale of grand ideas.


56 posted on 01/18/2009 8:17:49 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Starfleet Command

lol


57 posted on 01/18/2009 8:18:02 AM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Lead/acid batteries are almost freeze-proof as long as they remain in a charged state as long as the 25% sulfur solution lasts.

As they go dead the sulfur retreats to the plates and only water is left; the water freezes, the plates buckle, make contact and short out.


58 posted on 01/18/2009 8:22:04 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

The article didn’t say what the electricity was used for but each one cost $140,000. What a joke.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-mainmenu-30/environment/634


59 posted on 01/18/2009 8:23:32 AM PST by Mike Darancette (0 parties while the economy burns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

True but he had the business sense of a poet, the patience of a hummingbird and the determination of a mule without his homing instinct.

Not knowing when to quit, he strove fearlessly ahead from task to task with no care for personal reward save comfort which was denied him in the end but for a mere subsistance allowance from his native land.


60 posted on 01/18/2009 8:39:29 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson