Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Fades to Black after Eight-Year Mitigated Disaster
National Review Online ^ | January 16, 2009 | Deroy Murdock

Posted on 01/16/2009 6:31:14 PM PST by Delacon

As Bush fades to black, his presidency can be summarized with six Cs.

Credit: Several key triumphs make Bush’s tenure merely a mitigated disaster. He first deserves praise for preventing another Islamofascist massacre on American soil. History will applaud the liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq, and Libya’s consequent de-nuclearization. Bush’s tax cuts buoyed the economy before it sailed into the twin icebergs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Justices John Roberts and Sam Alito will keep the Supreme Court constitutional. The D.C. voucher bill remains a school-choice milestone.

Carter: Otherwise, Bush is the Republican Jimmy Carter. This weak, ill-prepared bumbler let Washington eat him alive. Far worse, his apostasies bankrupted America and bombed the GOP into Dresden (often while an equally unprincipled, profligate Republican Congress navigated). The principled, fiscally responsible free-market/conservative movement is hobbled for its association with Bush, despite his serial violations of its tenets. The Right now must spend years scrubbing away Bush’s stain with brushes and Ajax.

Core: Alas, Bush has no philosophical core. He has a few sensible instincts: Tax cuts good. Terrorists bad. Abortion ugly. Most else is up for grabs.

In 2001, Bush initiated federal stem-cell research. By 2008, Bush nationalized private companies and steered the republic into $13.35 trillion in bailout commitments.

Bush’s instant socialism is the legacy of his Saran Wrap-deep faith in free markets. Under Bush, federal spending grew 32 percent (or 4.1 percent annually) — more quickly than inflation, Heritage Foundation analyst Brian Riedl calculates. Absent the Iraq and Afghan wars, Homeland Security, and Katrina relief, spending swelled 26 percent, or 3.3 percent annually, after inflation.

Since 1932, only FDR expanded Washington’s share of the economy more rapidly than Bush did. The Medicare drug entitlement, No Child Left Behind, two massive farm-welfare bills, and 69,341 un-vetoed earmarks are among the ghastly monuments of “compassionate conservatism.

Bush kicked fresh gravel into his supporters’ eyes when he kept the Education Department open, increased its budget 58 percent ahead of inflation, and then, for no apparent purpose, christened its headquarters the Lyndon Baines Johnson Department of Education Building.

More than 60 education laws were part of the vast number of legislative measures that made up the Great Society,” crowed Lynda Johnson Robb when the structure was renamed in September 2007. “But Daddy wasn’t as interested in the number of laws he helped enact as he was in the number of lives those laws help enrich.”

By signing the 822-page Energy Independence Act on Dec. 19, 2007, Bush extinguished the incandescent light bulb. This keystone of Yankee ingenuity failed in some 10,000 experiments until a perseverant Thomas Edison perfected it in 1880. Now it will become illegal in 2014. If compact-fluorescent and halogen bulbs outsell Edison’s invention, so be it. But for this quintessentially American creation to be prohibited by federal law is precisely the sort of abomination the Republican party was invented to prevent.

Communications: Bush raised the failure to communicate to a governing principle. This goes far beyond his linguistic pratfalls—such as Tuesday’s reference to helicopter pilots as “chopper drivers.” Besides not explaining its policies, the administration handed its opponents fresh truncheons with which to pound it silly.

Bush and his minions refused to detail the multifarious ties between Saddam Hussein and Islamofascist terrorists. They even stayed quiet about Manhattan-based, Clinton-appointed U.S. District judge Harold Baer’s May 7, 2003 decision that Hussein provided “material support” to the 9/11 conspirators. In Smith v. Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Judge Baer ruled that Hussein's Baathist government and the Taliban assisted Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda. Judge Baer — who President Clinton nominated in April 1994 — ordered Hussein, Iraq’s former government, and this case’s other losing parties to pay $104 million in civil damages to the families of George Eric Smith and Timothy Soulas, both murdered on September 11, 2001, at the World Trade Center. Judge Baer added: “Again, since the al-Qaeda defendants and Iraq are jointly and severally liable, they are all responsible for the payment of any judgment that may be entered.”

Rather than publicize this federal court decision, Bush & Co. instead echoed the Left’s claims that Saddam Hussein had no connection to al-Qaeda, much less September 11.

Bush covered this topic most thoroughly at Kansas State University on Jan. 23, 2006. Bush said:

[Hussein] was a state sponsor of terror. In other words, the government had declared, you are a state sponsor of terror. . . . There’s a reason why he was declared a state sponsor of terror — because he was sponsoring terror.

When the administration found 3,894 pounds of low-enriched uranium in Iraq, Bush did not call a news conference. Instead, the Energy Department issued an almost totally ignored press release on July 6, 2004. Ditto the 606.3 tons of yellowcake uranium that the administration moved from Iraq to Canada last July. Despite the Left’s relentless charges that Bush lied about Saddam Hussein’s fondness for yellowcake, this development passed in near silence.

Bush’s Nov. 5, 2003 signing of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban (a good thing) featured Bush onstage at Washington’s Constitution Hall. Behind him stood GOP lawmakers Tom DeLay, Bill Frist, Dennis Hastert, Orrin Hatch, Rick Santorum, James Sensenbrenner, and others — all male. The White House press and advance teams arranged this much-needed curtailment of abortion rights and yet could not place even one woman beside the president. Why were no female senators nor congresswomen near Bush? Better yet, why not surround him with pro-life moms and their infants, perhaps some who were saved through crisis-pregnancy counseling? This public-relations malpractice let the National Organization for Women use a photo of Bush and the boys as an Internet recruitment and fundraising tool.

Cheek: Bush turned the other cheek until both were bloodied beyond recognition. Too nice by half, his “new tone in Washington” unilaterally disarmed Team Bush against critics who devoured them like piranhas.

This problem began with reports that outgoing Clinton staffers had trashed the White House. Had Bush brought in news cameras to document the destruction then only verbally described in the media, Bill and Hillary would have been terminally discredited. But Bush & Co. covered up for the Clintons, perhaps thinking this would buy peace with the Left. Yeah, right.

When then-senator James Jeffords (R., Vt.) became an independent in June 2001, the Senate switched from Republican to Democratic control. The day before the hand-off, Bush included Jeffords in a Cabinet Room photo opportunity. Message: “Go ahead. Ruin Bush’s day; get a bear hug.”

Bush took heat for skipping the NAACP’s 2004 convention. He and his publicists could have detailed the repugnant “old tone” comments by NAACP leaders, such as its then-executive director Kweisi Mfume. He said Bush is “prepared to take us back to the days of Jim Crow segregation and dominance.” Instead, these noxious words went unrepeated, and the notion that Bush is anti-black went unrefuted.

Bush’s lackadaisical response to Hurricane Katrina generated outrageous genocide accusations.

George Bush is our Bull Connor,” Rep. Charles Rangel (D., N.Y.) said on Sept. 22, 2005. “If you’re black in this country, and you’re poor in this country, it’s not an inconvenience. It’s a death sentence.”

Rather than loudly rebuff such sludge with facts (e.g., the Coast Guard rescued 33,544 Katrina survivors as soon as wind speeds allowed; between 2000 and 2003, federal anti-poverty spending grew in Orleans Parish, La., by 73.3 percent per recipient under Bush), the White House rolled over and played dead, silently confirming for many the despicable lie that Bush let blacks drown in New Orleans attics just for kicks.

Crawford: His ranch in Crawford, Texas, is the perfect place for G. W. Bush to disappear and never be heard from again. 


Deroy Murdock is a columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. 



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: bush; bushlegacy; deroymurdock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last
To: Moonman62

“But anyway, W is a terrible communicator.”

I think he second-guesses himself now.


41 posted on 01/16/2009 7:05:12 PM PST by combat_boots ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."Aldous Huxley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Not that Bush was ever “a conservative”. But this is choice coming from these wanna be elitist Neo-con clowns at NRO since they played a big hand in the idiocy of damning conservative values...What did thet expect?


42 posted on 01/16/2009 7:06:06 PM PST by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Who would be your 2nd best President, after Reagan, from 1964 forward?

A better question would be who ties for last? What I can't stand about the Bushes is that Reagan saved the party, and was a great president, yet, not only did they not follow his example, they pushed Reaganism out of the party.

I don't know if you noticed, but the Bush-bots have been attempting to trash Reagan for years in order to make their guy look good. In return, I'll be exposing W and the rest of his illegal alien loving family for the rest of my life.

43 posted on 01/16/2009 7:06:13 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
FDR was right on the most important issue of the day which was fascism. Doesn't mean I regard him highly as a president.

Was fascism really the most important issue of FDR's day? Or was it the Great Depression?

Last I heard he gets more credit for pulling the country out of the Depression -- which is dead wrong -- than he does for winning WW II -- which is right.

FDR's legacy is a mixed bag -- like most Presidents.

In your estimation, after Reagan, who was the 2nd best President from 1964 forward?

44 posted on 01/16/2009 7:06:40 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Time will show he did a great job. I am not worried.

I am worried after monday

Exactly my point. George Bush has the luxury of sitting around in comfort waiting for "Time to show" whatever it will show. You and the rest of us don't have that luxury, we have to live with the results now. He doesn't have a worry in the world after Monday. His worries will be over. But the rest of us are screwed.

45 posted on 01/16/2009 7:06:47 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Barbara was right - Jeb was the one who should’a been President. Good as Governor of Texas, over his head as President. A prime example of the Peter Principle.

"Too bad! Too bad!..OH! TOO BAD!"

46 posted on 01/16/2009 7:06:53 PM PST by muleskinner ("You know the Germans always make good stuff')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

Because of our level of giving in the past, the GOP hounded us to death this election cycle. We refused to give them a dime. They have left candidates out to dry who tried to fight the system. Jeannine Pirro for one. They don’t want the system changed. They have become fat little piggies at the trough.

I don’t know where our votes will go next time but I can’t see voting for either of the two main parties until there is a shakeup somewhere. Some third party will be the beneficiary next time.


47 posted on 01/16/2009 7:07:54 PM PST by TruthSlayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: okie01

1 thing is absolutely certain:

Bush did what he honestly thought was right.

Despite lots of crying from Republicans on illegals, he held to his views on amnesty.

And despite lots of crying from liberals (including the powerful politicos), he stood firm on Gitmo and the war.

You can’t say, unlike certain other “men”, he ruled by polls.


48 posted on 01/16/2009 7:11:23 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“That’s not so bad. I’ve heard pilots refer to themselves as drivers. But anyway, W is a terrible communicator.”

Imagine being a speech writer or a press secretary. How do you get the message out if your president really has no message. Tax cuts got him elected because everyone likes tax cuts. There was no limited gov’t message there. His response to 911 got him re-elected because most Americans wanted to put some harm on those countries that were part of the problem, payback. There wasn’t any organized proactive message there. It wasn’t ever a war on terror, it was a war on islamofascists yet Bush didnt have the guts to call it that. As for social and economic policy over his eight years, it was duck bob and weave. No message and no conservative ideas.


49 posted on 01/16/2009 7:12:25 PM PST by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Where’s the BARF alert??


50 posted on 01/16/2009 7:12:40 PM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
I don't know if you noticed, but the Bush-bots have been attempting to trash Reagan for years in order to make their guy look good.

Frankly, I haven't.

I don't think it's a "Bush-bot" vs Reagan thing at all. I think it is a "leftist troll vs Reagan" thing.

51 posted on 01/16/2009 7:14:36 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Nixon did a lot of good for the nation but had his own faults especially with domestic policy. As we know, he resigned shortly after winning a landslide victory due to Watergate. Watergate was a leftist media created event, much like the Plame affair of more recent times. So I would say Nixon, W (first term only), then Bush Sr. None of the three measured up to Reagan in all aspects.


52 posted on 01/16/2009 7:16:39 PM PST by doosee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Sad to say, I have to agree with most of this article overall. I give President Bush credit for defending America against another attack, for some tax cuts, and for appointing two good SC justices—all important things—but that’s about it. Communication skills—whether on Iraq or on conservative principles—abysmal. Cutting spending and downsizing government—abysmal. Effect on the Republican Party—abysmal.


53 posted on 01/16/2009 7:19:11 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (Philosophical conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

>> Where would Bush rank in that group of eight Presidents? Realistically, a solid #2. Think about it...

I see your point.

I was originally a very strong W supporter, especially his handling of 9/11 and the WOT.

On the other hand, I am extremely disapointed with much he has done on the domestic front, and I agree in large part with Deroy Murdock.

On the third hand... I haven’t *voted* since 1964 (only since 74), but I can’t argue with you on your one-two pick. Reagan and W are clearly the top two during that period. (Nixon could fight W for the #2 spot if he hadn’t had that nasty dark side to him...)

But if you wait til ‘12 or ‘16 to evaluate, I really think that Obama will push W out of the #2 spot.
...
...
...
...
...
HA! MADE YOU LOOK! Just kidding about Hussein.


54 posted on 01/16/2009 7:22:00 PM PST by Nervous Tick (I've left Cynical City... bound for Jaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bboop

I actually have a Republican luncheon..this should be fun.


55 posted on 01/16/2009 7:22:33 PM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: doosee
So I would say Nixon, W (first term only), then Bush Sr. None of the three measured up to Reagan in all aspects.

A not unreasonable ranking. What if you included both Nixon terms and both Bush terms?

56 posted on 01/16/2009 7:23:01 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Delacon; GunsareOK
Eight Wasted Years
...Margaret Thatcher used to talk about the “ratchet effect.” When the Left gets power, she said, they drive everything Left; when the Right gets power, they slow the Leftward drive, perhaps even halt it for a spell; but nothing ever gets moved to the Right. U.S. politics in the 21st century so far bears out this dismal analysis. What does the Right have to show for eight years of a Republican presidency? I supported George W. Bush in 2000 because I thought he had a conservative bone in his body somewhere. I supported him in 2004 because I thought him the lesser of two evils. At this point, I wouldn’t let the fool park his car in my driveway. Bruce Bartlett was right, every damn word...
Bill Gertz interview on Hannity and Colmes
Gertz: Well he casts himself as a compassionate conservative and I argue that he's neither. That his administration is neither. He's done tremendous damage to the conservative movement...

57 posted on 01/16/2009 7:24:52 PM PST by BufordP ("I've abandoned free market principles to save the free market system."--George "the Abandoner" Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
HA! MADE YOU LOOK! Just kidding about Hussein.

That deserves a "Yes, you did."

58 posted on 01/16/2009 7:25:36 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Based on inclusion of both terms then I place: W first, Nixon, then Bush Sr. All in all, sort of a sad tale for the three that didnt have to be sad with just a handful of different decisions and events.


59 posted on 01/16/2009 7:27:04 PM PST by doosee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Don't forget "Islam means peace"
60 posted on 01/16/2009 7:29:16 PM PST by ConservativeCompendium.net (We need to amend the US Constitution. We the People --> We the Politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson